On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 07:05:49PM +, Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Great experience! But I have no possibility to recompile each sound producer
> software to have sndio support.
>
> So my way is to use additional layer of well implemented sound architecture
> and it add additional layer to
After upgrading to OpenBSD 6.9 'ValueError: ZIP does not support timestamps
before 1980' exceptions started occuring when installing python packages by:
'python3.8 setup.py install --user' where the package was built by:
'python3.8 setup.py sdist --formats gztar' and extracted from the archive
Hi Kenneth,
It was staring me in the face and I did not see it. I shot myself in the foot
and didn’t realize it.
Thanks heaps for your support.
From: Kenneth Gober
Sent: Monday, 10 May 2021 11:49 PM
To: Dirk Coetzee
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: NAT on same interface as vlan on OpenBSD
Hi,
Great experience! But I have no possibility to recompile each sound producer
software to have sndio support.
So my way is to use additional layer of well implemented sound architecture and
it add additional layer to sound system for sure.
I've tried to use alsa-sndio module from
Dear David,
How do you start homeassistant after a reboot? Manually?
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: David Gwynne
Aan: pas...@pascallen.nl
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: Home Assistant
Datum: Mon, 10 May 2021 19:31:50 +1000
E-mailprogramma: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
ive been running
> > On Apr 29, 2021, at 9:13 AM, Steven Surdock
> > wrote:
> >
> > I switched from trunk to aggr on a "OpenBSD 6.8 GENERIC.MP#5 amd64" and it
> > isn't load balancing across the two configured links. The remote side is a
> > Cisco ASR9k with the same configuration. Is that expected?
> >
>
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:26 AM Dirk Coetzee wrote:
> I am hoping to create a pf.conf configuration that has VLAN’s and NAT via
> the same (physical) interface. The hardware is only capable of having a
> single Ethernet interface.
>
> vlan100 is an isolated network to setup servers and is
Thank you Denis,Stu,
I added option-138, the syntax is correct now but the AP doesn't connect to the
Controller.
Did I missed any other option(s) in my dhcpd.conf or should I look for the
reason at the Controller side?
subnet 10.109.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option routers
Le lundi 10 mai 2021 à 22:51 +1000, David Gwynne a écrit :
>
>
> > On 10 May 2021, at 8:05 pm, Bastien Durel
> > wrote:
> >
> > Le samedi 08 mai 2021 à 12:07 +0200, Bastien Durel a écrit :
> > > Le 08/05/2021 à 11:56, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > > > > > Does it work if you use the syntax
> On 10 May 2021, at 8:05 pm, Bastien Durel wrote:
>
> Le samedi 08 mai 2021 à 12:07 +0200, Bastien Durel a écrit :
>> Le 08/05/2021 à 11:56, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> Does it work if you use the syntax suggested in the upgrade
> notes
> for the example with "pass in on pppoe1
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 02:07:59PM +0200, Thomas Huber wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> thanks for your input.
>
> And how would you do it?
Just like I described.
> Also putting each vport(4) in its own rdomain(4) and veb(4) takes care of
> Layer2 connectivity without any pf(4) involvment?
Yes.
Two
Hi David,
thanks for your input.
And how would you do it?
Also putting each vport(4) in its own rdomain(4) and veb(4) takes care of
Layer2 connectivity without any pf(4) involvment?
thanks
Thomas
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 08:10, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I'd give this a go with
On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 01:50:24PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021-05-08, Theodore Wynnychenko wrote:
> >
> > Hello again:
> >
> > I am re-posting this message with additional information..
> > While I have no expectation that there will be any reply, I am hopeful there
> > may be.
>
>
Thanks Stuart for the answer
the new flags don't change the log output.
While with tcpdump I can see that the other endpoint is sending correct ipsec
parameters:
12:49:08.025601 *.fastwebnet.it.isakmp > *.it.isakmp: [udp sum ok] isakmp v1.0
exchange ID_PROT
cookie:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 12:05:16PM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> Referencing fe80::520f:80ff:fe65:8800%pppoe0 in pf.conf results in a
> rule referencing fe80::520f:80ff:fe65:8800
I'm not sure where the scope id gets stripped, but the above may simply
be a misleading cosmetic issue.
pfctl -sr
Le samedi 08 mai 2021 à 12:07 +0200, Bastien Durel a écrit :
> Le 08/05/2021 à 11:56, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > > > Does it work if you use the syntax suggested in the upgrade
> > > > notes
> > > > for the example with "pass in on pppoe1 reply-to ..."?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > For incoming
ive been running hass on openbsd for a while now, and just did a new
install on 6.9 for my boss on the weekend.
i set up a _hass user for it to run as, and gave it /opt/hass:
hass$ getent passwd _hass
_hass:*:2000:2000:Home Assistant:/opt/hass:/sbin/nologin
hass$ getent group 2000
_hass:*:2000
Hi All,
I am hoping to create a pf.conf configuration that has VLAN’s and NAT via the
same (physical) interface. The hardware is only capable of having a single
Ethernet interface.
vlan100 is an isolated network to setup servers and is connected to a switch
that is setup for vlan100 and
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 02:02:30AM -0600, Jonathan Drews wrote:
> Hello Folks:
>
> I am using OpenBSD 6.9 GENERIC.MP#473 amd64
Hi Guys:
Disregard the first email. I ran firefox as an ordinary user with the
url http://localhost:631 and I was able to upload the *.ppd from
my ~/Downloads
> I
Jonathan Drews writes:
> Hello Folks:
>
> I am using OpenBSD 6.9 GENERIC.MP#473 amd64
>
> I need to disable unveil so I can load files into Firefox from
> other directories. I also cannot load my *.ppd when using my
> webbrowser in root. In the past, I have configured CUPS with the
> URL
Hello Folks:
I am using OpenBSD 6.9 GENERIC.MP#473 amd64
I need to disable unveil so I can load files into Firefox from
other directories. I also cannot load my *.ppd when using my
webbrowser in root. In the past, I have configured CUPS with the
URL http://localhost:631. I need to be able to
Hi Thomas,
I'd give this a go with vport(4) interfaces instead of vether(4), and join them
all together at layer 2 by adding them to a single veb(4).
Cheers,
dlg
> On 10 May 2021, at 03:04, Thomas Huber wrote:
>
> Hi misc,
>
> I wanted to tinker with the cluster manager sysutils/nomad but
>
22 matches
Mail list logo