- Original Message -
From: Jean-FranC'ois SIMON
Sent: 09/08/10 08:50 PM
To: openbsd-misc
Subject: preserving editor files
Hi All,
At start-up the OS stays several minutes on preserving editor files.
Could you please inform me what to do about this what is the system
Can we ask in the future something similar at src/*/shlib_version major
bumps?
to avoid ``pkg_add -u'' complaining about bad
major/minor I do the following:
- check that my mirror is up to date
ie ``ls'' to make sure all files belong
to the same snap
you mean: all
Thank you for the polite answers.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Charles Smith chasm_...@gmx.com wrote:
Can we ask in the future something similar at src/*/shlib_version major
bumps?
Can we ask in the present that you actually describe what problem you're
trying to solve when you suggest
Or maybe just send a heads up mail to m...@.
Nowadays I'm using snapshots, but it can be current also, it is imo unimportant
within aspect.
Sometimes, seldom, I see on sources-changes@ major bumps.
I mark the precise date, when the major bump happened.
At the next upgrade i pay big attention that my base system must correspond
with
- Original Message -
From: Vadim Zhukov
2010/5/28 Charles Smith chasm_...@gmx.com:
Or maybe just send a heads up mail to m...@.
You do not need to bother about ABI changes if you're using -STABLE(thanks to
developers). And if you're using -CURRENT, you'redefinitely advised
Can we ask in the future something similar at src/*/shlib_version major bumps?
Index: current.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/current.html,v
retrieving revision 1.221
diff -u -r1.221 current.html
--- current.html 27 May 2010
Good afternoon!
When there is a major bump in src/.../shlib_version files,
snapshots sets must be correspond with snapshots packages.
For example:
src/lib/libkrb5/shlib_version
src/gnu/lib/libiberty/shlib_version
src/lib/libc/shlib_version
src/lib/libm/shlib_version
Maybe with minor bump too?
Index: src/etc/root/root.mail
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/root/root.mail,v
retrieving revision 1.87
diff -u -r1.87 root.mail
--- src/etc/root/root.mail 24 Jun 2009 06:46:07 - 1.87
+++ src/etc/root/root.mail 30 Sep
--- On Wed, 9/30/09, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
It's too late for this.
Yes, I have realised this too after sending. Sorry for the noise.
to create a web section listing the reasonable and bastard vendors?
I think it would be useful in two points:
* helps to OpenBSD community to choose the right hardware
* make good or bad publicity depending on real vendor's position
Anyway it's only an idea.
+1
I very like the idea.
--- On Sat, 7/12/08, Charles Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Charles Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: neomagic and the needs-update entries
To: misc@openbsd.org
Date: Saturday, July 12, 2008, 6:09 PM
Good afternoon!
In xenocara/MODULES file a needs-update entry,
eg by neomagic,
can
Good afternoon!
In xenocara/MODULES file a needs-update entry, eg by neomagic,
can provoke errors, like PR pending/5836 [0]?
The PR in short:
On i386 ThinkPad 600X (NeoMagic 256ZX NM2360) doesn't work
WindowMaker since 2008.04.10 (or before too, that was my first test
after 4.3 RELEASE
Good afternoon!
So, before the next make build I must rebuild the yacc alone.
I would like to know how can I rebuild yacc.
I searched in old errata patches, Makefiles, bsd.*.mk files.
In my previous logfile (2008.07.07/src_make_build) I see, that by
yacc the make cleandir is used:
rm -f yacc.cat1
14 matches
Mail list logo