Hi,
I've configured the ices package to stream whatever happens to be flowing into
my sound card line input using this roundabout method (seems to work the best
given that ices will read from a FIFO but not stdin):
1. aucat writes line in to FIFO at /dev/aucat/.raw;
2. lame reads from
jul wrote:
Hello
has someone setup a vpn tunnel between openbsd and an iphone ?
it seems ipsec part is strictly limited to cisco ipsec with a user
account/password so not good for us.
Else there is pptp and l2tp but i'm not sure there is anything in base
to do this.
Ports seems to only have
Obviously someone made a mistake running that story, as April 1st is
still over half a year away.
Breeno
mak maxie wrote:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080rid=-219
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
gm_sjo wrote:
2008/10/10 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wow. Good luck. Can't you see we've been down that road before with
those bastards? But really. Good luck. You really are too optimistic,
but sure, learn the reality for yourself.
I'm sure calling vendors 'bastards' on a
gm_sjo wrote:
2008/10/10 Breen Ouellette [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When you have proven yourself even 10% as helpful to the cause of OpenBSD as
Theo is, then maybe, just maybe, you are justified in criticizing his
tactics. I look forward to that point in time, but until then I really have
no reason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I don't know if it's known but there's a online petition for VIA.
Hopefully some people sign up and name also OpenBSD (in the
optional-section).
It's about VIAs policy with docs/drivers and the lies they spread (about
supporting Opensouce).
Link:
Deanna Phillips wrote:
Marco Peereboom writes:
Blah blah blah my feelers are hurt. Do I need to mail you
some maxi pads?
Do I need to point out that you've attempted to insult someone
by comparing him to some bullshit stereotype about women?
Well said. Flinging mud is all well
Marco,
I can definitely see another angle:
RMS spoke about OpenSolaris without getting his facts straight. When his
bullshit was exposed he backtracked and had the author of the article
post this correction:
[RMS added this comment later:] Since that interview I've learned that
not all of
Marc Balmer wrote:
Richard Stallman wrote:
I doubt someone who is truly unfriendly could organize a
hackathon, a friendly social event.
He may be perfectly friendly to others. What is relevant is that he
tends to be unfriendly to me.
What is relevant is that you are a hypocrite
-
This is a reply to David's email to me. I have left out his original
message since it was sent privately and without permission to repost to
the list.
-
This is all I have left to say on the matter. How you take it from here
is up to you.
OpenBSD only endorses OpenBSD. I have
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:54:47AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Richard, your pants are full of hypocritical poo.
You too.
I still remember cheering when I read
http://monkey.org/openbsd/archive/ports/0108/msg00460.html
* From: Theo de Raadt [EMAIL
OpenBSD developers,
In recognition of all the bullshit flying around recently on misc@, I
would like to offer to mail my copy of of the essay /On Bullshit/ by
Harry Frankfurt as a gift to the first OpenBSD developer to request it.
This essay is bound in a blue hardcover 4 x 6 (10cm x 15cm)
It's yours Bob. Given the address you've posted, I imagine that you
might want me to send it in care of someone with the initials RMS?
Breeno
Bob Beck wrote:
Me! Me! Ship it to my address:
51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor
Boston, MA 02110-1301
USA
-Bob
* Breen Ouellette [EMAIL
Benjamin M. A'Lee wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 08:06:35PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
That's bullshit. Read it again. The BSD license gives the recipient
some abilities, but retains others. One of those is that the source
code must retain the license. Other restrictions... why do we
David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Hell, the OpenBSD ports tree should perhaps contain patches which
REMOVE such commercial operating system support. That's a fork
Richard would surely approve of.
Richard, your pants are full of hypocritical poo.
I have no doubt
ropers wrote:
This site uses ABLOBE Flush*, but it's TEH FUNNAY:
http://googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GBword1=OpenBSDword2=Richard+Stallman
*) But it's also lynx(1) compatible: Follow the IFRAME: content link
to see the gist of things. In the Flush version there's also a winning
stick
With the release of 4.2 I thought I would check again to see if the
vpn1411 still fails with 'Corrupted MAC on input' on a Soekris net4801.
I am happy to say that I can no longer reproduce the error using the
GENERIC kernel.
In the past I could pop up the error within minutes using this
Marco Peereboom wrote:
I installed FreeBSD once in my life. Took me 3 tries and I am sure some
kittens were murdered in the process. I am also pretty sure I wept at
some point. Honestly I can't remember a much worse installer; maybe SCO
OpenServer but not by much.
I second that! If FreeBSD
I do not have experience with the net5501, but as for the vpn1411, you
may want to check out this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=117826557508813w=2
It talks about recompiling the GENERIC kernel minus a few options, which
has the side effect of fixing SSH connection problems with
Theo de Raadt wrote:
On 6/13/07, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I have been reading a thread on opensolaris.org regarding the
open-sourcing of 4front's OSS. After explaining why CDDL licensing is
unsuitable for OpenBSD, some of the developers have expressed an
interest to
Theo de Raadt wrote:
The c2k7 hackathon is over, with roughly 50 developers attending the
event for 10 days in Calgary.
So many projects were started or finished, it is basically impossible
for me to describe all the projects.
Hope you guys out there enjoy the changes that we've made.
Luca Losio wrote:
Thank you. The goal is to have the mini replace my dying sparc64
as a web server. Small, low power draw, quiet: I like that.
Quite expensive also
When you compare its price/performance versus something like a Soekris,
it looks pretty good and is still a reasonably
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Breen Ouellette wrote:
I honestly do not know as I do not have access to the size of the
user base
nor the financial needs of the project. If 5000 users gave $100 per year to
the project that would be half a million dollars. Are there 5000 users
Tobias Weingartner wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Breen Ouellette wrote:
I feel that if the user base can meet the financial needs of the project
then the user base is doing its part. Unfortunately, I know of several
people who use OpenBSD that will never send in a flat penny
Eliah Kagan wrote:
That would still be most OpenBSD users, wouldn't it?
I honestly do not know as I do not have access to the size of the user
base nor the financial needs of the project. If 5000 users gave $100 per
year to the project that would be half a million dollars. Are there 5000
Eliah Kagan wrote:
On 10/28/06, Breen Ouellette wrote:
The shame enters the picture when you place expectations for additional
output from the people giving freely. I see people griping all the time
for this or that feature, or support for this or that hardware. I see
this from people who
Johan P. Lindstrvm wrote:
Shame on everyone who dont buy their CD's. Try it out from a local FTP
and when the time comes, twice a year so far, get your release on CD,
plenty of nice stickers and the artwork is always amazing.
I never buy the CDs because I don't have a use for them. I agree
Han Boetes wrote:
Heey Theo,
Why don't you tell _him_ to shut up?
I'm going to go out on a limb here...
I think Theo has better things to do than spend all day telling people
to shut up on [EMAIL PROTECTED] He reserves it for only the most special of posts.
Of course, I could be wrong and
Miod Vallat wrote:
For historical reference, info taken from bsdstats.org:
[...]
What is the point discussing completely bogus so-called statistics?
At best, I would suggest that some are proud to be OpenBSD users.
At worst, I would say that being an OpenBSD user gives some people an
Clint M. Sand wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 12:04:45AM -0600, Breen Ouellette wrote:
The reality is probably somewhere in the middle, but it is no different
than cheering for a sports team. Whether or not the stats are accurate,
some people seem to feel a need to cheer on the work
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Why do some people feel the need to make up utter bullshit defences
for the vendors, when there is not one ounce of fact to back it up?
Why?
I think that might be my fault. When I ASKED earlier this month if it
was a possible excuse, it might have been picked up and run
From: Daniel Hartmeier (danielbenzedrine.cx)
Date: Wed Dec 12 2001 - 08:31:08 CST
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:08:37PM +0100, Nicolas Prochazka wrote:
With OpenBSD 2.9 and ipf , our internet connexion was down due to a
ip state
overflow. (the default IPSTATE_SIZE was near 4000) and we
Theo de Raadt wrote:
But Craig, it's the same with women. They'll only hang out with you
if they feel there is enough positive vibe in you. And since you so
clearly show that you are a pessimist at heart, you're out of luck
too!
If you keep saying something good won't happen -- well then you
Shane J Pearson wrote:
You find a lot of things obvious for a guy who is so presumptuous.
For the record, I respect the intentions of RMS and I highly respect
the intentions and practical thinking of Theo, the OpenBSD project,
the developers and much of the user base. I've been enjoying
I just spotted this in the news:
http://news.com.com/Transmeta+sues+Intel+for+patent+infringement/2100-1006_3-6124965.html?tag=nefd.top
If Intel makes a habit of stealing patented technology would open access
to their hardware documentation then make it easier for the patent
holder to sue?
Jack J. Woehr wrote:
On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Shane J Pearson wrote:
By interesting, you mean one is well meaning, but a little kooky
and not always in touch with reality and the other is focused and
committed to maintaining some sanity in the world of computing?
No, I didn't
Han Boetes wrote:
You lie.
You insult.
You threaten.
I'd love to meet _you_ in person too.
Well I have met him (Theo) in person several times, and I think he's a
pretty stand up guy. I've never known him to lie, but insults and
threats usually flow freely when he feels the behaviour of
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
a) Intel doesn't own the technology, but licensed it from another
vendor. The licensing terms don't allow Intel to release full
details.
b) Intel has agreements with other customers/vendors to not release
information about a particular piece of
Theo de Raadt wrote:
As far as I am concerned, yes we can email and complain, but they are so
arrogant that nothing will change.
Arrogant people change when their arrogance is too publically displayed.
Not only that, but arrogant people leave their jobs and sometimes the
replacements
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Majid Awad at Intel has stated to developers that he is the current
person who is responsible for this particular area. So go ahead, let
him know how you feel about this.
Again, his email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So let's win back the rights to run the hardware we
. Should Intel correct this behaviour in
the future, I will be sure to change my stance towards the company and
make all of my contacts aware of the situation.
Hopefully Intel will be able to come to a decision which will benefit
both Intel and the open source community.
Sincerely,
Breen Ouellette
Whyzzi wrote:
On 31/08/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what my point is, though, is if we aren't willing to
accept 'vendor written drivers', then it is *we* that are limiting our
growth but limiting what hardware we can run stably on ...
Sadly, you've twisted the point in the
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
My OpenBSD 3.9 on an amd64 is very very slow for SSH login.
As already mentioned, if reverse lookup doesn't work your login will
pause for a substantial amount of time before you are prompted.
Assuming this is a network under your control, if your LAN is small you
Nick Holland wrote:
The thing could still be a frustrating first OpenBSD system for
someone. It's a great machine for what it is...but not as a Welcome
to OpenBSD system. My overall recommendation stands. Get used to
OpenBSD on familiar hardware, then get used to unusual hardware with
an
to misc@openbsd.org is relevant. Thanks in
advance for your consideration.
Breen Ouellette
Peter Philipp wrote:
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 09:45:19AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
(I tried to shut up and not continue this thread but you've sucked me
in...)
Well I tried to shut up too, but Travers sucked me in, who was sucked
in by another guy who was uhm.. 3
J.C. Roberts wrote:
This should take care of any of the long standing issues OpenBSD has had
with the HiFn's procedures for releasing documentation.
This is good news. Thanks for your contribution!
To all the nay-sayers out there: this proves that sometimes companies do
'get' their
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I will ask this honestly:
Why should we bleed our little hearts over a company who acted like
assholes towards us for years, and only changed their policy due to
public pressure?
To make ourselves feel better? I think it is pointless. They still
did not apologize.
I
Theo de Raadt wrote:
So they gave us docs. Now we need to say they are nice?
No way. They have received money from hundreds of you. You are
customers. They are a company. Now if you (like them) cannot figure
out what that means, that they have a RESPONSIBILITY to their
customers, and that
Siju George wrote:
I 've been told by people ( more than one ) off list how *uncivilized*
it is to forward *private* mail publicly *even when it has some bad
content*.
I wouldn't sweat it too much. It would be one thing to bait him by first
promising not to go public with his mail and _later_
Marc Balmer wrote:
* Han Boetes wrote:
I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
this is about the most idiotic wast of time I ever heard of. what is
Darrin Chandler wrote:
Look, it's pretty obvious from early exchanges in this thread that these
issues have been discussed by the principal parties over a fairly long
period of time. How many brilliant insights have been added by this
thread? More important, has this thread opened up Hifn's
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
I guess the part I don't understand is why are open source folks so
wary of running black-box *.o binaries from a vendor but are quite
eager to use blackbox crypto cards (that effectively run blackbox *.o
firmware)?
This is a pretty poor argument in my books.
knitti wrote:
oh come on, this discussion is already as off topic as it can be, no need
to add FUD to it. any algorithm the cards claim to implement _is_ fully
documented, so you can test any output except that of the RNG against a
'known good' implementation
This is a great point. However...
Breen Ouellette wrote:
I am still going to install 3.9 on a PC and try an ssh connection
which doesn't involve WinXP / PuTTY.
I finally got around to it and I still get the error when connecting
from a PC installed with OpenBSD 3.9 to my net4801 / vpn1411 running
OpenBSD 3.9. So, just
Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
Lawrence Horvath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu 15.Jun'06 at 13:27:54 -0700
Can i rate limit both ways, incomming and outgoing, the pf
documentation for queues sd only one way, but is there a way to keep
the system from downloading as much to it? so as to keep
Siju George wrote:
This is the mail I got from Hifn representative for my response to his
mail and clarifications in misc.
...
Hank Cohen
On my own account.
Well, hopefully this will encourage Mr. Cohen to think hard about a
situation before he wallows in and posts something to a public
L. V. Lammert wrote:
BS aside, it's obvious you don't deal in US markets! While the
implementation may be flawed, dealing with export regulations, silly as
that may seem to non US organizations, CAN be business threatening. Not to
be taken lightly.
This issue has nothing to do with export
to make this into a positive situation for Hifn and
OpenBSD.
Breen Ouellette
Dag Richards wrote:
Marc Balmer wrote:
I live in Switzerland. Do I give a fuckin' rats ass for US Export
Regulations?
Not care about US Export Regs?
But that just means you want the terrorists to win.
After all our President is your President right?
I think nearly everyone here is
Hello.
Given the recent post by Theo about the poor state of Hifn cooperation,
I am curious to know how OpenBSD developers rate the other companies
producing cryptography accelerators. The Cryptography page
(http://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html) seems to be somewhat outdated,
stating 'Hifn was
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/06/06 13:11, Sam Chill wrote:
There is a very handy program called memtest86 which can test your
memory to see if it is bad.
It tells you if it's bad, but it doesn't tell you if it's good.
Of course not. It doesn't even tell you if your memory is
Shane J Pearson wrote:
I have a faulty DDR2 SODIMM in my laptop which memtest86 shows to fail
in the same place every single time. This machine has 2 SODIMMS. If I
swap their positions in the memory slots in my laptop, memtest86 shows
the errors follow the module to the other slot, while
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I thought my mail was clear enough.
Not necessarily. This thread was originally about the Hifn 7956 whereas
my interest is in the 7955. You stated that about a year ago Hifn
policies changed and that they decided they would no longer provide
documentation. I know the
Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
The eventual plan is to get dom0 support in OpenBSD; we'll see how
long it takes.
Out of curiousity, do you know how the GPL licence of Xen affects dom0
support in OpenBSD?
Breeno
Theo de Raadt wrote:
So it does not really matter if you give further debugging
information. There is some bug, and we don't know what it is, and I
wish it was fixed because in some way we find it embarrassing to have
something not work in OpenBSD, but hey, what can we really do?
Theo,
Darrin Chandler wrote:
Ask Gates, Ballmer and crew what MS's goals are. Or find it on the MS
site. If none of that works you can speculate (I'm not going to). Do you
think their goals fall as much in line with what you want as does
OpenBSD's goals?
Actually, this is very easy and does not
Didier Wiroth wrote:
Hello,
Hmm I get the corrupted mac error again on current, while connecting to
the net4801 with windows + putty.
Connecting with openbsd ssh client does not produce the error, I only get it
with latest
windows and putty client
Is anyone else able to test:
a)
Didier Wiroth wrote:
Sorry ;-) I've reposted a new message a few minutes later ...
May I ask you a question, do you use a custom kernel on your soekris box?
- Original Message -
From: Breen Ouellette
Date: Thursday, June 1, 2006 22:43
Subject: Re: vpn1411 problem related to software
Didier Wiroth wrote:
I run the test for almost 20 minutes, there was no problem anymore!
Regards
Didier
Thank you for your report.
Here's where I stick my head out farther than I probably should and hope
it doesn't get taken off.
I checked the hifn code to see if it had changed since 3.9
jared r r spiegel wrote:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:01:21PM -0600, Breen Ouellette wrote:
A few months ago, Didier Wiroth posted to this list that his net4801 with
a vpn1411 was giving him 'Corrupted MAC on input' errors. He was looking
for a solution to this problem.
i think i
Peter Strvmberg wrote:
I have a net4801 with a vpn1411 and I occasionally got the error
(but not for a good while now).
I also have a vpn1411 in a generic i386 mb and I *never* seen the error on that
machine.
Peter,
Could you provide a model number for your generic i386 mainboard? Is it
Didier Wiroth wrote:
Hello,
I had the same problem and symtoms as you.
net4801 + 1411 vpn + corrupted mac on input.
I've upgraded to a current build a few minutes ago, I did not get any errors
anymore.
So, just to verify, as of -current you can no longer cause the error by
running the
Peter Strvmberg wrote:
Eh, sorry, it was a 1401 in my soekris :-)
The soekris has a ral(4) minipci and a vpn1401 pci
The i386 is a Intel L440GX+ with a vpn1401 and a sk(4) (Linksys EG1064)
Both are running -currentish, updated about once or twice a month
That is actually interesting. If you
Stoyan Genov wrote:
I seem to no-longer be able to find what I once found in google
search results, so take this with a grain of salt, but if my memory
serves me correctly, there exists a series of net4801 boards with a
problematic capacitor somewhere in the PCI bus circuitry which could be
Hello.
I recently posted this message on the Soekris tech list, but given the
sparse amount of traffic there I am hoping that misc@ will prove to be a
better source of the test data required to keep this problem moving
toward a positive conclusion, rather than stalling as has happened as
76 matches
Mail list logo