On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Adam Thompson wrote:
> On the FreeBSD side, at least, it depends on exactly how the server was
> ordered - there are apparently a wide variety of disk controllers to be found
> in otherwise-identical servers. I don't recall which ones were problematic.
> -Adam
Doubtful, but with the magic of over-the-air updates these days, it
should be a simple patch given sufficient motivation on their part.
--Doug
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Jeremy Chase wrote:
> I'm sure they'll recall all the CD's and reprint them.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> :) well, possible to sit through those again? This time, prepare your
> camera. :)
Here's the best I got:
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/image.php?5bec65cccf.jpg - SGI
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/image.php?29f575c27e.jpg - Rgindael/A
Misc,
I sat through the ending credits of Rock Band 3 for the PS3
tonight, and I saw a license inclusion from OpenBSD. I'm guessing they
lifted some bit of code and used it in the game. Does anyone have any
idea what portion it might have been?
There were also license notifications for AES, MD5
I see a number of changes in the 4.8 changelog referencing additions
of AES-NI and AES-GCM. This PDF from Intel extolls the (rather
astounding) virtues for linux:
http://edc.intel.com/Link.aspx?id=3754
Has anyone published any performance numbers for this on OpenBSD
running on fancy new Intel pro
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> In short, gif(4) will fragment packets just fine (actually it is the
> normal IP fragmenting in ip_output()). So in theory you could forward
> jumbo frames over a link with less then 1500 bytes by using a big MTU
> gif(4) on a bridge. This wor
Hi,
From the man page for bridge (4):
If an IP packet is too large for the outgoing interface, the bridge will
perform IP fragmentation. This can happen when bridge members have
different MTUs or when IP fragments are reassembled by pf. Non-IP
packets which are too large f
On 2/21/07, stuartv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So now to my question. What software works really well for
> an internal mail server? I would like some spam protection
> and I NEED Anti-virus, and I need it all to work even when
> a customer sends an email with a 50M file attachment because
> t
My mistake. He appeared to be complaining about stuttering during other
activities, only including reading id-3 tags as an example.
--Doug
On 5/18/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 5/18/06, Doug Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Check this:
Check this: http://www.geocities.com/phileosophos/tech/pcilatency.html
--Doug
On 5/18/06, Emmanuel Jarri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It was/is the case for me too ! :-(
> The workaround I use is to increase buffer size to its maximum, i.e. 13MB,
> with 50% to upper pre buffer.
> It works quite
10 matches
Mail list logo
