On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Sebastian Rother
sebastian.rot...@jpberlin.de wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:33:34 -0500
Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
Thos who take my but-reports to fix their own crappy code should be
more quiet. Don't you think so too Marco? Or wait: You
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* Douglas A. Tutty dtu...@vianet.ca [2008-12-30 02:39]:
crappy applications are still crappy applications on OpenBSD, but
worse on pretty much any other OS.
IIUC, with ports right now, to get security fixes you
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Marco Matarazzo marm...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not true. It's more tricky, but you can actually limit both inbound
and outbound at the port level, and it's quite effective too. Of course
Hello ]V[arco and all the others that responded to this question,
I have an ISP situation where there is about 1000 users sitting behind Cisco
3550 switches. Each port is 1 user and is configured with an individual
VLAN where each VLAN is assigned a small network subnet and corresponding
DHCP scope.
The problem is that it seems (so I have been told) is these
4 matches
Mail list logo
