Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-10 Thread E.T
Hi all I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD. I watch the ARM processors / Geode but they are less powerful and expensive for a complete solution. I also looked at the solution Soekris but is expensive compared to D510mo from Intel. In the doc OpenBSD i386:

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-10 Thread E.T
yes, exactly !!! See my complete post before. On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:02:23 -0400, Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com wrote: FRLinux wrote: On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Joachim Schipper joac...@joachimschipper.nl wrote: I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD. Okay, but what

Processeur Atom

2010-06-10 Thread E.T
Hi In this text, I have a athlon1 available. But it takes a lot of room, very hot, a lot of noise, and consumes much electricity. I try to disconnect the fan to see, but the CPU temperature was up to 105 B0 C in 5 minutes. Otherwise, OpenBSD operating nickel above, I installed all the packets,

Re: Processeur Atom

2010-06-10 Thread E.T
In fact, there is color, the buttons work. That's cool :) Tanks Maybe, but it beats the pants off the old Asus eeePC I had. It's a netbook. I use it for portable productivity, coding, testing and web surfing... not as an Internet gateway/FW. -- @plus

Re: Processeur Atom

2010-06-10 Thread E.T
very, very small processor. N270 best performance? . Firewall or desktop ? OpenBSD 4.6-current (RAMDISK_CD) #149: Mon Sep 14 04:31:59 MDT 2009 t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 1.60 GHz

Re: Aspire One VGA (Intel 82945GME Video) not working in current but works in release

2010-06-10 Thread E.T
Hi I also crash X server. My graphics controller is an Intel GMA 3150 tested with OpenBSD 4.7. On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:17:27 +0200, Dusty riverdu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I've recently installed OpenBSD 4.7 Release on my laptop, an Acer Aspire One with SSD. Enjoying the improved performance I

Re: GMA 3150 (Was: Re: Aspire One VGA (Intel 82945GME Video) not working in current but works in release)

2010-06-11 Thread E.T
Sorry On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:17:25 +0200, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote: On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:32:56 +0200 E.T ad...@wordpress-fr.fr wrote: Hi I also crash X server. My graphics controller is an Intel GMA 3150 tested with OpenBSD 4.7. Don't hijack threads. Search

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-11 Thread E.T
Tank you Sean, I'll try to respond to your message Indeed, a firewall is not a desktop. On the site openbsd.org is indicated support for OpenBSD i386 processors Atom platform. But it is not clear Atom1, Atom2, while the responses were made, are on Atom1. A firewall must be 100% supported by the

Re: Processeur Atom

2010-06-11 Thread E.T
:35:05 -0400, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote: On 6/10/10 4:06 PM, E.T wrote: My main question and therefore, is that OpenBSD supports a 100%, the atom D510?. The X server is configured with more time. But there will be no more bugs or conflicts later, more severe and troublesome

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-12 Thread E.T
* Nick n...@holland-consulting.net [2010-06-11 12:55]: If you want low power consumption and low cost, I'd suggest a small PIII or Celeron based system, hard to beat for the price (usually, free!). IF the new, cool stuff has any real power savings, you are unlikely to ever recoup the initial

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-12 Thread E.T
Well, good interesting thoughts. Heh PIII and low performance when comparing with Atom? Are you sure that you know design and construction of Atom? ;-) Same with low puissance, about hot and electricity...there is PIII mobile and then PIII-M which was predecessor to Pentium M mother card

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-12 Thread E.T
Saving 10 watts will save you (0.01kW * 24h * 365) = 87.6kWh per year. Realistic savings might be around 20 watts, for a 35-40 watt P3 and 15-20W Atom. Calculate for yourself if it is worth it. The future is processor ARM, Openbsd suppoorted ARM is good way. This month, canoncial and

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-12 Thread E.T
Are you sure that you know function of data center? Or maybe it's not standard in France, but here you have : access restrictions to datacenter with pictures, personal data, cameras are everywhere with long enough backup of data, encoded racks so only you or persons you allowed have access to

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-12 Thread E.T
Can't find any physical. Only those like this one http://tinyurl.com/hsbcbreach which is from employee of HSBC and those datacenters are managed by different people and companies. Which is in fact just confirmation that most of the problems come from inside of companies. Because it's much

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-12 Thread E.T
It looks same http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=29035 , same cache size, same speed, no virtualization support and 510 has worse consumption, maybe because of integrated VGA. Why they don't specify eg. FSB for D510? Because it's worse? i86 is still same crap (and those

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-12 Thread E.T
Et en quoi l'iPad est le futur de l'informatique ? Pourquoi donc n'y a-t-il pas d'ARM multiprocesseurs ou multicoeurs ? Pourquoi donc n'utilise-t-on jamais de processeurs ARM lorsque l'on a des besoins importants en entrC)es/sorties, par exemple pour des serveurs de fichiers ou de base de

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-12 Thread E.T
A buildings a building and it depends on what measures are taken. At a data center who knows who should be where. At home you can remove secure from ttys asking for password on boot -s use solanoids which lock the metal case to the pc from bios setting and set the bios to prevent boot without

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-12 Thread E.T
I'm not sure what you're saying, aside from cages are good? Data centres are often complicated and have many with keys or lockpics, kvms or people leaving fingerprints around etc and the machines have been rebooted a lot, without precautions. We've always said fingerprint readers were

Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-12 Thread E.T
Thank you for all the answers, I think we went around the issue. bye

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-13 Thread E.T
Hence the question of having a powerful processor? One Debian turns with a facility has gnC)nC)rique 800mhz, good work. Processor mult-core 3.00ghz not utility for firewall and desktop. On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:44:37 +0100, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: I can also show you PIII

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-13 Thread E.T
Sorry, my english is very bad ... On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:47:08 +0100, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:08:28 +0200 E.T ad...@wordpress-fr.fr wrote: Hence the question of having a powerful processor? One Debian turns with a facility has gnC)nC)rique

Firewall matériel

2010-06-17 Thread E.T
Hi tous Comme, j'ai eu des dizaines de retours intC)ressants avec mon post Processeur Atom , dont plusieurs disait en gros : la plateforme Atom est pas cher, mais nulle en performance( 80 euros ), Le soekris est bon , mais c'est trC)s faible en puissance et coC;te une fortune (230 euros). Pour

Re: Processeur Atom ?

2010-06-22 Thread E.T
Yes Small webiste personal = server at home big project = datacenter We agree why pay 100dollars/month, 1200dollars/yaer for a server ???. because you get what you pay for. maintaining a sane secure reliable data center isn't exactly cheap. -- @plus

Re: OT: Australia may allow punitive damages for security vulns

2010-06-22 Thread E.T
One hangover :) On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:24:43 -0500, Chris Bennett ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote: Marco Peereboom wrote: Microsoft spends $10B on RD. That is nearly the ENTIRE budget of NASA. They are the classic example of organizations that are completely out of control and rely

Re: [openbsd] fwd: [dera...@cvs.openbsd.org: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/03/linux_kernel_vulnerability/]

2010-06-22 Thread E.T
Quote from theo : - our kernels have no bugs On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:26:18 +0200, pourl...@hushmail.com wrote: Hello misc, I was wondering if these accusations against OpenBSD were true, I doubt he is lying, maybe he is just not telling the whole truth.

Re: Phoronix Test Suite

2010-06-23 Thread E.T
Hi Very good performance putty :) On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:36:38 +0200, Ektor WetterstrC6m ektw...@gmail.com wrote: I know http://bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ is wrong / outdated / non-scientific / whatever... But what about this? Phoronix has more credibility imho...