On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 9:30 PM, macintoshzoom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which hex editor do you advise?
Should I have to umount the partition before?
the partition is 40 GB size on a secondary disk, OpenBSD old slice,
should I need at least such space (/tmp ?) to open it on the hex editor
from
Just open your disk in a hex editor and look for your data, it should be here.
As of last week, the T61 is available with the same drive that comes with
the X300 and is both cheaper and available with more (and faster) options.
But what about the size? Because size does matter. :p
I'm sad to see this obvious troll working.
Speaking of RAMdisks, have you checked out Gigabyte i-RAM? Might be
the right stuff for your need.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Girish Venkatachalam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18:09:37 Mar 27, Uwe Dippel wrote:
[snip]
-Girish
Are you sure you used the STL?
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/kernel/KMcode.mspx
Read the section about Libraries:
Although much of the Standard Template Library is implemented as source
code in headers, it occasionally uses library functions or other
features that are not
Having a kernel with managed code is not necessarily idiotic (although
I think in most cases smart pointers do the job better).
However having chosen C# is in my opinion not optimal. C# is very
limited when it comes to generic and meta-programming.
I think modern-styled C++ (ie template
I don't think it is relevant or even polite to question one's
abilities when discussing technical matters.
If you have a point to make, please proceed.
Have you ever been involved in OS design and implementation? And I do
not mean academic exercises, but a real world project producing
it some
serious thoughts, again, time is missing. ;)
--
Die Gestalt
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 01:16:16PM +0100, Die Gestalt wrote:
I don't think it is relevant or even polite to question one's
abilities when discussing
On Nov 18, 2007 2:34 AM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/07, Die Gestalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to be explained why you have to do all these steps to encrypt
a partition. Isn't it possible to have some sort of filter driver that
simply ciphers and deciphers data
ciphers and deciphers data as it is received, a little bit like
a GEOM plugin?
--
Die Gestalt
On Nov 16, 2007 12:36 AM, Clint Pachl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nonetheless, the bonnie++ results may provide some insight to the
problem for an experienced guru. What I found interesting is that the
CPU usage is really low for writes and rewrites when svnd is backed by
the whole disk. This is
experience with full volume encryption is that impact on
performance should be below 5%, depending on the implementation, the
algorithms used, etc.
Is there a way to see where the CPU spends most of this time? This
sounds like there are unneccessary requests between the different
actors.
--
Die Gestalt
.
Your call.
--
Die Gestalt
as one.
I understand the pragmatic approach of wanting to have a working
driver as fast as possible, but if this hurts the project consistency
and will do more wrong than good in the long term.
A binary driver can always be made available as a separate addition.
--
Die Gestalt
Why doesn't he run the monitoring software in a virtual machine?
On 8/28/07, Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this article interesting.
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6204348.html
--
Terry
http://tyson.homeunix.org
http://www.UnixByte.com
Good point.
On 8/28/07, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/28/07, Die Gestalt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why doesn't he run the monitoring software in a virtual machine?
Because it would violate his parole? Who cares anyway?
If you can't do the time don't do the crime.
---
Lars
is running through, I find it
a bit out of place that he complains about not being allowed to use
Linux when he could be sitting in a cell.
Basically the deal is It's ok you use a computer in a way we can
watch the pr0n you l33ch.
--
Die Gestalt
On 8/18/07, Jona Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, sorry, seems like I didn't do my homework.
I know that they also offer Windows so they must have other solutions
than Virtuozzo/OpenVZ.
Thanks for all your replies!
Jona
Virtuozzo supports Linux and Windows NT, but on different
You mean with or without ftp-proxy?
On 8/3/07, soulshepard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there any other way of getting ftp+ssl to pass normally on a bsd box?
soul.
Die Gestalt wrote:
All I can tell you is I had for a while a ftp + ssl server running
(and yes ftp + ssl is useful in some
All I can tell you is I had for a while a ftp + ssl server running
(and yes ftp + ssl is useful in some scenarii) behind a pf machine and
it all worked perfectly well.
The problem is that you get first a SSL handshake and then all the
rest is ciphered, preveting ftp-proxy from doing its work.
Everytime you use the option MTRR a kitten dies.
On 7/19/07, Timo Schoeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc@,
just out of curiosity: What's the reason for MTRR being disabled by default?
Thanks for enlightment,
Timo :)
You could patch one binary of /usr with a trojan/virus to read the
content of /etc and send it via mail to a machine of yours (or
whatever scheme you can think of). Full volume protection (FVE)is
made, amongst other things, to protect against offline attacks/pre os
attacks. If you don't cipher
Performance is around 20 MB/s but requires a modification in
intr_machdep.c... :s I'm ashamed. :x It also requires APIC to be off.
On 7/16/07, Richard Storm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is crappy howto. *encryption* there are as much as creating
unsecure (without -K)
single storage volume...
We are talking about full disk encryption here, like mounting
encrypted root partition :)
Basically you would like to have the
On 7/17/07, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why encrypt the whole disk? I can see why you'd want to encrypt user
data - say, /home - but why encrypt boring stuff like /usr?
This makes cryptanalysis harder since it's impossible to distinguish
interesting data from uninteresting
For partition encryption you can use vnconfig.
On 7/15/07, Richard Storm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am very interested in full disk encryption too.
I guess it comes slowly, since there now is mount_vnd in -current,
maybe could make use of it.
If you find out something, give me know :)
nat on $cif from !($cif) - ($cif:0)
The problem is that !($cif) includes $dif
nat on $dif from !($dif) - ($dif:0)
and !($dif) includes $cif.
XX I NEED TO CHANGE TO SOMETHING LIKE THIS X
nat on $cif from ($iif:network) - ($cif:0)
nat on $dif from ($iif:network) - ($dif:0)
There are devices out there to measure the consumption of electric
devices. Just plug it to the input of your computer and you will get
something accurate, including the energy wasted by the power unit
itself.
On 7/9/07, f.janczuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all there.
I'm trying to make a
Do you have pf enabled and if yes can you share with us your pf.conf?
It sounds like you nat everything including one of your incoming
connection. When the request arrives on one interface it gets natted
to the other.
On 7/6/07, Srebrenko Sehic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both work just fine. I myself, always run SCSI via mpi(4). Works like
a charm and performs quite well.
I confirm. I have several OpenBSD 4.1 VM in VMWare 6. Some use IDE,
some SCSI. No difference from what I can tell.
31 matches
Mail list logo
