Waiting quietly for two months for Eben Moglen's preliminary write-up
(which I was to be sent to "correct") got me no-where. Every seems to
have concluded that the issue is settled since there was no more public
discussion.
All the "other side" said was "nuh-uh" and "you're not a lawyer"
(2) ... (I am not going to go over the legal mistakes you've made,
because of (1))...
I have not made legal mistakes, pompous programmer asshole*.
A gratuitous license, absent an attached interest, is revocable at will.
This goes for GPLv2 as used by linux, just as it goes for the BSD
Why is no one discussing this anymore.
It's like you just accepted the "NU UH U WRONG" proclamation from
programmers.
Are you idiots aware that programmers DO NOT KNOW THE LAW simply by
virtue of being "smarts"?
Are you idiots aware that I am a lawyer, I have studied the law, and I
do
It has been 2 months. Eben Moglen has published no research.
Because there is nothing more to say: The GPLv2, as used by linux, is a
bare license. It can be rescinded at the will of the grantor.
The regime that the FSF used, vis-a-vis the GPLv2, is essential:
copyright transfers to a central
Debian is not ruled by the men who actually write the software, but
instead women.
Just like in all the anglo-american conquered world.
We, the men who actually do work, are treated as the same worker-slaves
everywhere.
Opensource was a refuge from the worthless cunts (who ban us from having
5 matches
Mail list logo
