On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Bray Mailloux wrote:
Have a patch been issued? It might just be the time servers, but date is
reporting 11:04:31 when it is 12:05.
The ntp protocol always works with UTC, no patch needed.
Apart from that, this is a lousy report. No details on servers or
client settings.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:34:36AM -0500, Jason Sidabras wrote:
/etc/fstab (line of interest):
/dev/sd0a /pub_raid ffs rw,noexec,softdep 0 2
I can't seem to edit my fstab in single user mode because everything
is ro. System has 2GB of real memory and is running bsd.mp GENERIC. I
You can
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:25:53PM -0500, Jason Sidabras wrote:
Thanks Ted and Chris,
I have to go pick up some more RAM, i don't have a system I can take down to
shift this over.
That won't help. You are running into MAXDSIZE, which is not increased
by adding RAM.
-Otto
Jason
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:00:44AM -0700, sexyboy wrote:
Hi All,
I have applied the 004 and 005 patches and I still have a same problem.
The named kick itself out, I can not see anything suspicious in a log file
the only massage is when hit top command I can see this:
PID USERNAME PRI
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 07:49:56PM +0200, Jean-G?rard Pailloncy wrote:
Hi,
I have a mail server that suffers a strange size for /var/db/spamd.
# ls -l /var/db/spamd
-rw--- 1 _spamd _spamd 167657472 Oct 6 19:45 /var/db/spamd
# spamdb | wc -l
16784
167 Mbytes for 16784
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:40:54PM +0200, Jean-G?rard Pailloncy wrote:
berkeley db files appear larger than they are: it uses sparse files.
Check with ls -S or du for the actual blocks used.
# du -k spamd
131120 spamd
That is a little to much, is'nt it ?
Yes, it is pretty big. No idea
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:01:04AM +0200, henrik hansen wrote:
Hi guys,
i'm trying to use a temperature and humidity sensor with a openbsd i386.
I developed a c program with can read the sensor. i used debian to
develop the tool.
Now i'm trying to migrate the program to openbsd. but it
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 12:44:43PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Peter J. Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not just seeing this wrong I hope. Let me explain:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/if_tun.c
when looking at the top seeing
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:49:11PM -0200, Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install openBSD 4.3 -stable in a IBM System X3550 7879
(https://www-304.ibm.com/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisplay?lndocid=M
IGR-64315brandind=508 ) but install didn4t found hard
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:29:52AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
mak maxie wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
Ah, so that's why Windows has proven so resistant to spyware
and
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:58:27PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm experiencing a very bad network performance, when I try to connect
to a remote server.
The point-to-point connection is a E3 line, with 34MBit/s, with a cisco 2800
router on each side, terminating
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install OpenBSD 4.4 on a serveur (HP DL120
G5) to test the
functionality of the raid (seens it works again .).
I configure the first
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:03:37PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:59:29PM -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:39:46PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 04:31:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just try to install
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 07:03:35AM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:45:47PM +0100, Christophe Rioux wrote:
I try to mount an USB disk using FAQ14
(http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html)
dmesg:
umass0 at uhub0 port 4 configuration 1 interface 0 Cypress
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:16:32PM -0500, Jonathan Steel wrote:
Hi
In the SIGCHLD signal handler of parent process, I need to get the pid
of the child when the child dies. To do this I'm using sigaction with
the SA_SIGINFO flag. But the siginfo_t-si_pid member does not seem to
be set.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 02:29:23PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Jonathan Steel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the SIGCHLD signal handler of parent process, I need to get the pid of
the child when the child dies. To do this I'm using sigaction with the
SA_SIGINFO
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:40:59PM +0530, Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
Hello,
I'm not aware if this has been brought up here before, didn't know how
to search for this particular question through the archives, so
writing to the list.
Pardon me if I'm repeating.
I'm under OpenBSD 4.2 running
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:49:21AM +, Tom Van Looy wrote:
No, check the ksh man page.
Or, you could use the /usr/bin/time command to just avoid the ksh builtin.
/usr/bin/time java helloWorld time.report 21
Which works as expected.
That depends very much on your expectations.
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork
trouble, so I decided to make a single change in the GENERIC
kernel config: I bumped up the maxusers setting to 128.
Config warned me that config: warning: maxusers
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork
trouble, so I decided to make
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:09:12PM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 08:10:20PM -0800, Anirban Sinha wrote:
I hope I will get some response to this. If not, I will assume that
there is really no interest in fixing bugs in openntpd and in that case,
I will patch only our local copy of the ntpd codebase (as opposed to
reporting to the
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:05:05AM -0600, Todd Alan Smith wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Anirban Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope I will get some response to this. If not, I will assume that
there is really no interest in fixing bugs in openntpd and in that case,
Why would
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 09:57:25PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Anirban Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is yet another bug in Openntpd. This is direct copy-paste from
openntpd code (ntpd.c:main()):
do {
if ((pid = wait(NULL)) == -1
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 02:59:52PM +0100, Tim Saueressig, thepixelz.com wrote:
hi list,
i tried to build my userland but it suddenly stops.
this is current from today via anoncvs.de.openbsd.org
I suspect the mirror was partly updated. Try again after a new cvs up.
-Otto
---
===
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 03:24:42PM -0500, (private) HKS wrote:
I recently built out an OpenBSD backup server on a Dell 2950
with a 2.7TB RAID array, and I ran into some trouble with fdisk
recognizing my disk. The geometries it reported were worth
about 750GB. Attempting to change CHS geometry
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 06:46:13PM +0100, Floor Terra wrote:
Hi,
While browsing the manpages for getopt(3), I stumbled upon getarg(3).
Can someone point me to getarg.h? Even the online manpage[1] can't
find it[2].
locate(1) is your friend. It's a kerberos specific file:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 09:47:45AM +0001, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 08:03:30PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 06:46:13PM +0100, Floor Terra wrote:
Hi,
While browsing the manpages for getopt(3), I stumbled upon getarg(3).
Can someone point
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 01:06:17AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Denis Doroshenko
denis.doroshe...@gmail.com wrote:
even if it worked, you won't be able to run fsck after the fact.
could you please be more informative? won't it work because of FFS2 or
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
2008/12/30 Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de:
Virtualization promises isolation, and doesn't even remotely keep
that promise, today, regardless of the implementation.
That makes it, for now, both a security and
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:03:47PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi Misc@,
is there anything on man (8) how to set irq allocation for certain
devices like NICs? I tried apropos but I can't find userland application
on base to change this.
Thanks,
In general allocating IRQs is a kernel
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:48:57PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:29:01 +0700, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 03:03:47PM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi Misc@,
is there anything on man (8) how to set irq allocation for certain
devices like
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:25:06 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:03:57PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
I have two printers on the local network (laser and lexmark) and I want
to use lpd(8) to print on them
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:28:22AM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:24:05 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:25:06 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:03:57PM +0200
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:44:09PM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:37:29 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:28:22AM +0200, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:24:05 +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0200
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:40:42AM -0400, Todd C. Miller wrote:
The (existing) abuse of toprec is a bit kludgy but this should fix
the problem for now.
yes it does, also tested termcap and termlib db creation. But you are
right, the code is a bit ugly,
-Otto
- todd
Index:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:47:59PM -0700, James Hozier wrote:
I'm doing dd
if=/dev/random of=/dev/wd0c
Never use the block device for anything other than mounting.
Also, specify a block size. Something like
dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/rwd0c bs=64k
The r is really important. Play with the
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:57:50PM +0200, Stefan Unterweger wrote:
* Pascal Stumpf on Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:39:48PM +0200:
Check your /var/log/lpd.errs.
Doesn't contain anything but restarted messages.
Also, ktracing lpd with the the -i flag might give a clue to what the
lpd
Op 5 nov. 2011 om 00:46 heeft Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com het volgende
geschreven:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011, Johan Ryberg wrote:
Hi
Just read this: http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/102
Claiming that OpenBSD 5.0 is affected
Is it?
Red Hat does not consider crash of
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 11:34:08AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Op 5 nov. 2011 om 00:46 heeft Ted Unangst t...@tedunangst.com het volgende
geschreven:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011, Johan Ryberg wrote:
Hi
Just read this: http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/102
Claiming
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 03:54:14PM +0100, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-11-06 21.42, David Vasek wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Benny Lofgren wrote:
On 2011-11-06 18.00, Bambero wrote:
Thanks, but without skip=1 dd will copy partition table and mbr too
(first block 521b).
So it may damage
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:57:34AM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
On Nov 11 17:40:01, John Tate wrote:
Fixed that now getting...
# mount smass:/home /mhome/
Cannot MNT PRC: RPC: Program not registered
is mountd even running?
and portmap for that matter?
-Otto
On Fri, Nov 11,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:29:28PM +0100, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On 29-11-2011 11:38, T. Valent wrote:
dmassage -t
i might be wrong, but is this really aggressive auto spelling
corrector for dmesg?
I found an example usage of dmassage on the web, but could not find the
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:08:38PM +0100, T. Valent wrote:
@marc
If you really want that, tell us how much you're prepared to spend, maybe
someone would be willing to sell you time to solve that very specific
problem
since obviously, no OpenBSD developer wants to do it for free, as it's
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:47:54AM +0100, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
Hi!
I can't get my around this:
$ pwd
/home/daniell
$ cd ~/stuff/
ksh: cd: /home/daniell/~/stuff - No such file or directory
$ cd ~/stuff/
$ pwd
/home/daniell/stuff
It seems ~ is substituted in the first case,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 03:44:11PM +0100, Francois Pussault wrote:
Hi
add the following
lines to the bottom of your .kshrc file in your /root directory:
set -o emacs
alias __A=$(print '\0020') # ^P = up = previous command
alias __B=$(print '\0016') # ^N = down = next command
alias
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:21:11PM +0400, Wesley M. wrote:
Hi,
When i do a newfs on HD 500Go , it takes much more times using
OpenBSD 4.9 instead of 5.0 RELEASE.
Same problem using fsck -y dev. Why ?
Machine : mac mini
model : A1347
Thank you very much for your replies.
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:43:47PM +0500, ??? wrote:
hello!
I'm running multihomed server (two servers in carp cluster).
say carp5 is default route and carp2 is another ISP. I want to see
outgoing packets in the interface they came in. I supposed, it could
be done using reply-to
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:21:20PM +, keith wrote:
On 22/12/2011 21:36, Keith wrote:
I am having some trouble getting 4 x 2TB sata disks into one big
single softraid (raid 5) disk. I can create the softraid0 disk and
it's 5.5TB want would like to get a single 5.5TB partition but can
only
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:21:50AM +0500, ??? wrote:
Hello!
I used to run FreeBSD and Linux for years, but not that familiar with
OpenBSD yet.
we are running buggy server (I suspect RAM), it hangs sometimes and it
takes about 30 minutes to fsck 7Tb partition.
however, there are
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 01:17:26PM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Otto Moerbeek [o...@drijf.net] wrote:
There are several way to speedup fsck which are available now:
- Use larger block and fragment sizes when doing a newfs, of course
this requires rebuilding the file system
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:31:40AM +0100, David Vasek wrote:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
There are several way to speedup fsck which are available now:
- Use larger block and fragment sizes when doing a newfs, of course
this requires rebuilding the file system
- Recent
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 06:01:31PM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
These words you keep on using... I don't think they mean what you think
they mean.
That's ok because I'm the one who keeps on using them, not you. But I
meant what I wrote just so you know.
Noone is holding you at gunpoint
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:43:30PM +, keith wrote:
Hi, I have build a graylog2 server with obsd 5.0 x64 but can't
figure out how to get the some of the programs to auto start, They
all start when run as root but only the mogod one starts up at boot
time. Can anyone help ?
if [ -x
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:38:37AM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 03:28:37PM +0100, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
Hey Henning,
off-topic diatribes? coming to this mailing list asking for help about
a 4 year old release when it is clearly documented that you are
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 03:20:20PM +0200, Vitali wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Francois Pussault
fpussa...@contactoffice.fr wrote:
I prefer to define my parts manualy like this
A / 256Mo
enough free space on the fastest disk in the machine
[cut]
When your /var will be
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:20:07PM +0200, Vitali wrote:
There is one more philosophical side effect of this question - speed.
The closer the partition is placed to the outer cylinders, the faster
the data are read from it.
More a methaphysical question. On modern disks, the
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:50:08AM -0500, Richard Thornton wrote:
Is this the most recent current version for sparc64 and does this imply
that I have the true current kernel running, thus my PKG_PATH should be
set to pull for the current set of packages?
You are mistaken. Latets snapshots are
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 03:23:36PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jan 19 13:02:33, David Coppa wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Giridhari giridh...@live.com.au wrote:
HELO.
I am following http://openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#NFS and have the server
running, and showmount shows an
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:20:44PM +0100, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
Hi,
I have a vm that I upgraded to 5.1-beta last week some time. One of my
software's is getting a compiler warning now that it didn't get in 5.0.
---
cc -Wall -g -I/usr/local/include/db4 -c reply.c
reply.c: In
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:20:44PM +0100, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
Hi,
I have a vm that I upgraded to 5.1-beta last week some time. One of my
software's is getting a compiler warning now that it didn't get in 5.0.
---
cc -Wall -g -I/usr/local/include/db4 -c reply.c
reply.c: In
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:09:13PM +0100, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:22:37PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
cc -Wall -g -I/usr/local/include/db4 -c reply.c
reply.c: In function 'create_anyreply':
reply.c:2975: warning: array size (2) smaller than bound length (4
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:15:29PM +0100, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
there aren't all that many repositories the size of ours out there.
That's true.
But no Henning, i don't believe it's that;
you know, it's just that i don't have anything to say, because
i have
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 10:39:59AM +0100, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Maxim Bourmistrov
m...@alumni.chalmers.se wrote:
Hi misc@,
my question is probably directed to devs working with/on PF.
Is something like table sync is planed to implement in PF?
eg:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 07:17:10AM +, Mik J wrote:
Thank you Theo,
But what would be the workaround to get a similar result ?
- Mail original -
@ : Mik J mikyde...@yahoo.fr
I have not
found how to get an equivalent of /etc/libmap.conf
on OpenBSD
I'm
following a
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:16:10PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote [2012-02-03 12:47+0100]:
I like to say that long delays I have seen when using cvs had to do
with multiple different values of CVS/Root files in my local tree.
Otto, could you please elaborate?
How does
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 07:52:44AM -0500, Jiri B wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:16:10PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
+it maybe wise to issue a command sequence like the following:
+pre
+ # strongcd /usr/src/strong
+ # strongfind . -path '*CVS/Root' | xargs rm/strong
+ # strongcvs -d
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 06:15:50PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
Replying to myself,
[snip]
Things might change if (1) the cvsroot is remote (2) it is not
the same for all files. I will try that next.
Jan
That last case (remote repo's and different Roots) is the actual case I
have
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:16:25PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
On Feb 09 20:10:11, Jan Stary wrote:
On Feb 09 18:54:45, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
BTW, AFAIK, cvs -d up does not write Root files.
It does:
cd /usr/src
ftp -o - ftp://MIRROR/pub/OpenBSD/5.0/sys.tar.gz | tar xzpf
cd sys
Op 13 feb. 2012 om 17:19 heeft Josh Grosse j...@jggimi.homeip.net het
volgende geschreven:
I just wonder if this is unusual or abnormal. For the last few months, my
local
repository has not been recursively building working directories with
checkout.
For example:
$ echo $CVSROOT
/cvs
$ cd
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:10:27PM +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:05 -0300,
Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@haesbaert.org a icrit :
Hello,
With a decent hardware, I think you can reach 1mpps (that's million
packets per second).
I don't think.
As far
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:53:17PM +0500, ??? wrote:
hello!
we are running CARP-ed load balancers (carp over different vlans).
it was running just great with 6 carp addresses.
when we added 7th, randomly we get MASTERs on both server for certain carp
interface. After reboot we
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:01:57AM -0500, Woodchuck wrote:
I. The system call clock_getres(2) and clock_gettime(2) show strange
results.
Consider this small program and its output on OpenBSD 5.0, amd64:
#include stdio.h
#include sys/time.h
main()
{
struct timespec tp;
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:01:57AM -0500, Woodchuck wrote:
I. The system call clock_getres(2) and clock_gettime(2) show strange
results.
Consider this small program and its output on OpenBSD 5.0, amd64:
#include stdio.h
#include sys/time.h
main()
{
struct timespec tp;
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 03:57:10PM +0100, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 15:27 +0100, Leonardo Sabino dos Santos wrote:
Then again, partitioning your disk is a bit more serious than What's
your hostname? or What time zone are you in?. Maybe that one
question deserves an
Op 4 mei 2011 om 17:23 heeft Kapetanakis Giannis bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr
het volgende geschreven:
Hi,
I'd like to ask if it's normal for pfsync bulk transfer to take 5-15
minutes to end for 60k states.
pfsync is on a dedicated gigabit interface on both firewalls.
May 4 17:59:35 fw1
Hi,
for those of you developing software and not reading tech@, you might
find http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=130459895903668w=2
interesting.
-Otto
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:26:04AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:28:48PM -0500, Markus Peloquin wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:20 +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:39:48AM -0500, Vijay Sankar wrote:
man 8 kerberos has the following URL
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 02:54:21PM -0400, Chris Smith wrote:
After an update to -current yesterday Internet access was lost as
pf.conf could not be loaded. The error message was:
pfctl: DIOCADDRULE: Operation not supported by device
This error occurred after upgrading the kernel and then
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:27:59AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
bad advice. zero effect by definition.
maybe the test is flawed by donwloading on the firewall itself?
* Wesley MOUEDINE ASSABY open...@e-solutions.re [2011-05-11 07:47]:
I try this on our firewall (OpenBSD 4.8 -stable)
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:07:43AM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
Hi all,
binary upgrade to latest snapshot - sysmerge - pkg_add -ui (no
updates to packages) and I can't start ff4. Is there something to try
before eg. removing .mozilla or similar?
It this i386?
-Otto
Run without
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 01:09:25PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:07:43AM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
Hi all,
binary upgrade to latest snapshot - sysmerge - pkg_add -ui (no
updates to packages
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 08:30:04AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
Same here, except that only certain pages trigger crash. Plain pages seem to
run just fine.
Is repeatable.
I was assuming that it was a few packages I hadn't yet upgraded due to poor
internet right now.
Glad to see it isn't
To everybody reporting browser misery:
I'm spending more time dragging details out of people than actually
testing.
Please read http://www.openbsd.org/report.html and act accordingly.
We need details, including dmesg and steps to reproduce the problem.
-Otto
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:49:40PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
one page is www.financialarmageddon.com/
There are some others which I can report after I finally get some bad ones
closed out so that xxxterm will stay running.
This page fails for both FF4 and xxxterm, not in Konqueror.
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 03:43:23AM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
(( If you read this far, have a cookie
and wonder with me about that quick extraction...
The system this drive is in has the same board,
but everything else is slower and not idle when meassured...))
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:15:51AM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:08 AM, David Gwynne l...@animata.net wrote:
i have had a look at querying disks for their physical and logical block
alignments and offsets, but the the WD??EARS-00? drives dont report
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:30:22AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:49:40PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
one page is www.financialarmageddon.com/
There are some others which I can report after I finally get some bad ones
closed out so that xxxterm will stay running
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 03:31:03PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:08:18PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Update devel/dconf to the very latest revision.
I tried that first a few days ago and just now (no update).
I just updated FF4 and FF35 and I now get:
whatever
could make your system different from a cleanly installed machine.
Something should cause these program crashes, but all my efforts did
not lead to reprodcution. Only you can possibly discover what's
different on your side.
-Otto
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Otto Moerbeek o
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 07:51:42PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Nicholas Schmidt oneguyn...@gmail.com
wrote:
Likewise here on amd64 -current. No problems on any of the sites outlined
in
this thread
After removing ALL packages and installing them again is
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:00:59PM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
On Sun, 15 May 2011 06:47:54 +0200
Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
-- Urspr. Mitt. --
Betreff: Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot
Von: Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com
Datum: 15.05.2011
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 02:45:01AM +0200, gilbert.fernan...@orange.fr wrote:
Launched a build with apmd -A and then measured
temperatures using a multimeter and a metal rod
temperature sensor.
Yeeloong does not have CPU throttling yet. So the CPU will not run
on a lower clock if there is not
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:22:16PM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
I have great respect for you, Theo, the OpenBSD project, and all of
the contributers. The responses to this situation from Claude have
instilled great confidence in the use of this software. I just want
to point out that the FAQ
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 09:43:42AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:22:16PM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
I have great respect for you, Theo, the OpenBSD project, and all of
the contributers. The responses to this situation from Claude have
instilled great confidence
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:04:35PM +0300, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 02:24:17AM +0200, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
Forwarded Message
From: David Vasek va...@fido.cz
Subject: Re: Lemote Leeyong 8101B pr0n
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 18:34:08 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:23:16AM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:53:58 +0200, LEVAI Daniel l...@ecentrum.hu
wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:42:24 +0300, Michael Sioutis wrote:
Hello!
I can't find it in the man page, and it seems it is not supported (?)
I am
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 06:02:39PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:36:17PM +0200, Erik wrote:
| Op 31-5-2011 17:51, Kevin Chadwick schreef:
|
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/security/working-towards-bug-free-secure-software/5560?tag=nl.e036
|
| Actually they go
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:23:46PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
Not surprisingly, a lot of software that claims to be 64 bits-ready isn't.
This touches all web navigators, most jit engines, and probably lots more
of software (our ports tree version
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 08:58:29PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, 31 May 2011 21:51:40 +0200
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
basically rewriting the memory
management part of the OS in your browser.
Do some browsers do this on OpenBSD?
webkit tries to do this.
-Otto
601 - 700 of 1868 matches
Mail list logo
