Oldest Server you run

2006-10-12 Thread Falk Husemann

Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to  
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?



As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard  
disk and a connection to the internet. So no Newton or toaster (at  
least not if there's no disk being toasted).



Thank you in advance,
Falk



Mixing S-ATA and P-ATA

2006-07-06 Thread Falk Husemann

Hello list!
It's me again (http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/ 
2006-06/1876.html).



My system doesn't make it past the bootloader where it says disk:  
fd0. S- and P-ATA disks don't get listed and the system hangs.


My system consists of two Sil3152 with four S-ATA disks, a P-ATA  
PSD20268 controller with two disks, a DVD-Rom on the onbard primary  
and a (openbsd system)harddisk on the onboard seconday P-ATA channel.  
I was able to boot to the Installation routine, if I removed the two  
S-ATA controllers. Everything gets detected correctly by the BIOS.



Booting after the Installation with one or two S-ATA controllers -  
nada. Same goes if I remove all P-ATA Equipment beside the DVD-ROM -  
everything works fine and the box boots from CD.



Thanks in advance,
Falk



Re: Recommendation for RAID-Array

2006-06-29 Thread Falk Husemann

Hi again!
I'll be buying four SATA disks, three for a RAID5 using RAIDframe and  
one as spare (put in my closet). It'll run via two SATA controllers.  
I'll stick with the cheapo stuff, as 	Stuart suggested and add some  
2gig memory to the box too.


Karsten, I'm a student, I won't need no hw raid.


Someone sent mail to me offlist, here's what he said:
PLEASE know that RAID5 is not a BACKUP solution!
PLEASE backup to REMOVABLE and RELIABLE storage!

I bet he's right ;-)



Thanks for the replys (it really helped me),
Falk



Re: Configuring pppoe during installation?

2006-06-22 Thread Falk Husemann

On 22.06.2006, at 10:06, Michael Lechtermann wrote:

Hi!


I doubt anyone would be totally angry when he needs to hit ENTER one
more time to skip that question.


No doubt my name is anyone. I'd be angry.

It's not about hitting Return one more time, it's integrating  
something new into the Installation Floppy. And you REALLY don't want  
to drop Floppy Installation support or favor CDs.


Do we need dumb question asking wizards that mutch? I came to this  
place to avoid them.


The hostname.if system is good, as it is.



Falk



Re: Configuring pppoe during installation?

2006-06-22 Thread Falk Husemann

On 22.06.2006, at 12:04, Michael Lechtermann wrote:

Hi!


You surely do not want to say no to dozens of network questions (and
maybe a lot of other stuff)

Thats why I suggested to make just one question that asks if you would
like to to any optional setup. Default answer [n]. If you choose yes,
only then you'll get the additional questions, whatever they might be.


Why do you insist on adding more stuff to the Installation instead of  
removing some?


You're confusing people with additional optional Installation  
questions.

The routine is good, as it is now.

 If you need this addition to happen so badly, do it (as Paul  
suggested).




Falk



Re: multiple publicIPs

2006-05-06 Thread Falk Husemann

On 06.05.2006, at 15:25, Peter Blair wrote:


Perhaps I'm confused, but it doesn't look (from your diagram) that
your pf machine is acting as a firewall for anything but itself.


I'd bet 4 ClubMate that he'd drawn the diagram wrogn



Re: using torrents for packages?

2006-05-03 Thread Falk Husemann

Isn`t it be possible to switch to torrents to install packages?


Are you talking about a torrent for each package?  No thanks.


Grab them while you can, honey ;-)
http://charybdis.xenon-nrw.net/~josen/OpenBSD_39_amd64_torrent/


This thread is the funniest and most useless I ever saw on misc. Who  
would really want to distribute OpenBSD by torrent? For each single  
package...



LOL


-Falk



Re: Anyone Interested in Programmable AMD Coprocessors?

2006-04-23 Thread Falk Husemann
I (maybe like you) just read the corresponding article on TheRegister 
(http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/04/21/drc_fpga_module/).


I'd bet it wont make it to mainstream if compilers don't support it.

What do you think?


Greets,
Falk



Re: pf blocking nets in a way like *.google.com ?

2006-04-21 Thread Falk Husemann

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

That doesn`t mean I can use *.google.com but I would be able to use
www.google.com if I understood the FAQ and the manual correctly.
Because I may not be bale to know every Hostname in a foreign network a
Joker would be a neat solution.

Is it maybe planed to add any joker to PF so that such stuff would be
possible in the future if it isn`t already possible?
  


Why isn't it feasible to use Googles allocated netblock (216.239.32.0/19)?

Maybe you could use a script to update a table in pf using whois and 
grep for the CIDR/Netrange in the reply.



Greets,
Falk



Which Hardware for Firewall

2006-04-10 Thread Falk Husemann

Hello misc!
We're using OpenBSD on our Hardware since 2003 and have run our  
Firewall on OpenBSD since that time too (always following -STABLE).


Now the box i once built for that purpose has broken down and I'm in  
need of a replacement I'll assemble myself again. The box serves a  
squid, a pf (with 2 and 1/2 pages DinA4 ruleset), named and httpd-SSL


The hardware will be on the low to medium end (budget 400-600 EURO).



Which processor architecture is faster for firewalling purposes? pf  
runs in kernelspace AFAIK, so will dual-core be useless? AMD64?  
Pentium 4?



I thought about buying 2GB+ of RAM and running parts of the system  
from RAM (tmp, squid-cache). Is this possible on OpenBSD? A quick  
google search did not turn up anything.



A quick hint would be sufficent, I don't want to get on someones  
wick, but theres no information about firewall hardware and obsd on  
the net.




Thanks in advance,
Falk



Re: writing to /var/log/ftpd

2006-02-06 Thread Falk Husemann

RTFM.