instead of 19?
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 2:06 PM, Raimo Niskanen
<raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:25:54AM +, Bogdan Andu wrote:
> Hello,
> I have 2 OpenBSD amd64 machines 5.4. and 5.7 which I cannot upgrade them
now
> I want to co
PM, Raimo Niskanen
<raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se> wrote:
...and does not this question belong better at
erlang-questions(at)erlang(dot)org?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:25:54AM +, Bogdan Andu wrote:
> Hello,
> I have 2 OpenBSD amd64 machines 5.4. and 5.7 which I cannot upgr
Hello,
I have 2 OpenBSD amd64 machines 5.4. and 5.7 which I cannot upgrade them now
I want to compile erlang 19 on these machine and the compilation fails:
The compilation process is:1. apply successfully 6.0
ports/lang/erlang/19/patches to the standard tree2. autoreconf-2.693. gmake
.. and the
my 2 cents here...
May be not what u want but have u considered Task::Plack ?
or even better, u can easily modify your Perl scrips to use slowcgi + built-in
httpd demon
if u can make use of OpenBSD machine, otherwise Task::Plack is a wondefull
solution.
I would take this chance to get rid of
+ (UTC)
Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> On 2015-09-30, Bogdan Andu <bo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > If one needs this linux-like crap, sendfile,and cannot disable it,
> > how is he suppose to handle it?
>
> Run it on linux?
>
> I'm surp
Yeah, I realized that after I posted the issue..
On Monday, October 5, 2015 3:29 PM, Sebastian Benoit
<benoit-li...@fb12.de> wrote:
Bogdan Andu(bo...@yahoo.com) on 2015.09.29 14:16:51 +:
> Hi,
>
> I have a piece o software to install that requires
> send
and runs fine on
OpenBSD (amd64/5.7)
So, basically I have a non-sendfile-Yaws tree. Hurray!
Bogdan
On Friday, October 2, 2015 10:38 AM, Stuart Henderson
<s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
On 2015-09-30, Bogdan Andu <bo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> If one needs this linux-like
2015 12:40 PM, Raimo Niskanen
<raimo+open...@erix.ericsson.se> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:19:28AM +, Bogdan Andu wrote:
> Running linux in production is not an option, for me at least.
>
> I was surprised too. They put it recently into deps tree.
>
> Is disabled at ru
If one needs this linux-like crap, sendfile,and cannot disable it, how is he
suppose to handle it?
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:50 PM, Bogdan Andu <bo...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Oh.. s^*%t, only haskell can use it, right?
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:48 PM, Bogda
Hi,
I have a piece o software to install that requires
sendfile functionality .
I installed hs-sendfile from ports, which should providesendfile, but now
sendfile library or binary is present:
I run the command , first:sudo /usr/local/lib/ghc/sendfile-0.7.9/register.sh
and
$ sudo ldconfig
Hi,
I have a piece o software to install that requires
sendfile functionality .
I installed hs-sendfile from ports, which should provide
sendfile, but now sendfile library or binary is present:
I run the command , first:
sudo /usr/local/lib/ghc/sendfile-0.7.9/register.sh
and
$ sudo ldconfig
No,
Erlang. Yaws wants it
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:33 PM, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com>
wrote:
Bogdan Andu wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a piece o software to install that requires
> sendfile functionality .
> I installed hs-sendfile from ports, which shou
Oh.. s^*%t, only haskell can use it, right?
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:48 PM, Bogdan Andu <bo...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
No,
Erlang. Yaws wants it
On Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:33 PM, Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com>
wrote:
Bogdan Andu wrote:
&g
Hi,
I need to set-up a forward proxy using relayd with ssl.
My /etc/relayd.conf:
prefork 1
http protocol httpfilter {
       return error
       pass
       match label Prohibited!
       block url social.network.example.com/
       # New configuration
Hi,
I need to set-up a forward proxy using relayd with ssl.
My /etc/relayd.conf:
prefork 1
http protocol httpfilter {
       return error
       pass
       match label Prohibited!
       block url social.network.example.com/
       # New configuration
Hi,
First, apologies for this question.
I would like to put in production an OpenBSD server but I have no time to wait
until May 1stso I have to either use 5.6 -stable or to follow -current.
My question is:
I would like to install 5.7 -current from freeze point which becomes 5.7
-release,but
in Perl. |
| |
| View on www.fastcgi.com | Preview by Yahoo |
| |
| Â |
Â
On Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:36 PM, Stuart Henderson
s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014-11-13, Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Are Perl scripts in FastCGI evaluated in same manner like in mod_perl
thoughts,
Bogdan
On Thursday, November 6, 2014 6:48 PM, li...@ggp2.com li...@ggp2.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:24:24AM +, Bogdan Andu wrote:
4) will httpd be able to support Perl script processing without the need to
talk to an external (FasCGI) daemon?
Just my 2c about the new
Hi,
There are some confusing info about which won the base-webserver in OpenBSD:
In 5.6 it seems to be nginx 1.6.0 (http://www.openbsd.org/plus56.html) :
Unhooked httpd(8) from build: use of nginx(8) is encouraged now.
Removed Apache from base (replaced by nginx(8)).Â
and
In current
Hello list,
the bug in bash shell discovered last day also seems to be present in ksh and
csh. ksh is known to be the default shell in OpenBSD.
the following piece of shell code executes succesffuly on both ksh and csh
(besides bash of course):
ksh:
$ env VAR='() { :;}; echo Bash is
From: Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
Cc: Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org; misc@openbsd.org
misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: relayd
crash
You can't debug relayd without attaching to all
.
(gdb)
The program is not being run.
(gdb)
The
program is not being run.
(gdb)
The program is not being run.
(gdb)
But
the daemon relayd crashed.
Bogdan
From:
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
Cc:
misc@openbsd.org misc
Hello,
I'm experiencing a strange behavior of relayd.
relayd is used for
reverse-proxy an Apache[localhost] web server instance and ssl acceleration.
relayd engine crashes with the following errors:
$ cat /var/log/daemon
Aug 21 04:41:47 www-apps-int relayd[1592]: pfe exiting, pid 1592
Aug
From: Alexey E. Suslikov alexey.susli...@gmail.com
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: relayd crash
Bogdan Andu bog09 at yahoo.com writes:
machine is OpenBSD 5.3/amd64 GENERIC.MP
relayd on 5.3 is buggy. you either
From: Peter Hessler
phess...@theapt.org
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
Cc: Alexey E.
Suslikov alexey.susli...@gmail.com; misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: relayd crash
On 2013
Aug 21 (Wed) at 02:16:32 -0700
:
relayd crash
On 2013-08-21, Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com wrote:
I tried
relayd -current and crashed with the error:
pwd:
/usr/src/usr.sbin/relayd
$ sudo ./relayd -f /etc/relayd.conf -d
. A LOT
OF LOGS
relay www_ssl, session 1368 (1 active), 0,
64.39.111.90
- :0, SSL
yes.
we waiting for tests to finish - I launched 3 concurrent tests.
tomorrow I'll give you the results.
From: Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
Cc: misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013
6:06 PM
?
From: Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 1:19 AM
Subject: Re:
MariaDB and OpenBSD
On 2013-06-28, Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
I have installed mariadb-server-5.5.31p0 and
mariadb-client-5.5.31p0
on an OpenBSD
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com; Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com;
misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: MariaDB and OpenBSD
You are trying to use a -current ports
tree on 5.3 which is not supported and you can have various problems as a
result of this.
Also
of
that
assembler code.
Having these in mind what is the roadmap of integrating
mariadb in OpenBSD?
Bogdan
From: Stuart
Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com; Bogdan Andu
bo...@yahoo.com; misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org
Sent
Hello,
I have installed mariadb-server-5.5.31p0 and mariadb-client-5.5.31p0
on an OpenBSD 5.3 amd64 machine.
I have also re-installed from ports
p5-DBD-mysql with version 1.36 of Makefile, which supports mariadb.
p5-DBD-mysql via pkg_add gives me this error:
sudo pkg_add
...@openbsd.org
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: MariaDB
and OpenBSD
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:49:09AM -0700, Bogdan Andu wrote:
Hello,
I have installed mariadb-server-5.5.31p0 and
mariadb-client-5.5.31p0
From: Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
Cc: misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 12:04 AM
Subject: Re: __guard_local issue
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com wrote:
./configure
libraries but I do not know what they are.
How can I dicover these libraries that I should link erlang against?
Bogdan
From: Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
Cc: misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 9:04 AM
Hello,
I compile from source Erlang R14B04 on a freshly installed OpenBSD 5.3 amd64
machine, configured with preinstalled opensssl library /usr/lib/libssl.so.19.0 .
$ /usr/sbin/openssl
OpenSSL version
OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012
OpenSSL
^D
when I try to load the crypto module I get the
Hello,
I have two machines in production, M1 and M2.
M1 : OpenBSD M1 5.1
GENERIC.MP#207 amd64
M2 : OpenBSD M2 5.2 GENERIC.MP#368 amd64
Both machines
have relayd as reversed proxy and ssl acceleration
for a default install
Apache 1.3 non-chroot running on localhost.
On both machines the
Hello,
I have an OpenBSD box running default apache server that its sole
task is to present data, nothing more, nothing less.
The logic of the
applications is handled by an app. layer that never exceeds 40 Mbytes RAM and
handles concurently all the connections (tcp based) from apache children
the most
likely place for this is in the perl scripts you're
running.
http://modperlbook.org/html/14-2-6-Memory-Leakage.html has some
suggestions
for tracking these down.
There is also maxrequestsperchild which might hide
(but not fix)
the problem.
On 2013-04-05, Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
wrote
Hello,
A few questions related to openbsd and vmware.
What are the best practices to run OpenBSD in vmware?
Are there any known problems one should take into consideration before
virtualization?
I already have a functional machine runnig OpenBSD 5.2 /amd64 on bare metal.
It is possible to
)
Nov 20 13:06:34 fw02 relayd[20956]: relay wwwssl, session 191 (1 active), 0,
***.***.127.152 - 192.168.21.218:443, invalid (500 Internal Server Error)
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Andrew Klettke
Systems Admin
Optic Fusion
On 11/15/2012 04:04 AM, Bogdan Andu wrote:
Hello,
I looked
is working.
Bogdan
From: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
To:
Sebastian Benoit be...@openbsd.org; misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org
Cc: r...@openbsd.org r...@openbsd.org
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012
9:36 AM
Subject: Re: relayd and header directives
Hello
) swap on sd0b dump on
sd0b
From: Sebastian Benoit
be...@openbsd.org
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
Cc: r...@openbsd.org
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 12:47 AM
Subject: Re: relayd and header
directives
Hi,
in a quick test i could not reproduce your problem
Hello,
I have the follwing setup on a single machine:
RELAYD[PUBLIC IP]:443
- WEB_SERVER[127.0.0.1]:8080
pf is disbaled for testing purposes
relayd is
configured like this (snip):
/etc/relayd.conf:
###
table webhosts { 127.0.0.1}
http protocol
www_ssl_prot {
#
IP
to be seen by my daemon.
Please somebody give me an advice of how can this
become possible.
At least somebody tell me if this is posible at all, and if
yes how this can be achieved with relayd.
With many thanks in advanced,
Bogdan
From: Bogdan Andu
bo
Hi Brett,
Thank you for your suggestions.
I sent the previous message - a
reply to my own message - to misc@ mailing list also
Bogdan
From: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
To:
t...@openbsd.org t...@openbsd.org
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 12:40 PM
Subject
Hello,
I am trying to solve a problem and I am really out of ideas.
I want
to use relayd to setup a transparent reversed proxy with ssl offloading for a
local daemon.
The data flow is the follwing:
Client --| $ext_if
relayd box lo0 (local daemon) |
It is possible for local
From: Stuart Henderson
s...@spacehopper.org
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2012 3:27
PM
Subject: Re: relayd log file
On 2012-08-14, Remco
re...@d-compu.dyndns.org wrote:
2) this may be more to your liking, add
the following to /etc/syslog.conf:
From: Remco re...@d-compu.dyndns.org
To: Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com; misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 14,
2012 9:07 AM
Subject: Re: relayd log file
Bogdan Andu wrote:
Hello,
I have a reverse proxy based on relayd. however I am unable to see who
Hello,
I have a reverse proxy based on relayd. however I am unable to see who accesses
the server.
general directive 'log all' writes the client_ip - actual_web_server_ip in
file /var/log/daemon which is enough but that file rotates to quickly and I do
not want to change its default setup.
Hello,
I have a service listening both on inet and inet6 sockets, so I have inet6
traffic going in to that service
Because I have trunk0 setup, a rule like:
(3) pass in inet6 proto tcp to port $service_port queue services
does not solves the problem, because only few packets and sometimes
Thank you very much for explanations.
It works very good.
Thank you,
Bogdan
From: Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 6:08 PM
Subject: Re:
trunk0 with dual stack
On 2012-05-16, Bogdan Andu bo...@yahoo.com
Hello,
It is possible to build an interface aggregation on dual stack
systems?
I want my trunk0 interface to be bound to ipv4 and to ipv6 address
and I don't know:
1. If this is possible, and
2. if it si possible how do I
make the setup permanent?
Currently the trunk0 interface works with IPv4
52 matches
Mail list logo
