On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Josh Grosse j...@jggimi.homeip.net wrote:
On 2014-08-15 10:39, Scott Bonds wrote:
...I'm running owncloud and a bunch of other (no doubt less secure)
software
On June 29, there was a 5.5-stable update to www/owncloud to release 6.0.4
to fix a security
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Wong Peter peterap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
*Routing Table* (route show | more)
Destination Gateway Flags Interface
default 175.13.8.127.254 UGS tun0
175.130.127.254 175.135.116.213 (PPPOE IP address) UH tun0
should'n be your default gateway your external
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Zé Loff zel...@zeloff.org wrote:
Are you forwarding packets between interfaces?
$ sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding
modem is responding (to internal LAN, I suppose), so it must enabled,
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
2010/12/20 lilit-aibolit lilit-aibo...@mail.ru:
I have a little problem with route show command.
netstat -nr
after I type this command and press Enter on first machine - all is done:
But if I do it on second machine, output in console and terminal is
very-very slow,
try `netstat -nr',
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Philippe NICOLAS
pi...@maelyx.pilax.com wrote:
Anyway is it possible for smtpd to log the IP of the remote server in the
maillog as sendmail did it ?
I was asking for the same thing.
It's not useful, it's fundamental for any mail server admin. to know:
who got
} - serverftp
port ftp
man ftp-proxy
--
Cristiano Deana - FreeCRIS
Ho iniziato a usare FreeBSD perche' m$ usava me. ed e' spiacevole
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:23 AM, M. Feenstraopen...@itmon.nl wrote:
Does something like this exist? Or maybe, is there a better way of
dealing with this?
http://ossec.net/
it's EXACTLY what you want.
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
On 6/29/09 9:58 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
http://ossec.net/
it's EXACTLY what you want.
They don't say they do pf on their webpage.
Yes, it does.
A default installation use a standard firewall_up on server side, in
while in the client it use pf, or iptable or whatever O.S. is supporting.
, 192.168.21.2 and with a table.
Nothing change in nat rules.
--
Cristiano Deana - FreeCRIS
Ho iniziato a usare FreeBSD perche' m$ usava me. ed e' spiacevole
Hi,
i think this is a pf's bug:
short description:
internal interface with two different ip's in two different lans:
192.168.20.254/24
192.168.21.254/24
They're used as gateway from the two lans.
nat rules: every 10 ip's use a different public ip.
everithing works fine for the first lan, with
: 2249 ]
Second LAN:
@26 nat on bnx0 inet from 192.168.21.11 - 192.168.21.20 to any -
xxx.yyy.zzz.27
[ Evaluations: 20Packets: 0 Bytes: 0
States: 0 ]
[ Inserted: uid 0 pid 12206 State Creations: 0 ]
--
Cristiano Deana - FreeCRIS
Ho iniziato a usare FreeBSD perche
Scenario:
int_if with two ip addresses in two differents lans (192.168.20.254,
192.168.21.254).
more aliases in the external interfaces
nat rules: every 10 internals ip use an external address for the nat.
everything works fine, except for the second internal ip address. ip
from
Scenario:
int_if with two ip addresses in two differents lans (192.168.20.254,
192.168.21.254).
more aliases in the external interfaces
nat rules: every 10 internals ip use an external address for the nat.
everything works fine, except for the second internal ip address. ip
from
2009/2/25 Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com:
man netstat(1) and look what the flags mean.
UGHD, up, gateway, host, dynamic. This route got created because of an
ICMP control packet or TCP PMTU and is normaly only valid for a certain
time.
Thanks, Claudio.
I knew it was DYNAMIC, i didn't
Hi,
i have a proxy server (4.4 amd64 + squid) with foreign ip addresses in
routing table.
example:
# uname -a
OpenBSD proxy.cs.intra 4.4 GENERIC#1021 i386
# netstat -nr -f inet
Routing tables
Internet:
DestinationGatewayFlags Refs Use Mtu Prio Iface
default
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to upgrade from 4.3 to 4.4 using bsd.rd.
I read the upgrade FAQ and came across this variable
${RELEASEPATH}
What does this mean?
It's well commented in the faq:
export RELEASEPATH=/usr/rel # where you put the
On Nov 21, 2007 10:48 AM, Kafriki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok here is a user with full details: (this is in plain text, hope it's more
readable)
cat.cat:$2a$07$aYgatzjxAULHQmmZkjmvteGEaO8Ie8geMoUfhl7AAzKi.WeRhuoA6:10006:20::0:0:Pussy
Cat:/smbhome/student_homedirs/cat.cat:/bin/ksh
Don't
On Nov 15, 2007 7:06 PM, Piet Slaghekke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while: Expression Syntax.
are you using ksh shell?
if not:
# ksh
# while read uid; do userdel $uid; done userlist.txt
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
2007/10/16, Bibby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Where/How can i set the max client number of OpenSSH?
I don't know, but you can do it using pf.
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
2007/7/2, Steve B [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm the one who started this thread. If I can block them for an hour without
a table that would be even better.. I was using the file to store the IP's
as they were identified by the rule and had been planning to use the
expiretable package to start
2007/7/2, Alden Pierre [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You probably didn't export PKG_PATH into your environment:
Here is all of my exported variables from my .profile. env | grep
PKG_PATH comes back with the ftp site I have set
in my .profile.
2007/4/2, carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Somebody have test it this Dell server under OpenBSD 4.0? this server use SAS
or SATA disk with PERC 5/i controller, are they supported under OpenBSD 4.0?
yes. supported with mfi(4) driver, manageable by bioctl(8) utility
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Hi,
i have a openbsd 4 box with squid-transparent.
it seems like it have poors performance. investigating with `top' i
saw squid using only 90M of ram, why?
How can i use better my box resource? (Xeon CPU with 4GB of ram)
top:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATEWAIT TIMECPU
2007/1/30, John Brahy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have net.ip.forwarding=1 and my pf.conf is completely empty right
now. From the 10.1.1.100 client, I can't ping the internet from
10.1.11.100, but I can from my firewall. Is there anything special I
have to do to route private networks? Here's the ipv4
Hi all,
i can't find any reference about max memory in openbsd, only some
questions about it (from me and others).
i tried with 4.0 i386 and amd64 and it seems i have no luck to see all
my memory (4G).
i also tried the patch who someone post the link but it doesn't work.
so, just two question:
2006/12/23, Clint Pachl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
i tried with 4.0 i386 and amd64 and it seems i have no luck to see all
my memory (4G).
From http://www.openbsd.org/plus40.html
Implemented separate pmap for PAE i386 machines, allows for support for
machines with more than 4G RAM. Not enabled
2006/12/19, C. L. Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
pfctl -vvsr
verbose, verbose, show, rules. Refer to pfctl(8).
saruman:~# pfctl -wsr
NOT wsr but vvsr (v v s r)
Refer to pfctl(8).
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
Hi,
i have a system (dell 1950) with 4GB ram. OpenBSD (amd64) only detects:
real mem = 3488907264 (3407136K)
avail mem = 2990874624 (2920776K)
bios detects all 4 GB's.
kernel is GENERIC.MP.
Is it possible to use all available memory?
tnx in advance, Cris.
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian
2006/11/23, Conrad Winchester [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I do have one question though and I apologize if people always ask this: At
the end of the install I asked whether I want to run sshd and ntpd by
default - very nice BUT why am I not given the option to turn off Sendmail
at this point? I NEVER
Hi,
i have a system (Dell 1950) with 4.0 release.
At boot time (during starting network) i randomly (maybe once every 3
boot) i got:
bnx1: /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/if_bnx.c(2271): Firmware synchronization
timeout! msg_data = 0x01030007
kernel: type 1061382 trap, code=6871
and system stop.
In
From http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PkgFind following URLs:
liIn the package lists on the OpenBSD website:
ul
lia href=http://www.openbsd.org/4.0_packages/;Packages for OpenBSD 4.0/a
but: http://www.openbsd.org/4.0_packages/
Not Found
The requested URL /4.0_packages/ was not found on
2006/8/15, Jacob Yocom-Piatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
does anyone on list have a nagios plugin that will check the status of isakmpd
on an openbsd machine?
Hi,
I used ike-scan (http://www.nta-monitor.com/tools/ike-scan/) to check
if a vpn is up.
Then a shell script exiting with 0,1 or 2 status if
2006/6/21, Joco Salvatti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Let's suppose an attacker entered the room where an OpenBSD server is
located in, and by mistake the system administrator has forgotten to
logout the root login session.
http://www.darkwing.com/idled/
So the attacker could enter in single
user
2006/5/12, S t i n g r a y [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
how can i find whats wrong ?
check your dns configuration and try:
UseDNS=no in your sshd_config
arp -na
if it's fast means your dns have some problems
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
Hi,
i'm new on OpenBSD. I just installed 3.9 (one week ago sources) and i got this:
$ uname -rs
OpenBSD 3.9
$ su
Password:
you are not in group wheel
Sorry
$ whoami
cris
$ id cris
uid=1000(cris) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel)
$ grep cris /etc/passwd
cris:*:1000:0:Cristiano Deana:/home/cris:/bin
2006/5/2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
$ id cris
uid=1000(cris) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel)
Probably would have essentially identical behavior on any BSD/Linux.
No, in FreeBSD if your group is '0' then you (obviously) are in the
'wheel' group
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian
2006/5/2, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
See su(1):
It is not sufficient to change a user's /etc/passwd entry to add them
to the ``wheel'' group; they must explicitly be listed in /etc/group.
Yes, i have seen. The 'strange' thing, IMHO is:
# grep ^%wheel /etc/sudoers
%wheel ALL=(ALL)
37 matches
Mail list logo
