On 3/14/10 5:47 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:53:12 -0700 Ted Robyted.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Jason Dixonja...@dixongroup.net
wrote:
https://https.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/order?CD47=1CD47%2b=Add
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
And I thought I was early!
Just a bit under 10 minutes from the cvs email.
Not sure if you are the first one, but I challenge you for the next
release! (;
The looser have to buy two!
Any other up for the challenge?
On 3/14/10 11:23 AM, Ted Roby wrote:
Date Sat Mar 13 16:36:24 MST
On 3/14/10 5:12 PM, Steve Shockley wrote:
On 3/14/2010 2:38 PM, Denny White wrote:
2010/3/14-12:29:45-27293
I can play too!
Order number 2010/3/12-10:57:51-952
Hey,
No cheating. (;
That's before the 4.7 release was even done.
You order 4.6, not 4.7 right?
On 3/23/10 6:28 PM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:45:51 -0500 Ahlsen-Girard, Edward F CTR USAF
AFSOC AFSOC/A6OKedward.ahlsen-girard@hurlburt.af.mil wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 20:50:18, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
If two things happen after another, it does not imply that the
On 3/23/10 5:40 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:36 PM, David Vasekva...@fido.cz wrote:
there are bad news about RB600A. As everybody can read on MicroTik's
website, RB600A has suddenly been discontinued:
http://www.routerboard.com/pricelist.php?showProduct=55
They also
On 3/30/10 6:05 PM, Andreas Gerdd wrote:
I have changed the httpd.conf file as follows:
DirectoryIndex index.html index.php
But httpd still loads the index.php instead index.html after the restart.
Both files are existing in the htdocs.
How can i change the index file priority order?
(I am
Hi,
Purely for fun and interest on low power impressive little box.
Just to follow up on previous emails on misc@ for the super micro
X7SLA-H and good feedback from henning on it. I decided to give a try to
the newer one to see. The X7SPA-HF. Very impressive for a small box and
very low
OpenBSD 5.8 (GENERIC.MP) #356: Mon Aug 9 00:28:02 MDT 2010
^^^
dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
Really?
Unless I am mistaken, that should be in 5 years from now. Can I get a
turn in your time machine and get the next winning loto numbers so
On 8/13/10 7:35 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
You can try smtpd(8) which is in base. Some people reported that they
are using it in production already. At least configuration is much
more easier then in sendmail(8)
I have been for almost 18 months now. I use it as spam filter and front
end for
On 8/13/10 8:27 AM, Fredrik Henbjork wrote:
On 08/13/2010 10:49 AM, Richard Toohey wrote:
But as Christer has said, if it's in the OpenBSD base, that should
mean something.
Just because it's in base doesn't mean that it's the best choice.
After all, it *could* just mean that noone has had
On 8/13/10 9:08 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net [2010-08-13 15:04]:
Hmmm. Sendmail was in base and is still in the system, but was
replace as the default MTA by smtpd a few release ago.
bullshit.
You are right as out of the box MTA in standard operation. I
But I also like my network servers
to have been field proven in the nasty wilderness by others
for some time before starting to use them myself in production,
Men, that's rather very selfish! So, you want everyone one else to do
the work, but not you!? You don't want to participate in testing
i used ftpd (-4Dln) for users to upload their website(with /etc/ftpchroot
configured).
My problem, user can see content of others.
For example, 2ndxx can update his folder but he can see also the content of
firstxx folder.
How can i restrict that ?
Well, you could setup no login in the
In trying the latest snapshots on sparc64 servers, so far 3 of them all
give me the same errors. I can't use the -n flag anymore with rdate as
before.
It worked on 4.7 and before. Not sure of the exact date it stop working.
Any suggestions?
Best,
Daniel
Example:
# rdate -pcv
I just tested the first one first from Matthieu.
That worked.
Also, just fyi. Shouldn't the line have only one ;;
+ u_char *receive = (u_char *)receivebuf;;
Not a big deal for sure. (;
I will test Kenneth one in a few minutes and report back too.
On 8/15/10 7:08 AM, Kenneth R
On 8/15/10 7:08 AM, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:16:32AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net wrote:
In trying the latest snapshots on sparc64 servers, so far 3 of them all give
me the same errors. I can't
Hi,
If this is stupid, just say so and ignore me, but I don't really know
much about how the smart drive suppose to be any good monitoring works
to alerts of up coming hard drive failures. I saw some exchanges on
misc@ from Marco I think, may be when talks about softraid where he give
an
One question here. Shouldn't the spamdb -t -a w.x.y.z when adding a trap
manually in the spamd database also removed any grey listing for the
same IP's?
What happened is of in the same 4 hours window I manually add an IP to
the trap, but I also see source for that IP in the greg listing, they
On 9/3/10 10:56 PM, k z wrote:
Hello,
Could anyone share Sun 1U FireX4100 Opteron256-3.0GHz(2x) dmesg?
X4100 had reported amd64.mp crashes [1] before, are these still present?
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg92883.html
Here you go.
Your success may be different then
Well, thanks for the info but I think I cannot use that kind of
boxes in this specific environment cause I need fanless boxes.
Well, if you are looking for fan less boxes, I use this one:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015A-PHF.cfm
dmesg is in the archive as well if
Hi,
Many things got me to want to write a quick thank you note to the devs
for a long time and as many things goes, times fly and sadly I keep
putting it off.
But, I guess some of the very disgraceful emails one misc@ lately
including some totally off topics f*cked up one about OpenBSD
I've been told I succeed from time to time. :)
Men I fell bad now! Only from time to time!?
Men, you are doing an incredible job and I sure hell do not envy you by
a very long shut!
I am the first buyer of Nick book with plenty of Nick-isims in it! (;
The FAQ is actually what got me going
On 2/17/11 4:33 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
your way to configure aliases is correct, however, the masks are not.
you are screwing up routing. you want an all-ones netmask on each and
every IP address except one per subnet. alas you want 255.255.255.255
on the carp if's IPs.
That explains alot.
Think about it that way may be.
You want an alias IP's, not an alias subnet, so how do you enter a single IP?
With a /32 subnet.
Actually I _do_ want to have alias subnets, as written before:
Why?
Please note that I would like to have 172.12.96.0/22,
but 172.12.101.0/24 and
On 2/18/11 5:42 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net [2011-02-18 11:15]:
Alias are enter with /32.
huh? hell no.
OK, but all examples show it as such in man(5) hostname.if and such.
Your network card is configure with the IP 172.12.96.5 and you want
to have on
On 2/18/11 6:10 AM, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
one IP per subnet with the real mask so there is a route, all others
with all-ones netmask.
Then, It is like this..
# cat
/etc/hostname.em0
inet 192.168.9.62 255.255.255.0
inet alias 192.168.9.63 255.255.255.255
inet alias 192.168.5.62
On 2/18/11 3:23 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net wrote:
On 2/18/11 5:42 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net[2011-02-18 11:15]:
Alias are enter with /32.
huh? hell no.
OK, but all examples show it as
On 2/18/11 3:45 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
On 2/18/11 3:23 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net
wrote:
On 2/18/11 5:42 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net [2011-02-18 11:15]:
Alias are enter with /32.
huh? hell
On 2/19/11 12:51 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net wrote:
On 2/18/11 3:45 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
On 2/18/11 3:23 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
Unless you refer at me writing /32 instead of the long way 255.255.255.255?
Ah, yes, I thought
On 2/23/11 5:34 PM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
On 02/23/2011 08:59 AM, Ana Zgombic wrote:
you mind to turn it on sometimes? What browser do you use (lynx,
firefox, chromium, ...)?
not much choice. firefox.
Regrettably, it is.
Firefox is now more about:
* users are too stupid to read
Hi,
I am testing various hardware processor, however I can't get one of each
type, money is not endless.
But I came across this statement for this Intel card:
Intel. EXPI9404PTL PCI-E PRO/1000 PT Quad Port Low Profile Server Adapter
Additionally, the Intel PRO/1000 PT Quad Port Server
OK. Anyway NIC buffers restrict buffered packets number. But the problem
remain: why a (for exemple) dual Xeon E5520@2.27GHz with Intel PRO/1000
(82576) can't route 150kpps without Ierr :-)
http://www.oxymium.net/tmp/core3-dmesg
Just an idea, but may be it very well could have something to do
Hi,
Would it be possible to get some clarification on what would work and
not for the 10Gb Intel network cards?
I compare the man page, both man(4) ixgb and man(4) ix as well as the
hardware section and looked at the data from Intel to find more in
trying to answer that question.
But I am
Hi,
I was testing routing with this box to see what could be done and when
use in full duplex mode routing traffic with tcpbench on servers at
either side of this box and this one as a router in between, I get this
crash after a timeout of the watchdog.
Only happen when I process traffic in
On 3/3/11 3:28 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:09:36PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to get some clarification on what would work
and not for the 10Gb Intel network cards?
I compare the man page, both man(4) ixgb and man(4) ix as well
Hi Jonathan,
The intel product documents are confused about which chips they
use. The clearest split is something along the lines of:
7 82599EB -- PCI Express* (PCIe*) 2.0, dual port 10 Gigabit
Ethernet controller
7 82599ES -- Serial 10 GbE backplane interface for blade
On 3/3/11 3:16 PM, FRLinux wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net wrote:
On this one, I will make a leap of fate here. I suppose you are right. Would
be nice to know for sure anyway. The only way to know if for me to gt one I
guess and test it for real.
leap
On 3/3/11 3:51 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 02:35:58PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
There are mentions of 82598 10GbaseT working, I don't see why
82599 10GbaseT wouldn't work off hand.
That could well be, but I learn many years ago to do my homework
first on hardware
On 3/3/11 3:28 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Daniel,
Can you try this diff? It won't get rid of the watchdog timeout, but
hopefully it will prevent the DMA error.
Hi Mark,
Here is the results for this.
Sorry it took me so long to get to test it.
It does make a difference and I will test more
On 3/4/11 7:40 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
On 3/3/11 3:28 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Daniel,
Can you try this diff? It won't get rid of the watchdog timeout, but
hopefully it will prevent the DMA error.
Follow up on my previous email, I let it run 12 hours so far with as
much traffic I
On 3/5/11 1:49 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 07:40:59 -0500
From: Daniel Ouelletdan...@presscom.net
I get pretty much a symetric traffic of ~43.5Mbps each direction using
tcpbench as before.
Then after may be one minute, both side will cut off oppose to before
when only one
On 3/30/11 7:23 PM, Scott McEachern wrote:
On 03/30/11 19:18, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Amit Kulkarniamitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-31 01:09]:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Henning
Brauerlists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Amit Kulkarniamitk...@gmail.com [2011-03-31 00:45]:
Nothing directly, just
On 4/5/11 12:07 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-04-04, Stuart VanZeestua...@datalinesys.com wrote:
Don't be silly. While Lions do provide excelent physical security
they don't provide any data security at all.
I love animals: I'm always talking about animals, I love 'em. But
the thing
Men,
This is a long list of emails. I read them all for fun. You want to know
where to start, then you can simply do very simple things if you want as
simple as taking the code and check for very simple style(9) stuff as
simple as.
spacespacespacetab
for example. style(9) is very specific
n0g0013 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Development is not the same process as writing a whiny mail.
that is a shame. i can probably better understand the relectance to
re-visit this if it has failed before. perhaps, others are right,
perhaps linux can tolerate it because it's not as good as
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
You cannot, of course. But janitor being a rookie doesn't imply he doesn't know
what he's doing. He could be doing a job that doesn't require any special
knowledge - like rewriting documentation into a different format, fixing HTML
correctness, fixing typos and unclear
Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Maybe the outsiders just cannot find the PR database. I put
openbsd pr database into google and looked into all links on the first
page. The pr database is always mentioned, but never linked. Where is it?
This only again proof the point of waisting time try to help. How
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 05:16:06PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
So, start by sending diff's then. Almost every diff's I saw sent in, got
reply one way or an other.
My recent experiences differ, for my last 2 submissions (an issue with
swig, sent to ports@ after
This include example and full diff's below as well.
May be this is a waist of time, but will see.
Some say they needs some details, then here is an example, and this took
me only about 30 minutes or so from start to finish, including getting
the source tree.
Doesn't mean it will be pick up,
bofh wrote:
I just read man top. So, just to confirm, for those without ability
to read the source, or understand it, the nice cpu processor state is
the percentage of time spent on niced processes. Someone mentioned he
was not sure if it was 1-20, or includes -1 to -20. From the way the
man
Chris wrote:
However, typing newaliases still gives the mailwrapper.core
segmentation fault core dumped error. I have had postfix installed
which I removed (pkg_delete) after the upgrade. Could this be the
cause of this problem? I manually deleted the _postfix user/group
after I restored the
Juan Miscaro wrote:
You recommend a production server to be running -current?
Poll: who here is doing that?
I do. Actually started about a year and half ago or so. Not every
servers, but most and I see no reason not to if you fell OK with OpenBSD
at large. The real reason is I find it
Hi,
I am trying to find a way ti identifying sparse files properly and
quickly and find a way to rectify the situation.
Any trick to do this?
The problem is that overtime looks like I am ending up with lots of them
and because I have to sync multiples servers together the sparse files
Any clue as to how to tackle this problem, or any trick around it?
I really do not understand the problem here. But you might be able to
detect sparse files compartaring the size vs the number of blocks it uses.
Without making a bit writing out of it. Let say that the problem is for
now a
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 11/9/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for example, a source file that is sparse badly, don't really have
allocated disk block yet, but when copy over, via scp, or rsync will
actually use that space on the destination servers. All the servers are
identical
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
So your problem seems to be that rsync -S is inefficient to the point
where it is not useable. I do not use rsync a lot, so I do not know
if there's a solution to that problem. It does seem strange that a
feature to solve a problem actually make the problem worse.
Well,
Hi,
Before we go nuts on this issue, or look for the wrong things or create
miss understanding.
Just allow me a little bit more time to try to come with a viseable
example showing the problem, or the issue here.
Obviously as Otto pointed out to me, looks like I can't explain it to well.
I
Hi,
I will try to make this very simple and show the issue by example only
when possible. I use two old servers on the Internet for the tests. The
source use real example sparse file, but that have only ~1GB of usable
data in it. The size show by 'ls -al' as an example gives~17GB. That's
ropers wrote:
Would people say that this edit is a decent description of these issues?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sparse_filediff=170645177oldid=168346326
I can't really comment well for proper writing for sure. (;
But one thing that is not right as Otto pointed out to me and
knitti wrote:
if I'm not completely wrong, you could always tar -czf the sparse file, scp the
archive and then tar -xzf the file in place in the other side. this should also
create a new sparse file. of course, you lose the rsyncabilty and you have to
identify your sparse file in advance. But
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Only two things here.
1. you have to identify your sparse file in advance.
That is the question. Look at the title.
Hi, Daniel.
Did you look at the Perl script I sent?
I am playing with it and looking if that can help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you look at the Perl script I sent?
I should also add in my previous emails in regards to good and bad part
of it that it is actually a much better idea then what I was doing by
the way! I think my emails didn't come out right in regard to the idea
express
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
I tried making a very sparse file (100 MB data, 1000 GB sparseness) and
gave up trying to compress it. gzip has to process the whole thing,
sparseness and all. Sure it would probably end up with a very small
file, but the whole thing has to be processed.
Yes it does
RW wrote:
What has not been addressed here is the question of what created those
files. It isn't something you do with a shell script usually.
Many things can do this, or could use this.
So if you have, just as an example, a database program that does make
such a file it is often possible to
Rafa3 Brodewicz wrote:
I didn't find expat.8.0 on any server.
So, is this dependency ok?
did you install xbase?
http://openbsd.org/faq/upgrade42.html#libexpat
David Zeillinger wrote:
Did you happen to investigate why rsync -S is taking so much time? If it
doesn't deal with sparse file the way one expects, this option is
probably broken. Also have you already tried something like the advice
in
Clint Pachl wrote:
I've done a lot of network and DMZ design research over the last 3 days.
I've looked at hundreds of websites and newsgroup postings and read the
following titles:
The best security setup are the simplest one that you can look at your
pf configuration and understand very
Hi,
You may have seen a few posts from me on this box. I continue to try to
isolate the problem as much as possible with it and it's now narrow to a
more specific setup in the current kernel, but still this box WILL NOT
be stable what so ever if use with the amd64.mp kernel.
I am running
I've read all the relevant boot and rc type manuals and they only give
a vague reference to starting programs with
rc.local or rc.conf.local. I want to start wpa_supplicant and I
haven't seen any variables for doing it. Some OS's have
the /usr/local/etc/rc.d directory for such purposes.
It's
Just for the records.
Here is what help some for the stability in BIOS:
* Hotplug USB FDD Support[Disabled] *
* Hotplug USB CDROM Support [Disabled] *
Everything is default, or as F9 would put it when you load optimum
setting in BIOS. Then you only need to
Hi,
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong. I am trying to trace a
bug and I am not sure where it is really, but I got a possible idea I
want to check for if that make sense.
My understanding's is that all drives are using an abstraction layer
between the kernel and the drivers
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 11/26/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding's is that all drives are using an abstraction layer
between the kernel and the drivers itself.
Now, I don't know if there is a difference between drivers for a single
processor kernel and a multiple core
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 11/26/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding's is that all drives are using an abstraction layer
between the kernel and the drivers itself.
Now, I don't know if there is a difference between drivers for a single
processor kernel and a multiple core
David Gwynne wrote:
what is the bug you're able to reproduce?
I posted it on misc@ and reply on an email with the same hardware
problem on tech@ and open a but report as well on it.
But the short story of it is that using amd64.mp kernel on Sun X4100 M2
I can crash the box at will by
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/11/26 18:21, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
One more question for you if I may.
As far as you know, does this difference interrupt processing is also use
for UBS devices as well by any chance?
yes, and everything else that uses interrupts.
(/sys/arch/i386/config
Stuart Henderson wrote:
save dmesg from the various different kernels and use diff to see what
changes between them.
I didn't see in your posts to this thread whether you've compared
with/without acpi? (recent snapshots should enable acpi automatically
if you have 1 cpu/core and you'll see
Not sure if that mean anything what so ever.
But when the box rebooted itself, this time I got this in ddb. All
frozen, but the display show this:
Not sure for the end of the line here = 0. Could be something else, but
I can't see it.
kkeerrnneell:: pprrootteeccttiioonn f a u l t t r a
Hi,
Is there a possible simple trick to generate dummy interrupts in a
control fashion on an AMD system for testing?
So, that I could increase the constant level of interrupts that the
server would need to process per seconds as an example?
So, far it doesn't look like the problem is with
# cd /usr/src
# tar xzf /tmp/sys.tar.gz
# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/conf
# config GENERIC.MP
Don't forget to run make depend
Kernel options have changed -- you must run make clean
# cd /usr
# cvs -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs get src/sys
...
Lots of output.
...
# cd /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/conf
#
Karl Sjodahl - dunceor wrote:
config(8) has changed and need to be rebuilt first.
If you wanna follow current always check:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
OK, I got cut. I usually check there, but this time around I didn't.
I checked instead if an earlier version worked and it did.
Hi,
I need some help here to narrow this down more or may be someone might
find the answer quickly.
I have pinpoint the crash/reboot for the Sun X4100 to the usage of the
Ultra160: enable dual xfers, even if I think it is U360, but I could
be wrong. Couldn't find the specs just yet. In any
David Gwynne wrote:
this diff cannot affect the behavior of your system. the code below
deals with domain validation on SPI mpi variants while the x4100 uses
SAS mpi. the code you patched isnt run on your machine.
Not sure I understand your statement, but as a test, I did exactly that
and I
David Gwynne wrote:
On 29/11/2007, at 4:51 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
David Gwynne wrote:
this diff cannot affect the behavior of your system. the code below
deals with domain validation on SPI mpi variants while the x4100 uses
SAS mpi. the code you patched isnt run on your machine
David Gwynne wrote:
On 29/11/2007, at 4:51 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
David Gwynne wrote:
this diff cannot affect the behavior of your system. the code below
deals with domain validation on SPI mpi variants while the x4100 uses
SAS mpi. the code you patched isnt run on your machine
Stuart Henderson wrote:
Now, if that's not use, how can this be then?
mpi(4) is used, but dlg is saying that the part of it you touched
relates to other cards supported by the mpi driver. You could add some
printf if you want to check for yourself.
I got that part on my second reading of the
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/11/28 16:47, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I don't know x4100 m2, is this an optional card, or meant to always
be there?
No there isn't any cards that I added or anything. The difference you see is
that the server also have RAID controller built in and as such will show
Stuart Henderson wrote:
Well, it's certainly a bit odd that amd64 doesn't detect the ipmi, and i386
does... I don't really have any other clues though :(
Looking in all my dmesg and all 4 servers, I sure can confirm this.
i386 bring it as:
ipmi0 at mainbus0: version 1.5 interface KCS iobase
David Gwynne wrote:
this diff cannot affect the behavior of your system. the code below
deals with domain validation on SPI mpi variants while the x4100 uses
SAS mpi. the code you patched isnt run on your machine.
Not sure I understand your statement, but as a test, I did exactly
that and I
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/11/28 16:47, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I don't know x4100 m2, is this an optional card, or meant to always
be there?
No there isn't any cards that I added or anything. The difference you see is
that the server also have RAID controller built in and as such will show
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/11/28 21:00, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
Well, it's certainly a bit odd that amd64 doesn't detect the ipmi, and i386
does... I don't really have any other clues though :(
Ah. It's not odd at all...
revision 1.139
Jake Conk wrote:
I have to keep coming here each couple of days to check if that is
full and delete them. My question is, is this normal and I just
created my /var mount too small? I think the fact that my pflog is
that big is the actual problem, does anyone know of a way to fix this?
Well,
Marco Peereboom wrote:
I will dig my x4100 out of storage any day now. Last time I used it it
was stable on i386 and amd64.
Only amd64.mp is not stable ( and only in writing to the disk) , amd64
is stable as well as either i386 kernel are stable. And in case it does
make a difference, it's
Please note that postfix does not undergo the rigorous code scrub
that sendmail goes through.
[...]
Will you please cut the crap? Thank you.
Unlike Sendmail, Postfix was written from scratch with security
in mind. It had only one published security flaw since its first
public release
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/11/28 22:27, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I guess, that may be the only valid course of action here then. That may be
shown by the difference in the iic1 code in dmesg between not working boot
and stable one where so far, I am up to three time out of may be 50 or 60
Quick question on the rules of this if I may.
What's the rules, kind of used to determine when new PCI ID can be put
in the pcidevs in the tree?
If I find new ID's, do they need to be verify by users first, etc?
In looking at my SAS problem, I find that Symbios Logic may have
0x0066 Symbios
Jake Conk wrote:
Thanks guys for your replies... I'll try to cut down on the all the
useless logging I'm doing but when I opened the log files up to see
what was inside them I only saw all this binary stuff. I assume thats
not what's supposed to be in the pflogs right? Any ideas why I'm
getting
Ant feedback on this part?
So, is it possible based on the logs I sent that it is in the DMA part
of the mp kernel here?
Still digging, but wanted to get some feedback as if it was possible or
am I looking totally in the wrong direction.
Fine if you tell me I am full of sh*t too. (;
Just
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
David Kaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're interested in VoIP, then you might want to look at
wengophone, ( http://www.openwengo.com ), it seems to be basically
the same thing, but it's GPL'd and the linux version is kept up to
date. It might be easier to get
Marco Peereboom wrote:
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news.
I like that one! (; Started my day on a good note.
Always thought Fox News was really bad, but felt many disagree.
Marco Peereboom wrote:
Yesterday I dug up a whole lot of stuff and I was able to see my x4100.
Next time I should be able to get it home. Sorry for the delay.
Please Marco, don't be sorry. Just for you agree to look into this is
already very much appreciated!
Anything I can do to help,
701 - 800 of 1128 matches
Mail list logo
