opensmtp

Hello I haven't been following the latest openbsd development very closely...shame on me :-( I just wanted to know how the current development of opensmtp is going? Is it ready for prime time or still considered as to early in development? Thanks

Re: Role of the package system when following -current

Hi, I do check the ftp server regularly and look what date the current snapshot and the respective packages are of. If the packages snapshots have been updated since my last upgrade and the snapshots date and packages date are quite near together, I do update my system. For doing so I use the

Re: cwm default window placement

On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Martin Toft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 08:04:51PM +0200, Earin Gregor wrote: Only question still remains: Is there a way to keep one window/application always raised above others? Would be nice in my case for xclock :-) Try

cwm default window placement

Hello First of I want to say I really enjoy cwm alot!! I'm learning new things about it every day and I'm really pleased. My question now is about default placement of windows. I do start a few applications via my .xsession file. Most notably an xterm and xclock. Is it now possible to place

Re: cwm default window placement

On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Martin Toft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 07:24:24PM +0200, Earin Gregor wrote: My question now is about default placement of windows. I do start a few applications via my .xsession file. Most notably an xterm and xclock. Is it now

libc.so Problem with snapshot from 14 June

Good day everyone I tried today to upgrade to the snapshot of the 14 June. All went fine as usual. Before I used a snapshot from hmm about a month ago (don't remember correctly). After a final reboot xdm did no longer start with an error message of a missing libc.so.45.0 After some investigation

Re: libc.so Problem with snapshot from 14 June

Thank you Markus and Otto for your quick answers. That clarifies a lot!

Re: snapshots

On 10/30/07, Josh Grosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:55:29 +, Stefan Olsson wrote I've been using snapshots quite a bit lately but am a little bit confused regarding the snapshot packages vs the snapshots themselves. At the time of writing there are i386 snapshots