Re: disk lights on but top showed nothing!
Perhaps it was your Megaraid controller doing a patrol read or consistency check? -Taru On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 12:13 PM Luke Small wrote: > 6 disk raid 10 15000 rpm array (2 mirroring x 3 striping) with a raid card > which can handle a maximum of 8 disks. It didn’t last forever. > > mfii0 at pci12 dev 0 function 0 "Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS2208" rev 0x05: > msi > mfii0: "LSI MegaRAID SAS 9271-8i", firmware 23.28.0-0010, 1024MB cache > scsibus2 at mfii0: 64 targets > sd0 at scsibus2 targ 0 lun 0: > naa.600605b00902fb50217c572a11e3e137 > sd0: 418464MB, 512 bytes/sector, 857014272 sectors > scsibus3 at mfii0: 256 targets > ppb11 at pci7 dev 9 function 0 "Intel X58 PCIE" rev 0x22: msi > pci13 at ppb11 bus 135 > "Intel X58 IOxAPIC" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 19 function 0 not configured > "Intel X58 Misc" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 20 function 0 not configured > "Intel X58 GPIO" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 20 function 1 not configured > "Intel X58 RAS" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 20 function 2 not configured > "Intel X58 Throttle" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 20 function 3 not configured > "Intel X58 QuickData" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 22 function 0 not configured > "Intel X58 QuickData" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 22 function 1 not configured > "Intel X58 QuickData" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 22 function 2 not configured > "Intel X58 QuickData" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 22 function 3 not configured > "Intel X58 QuickData" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 22 function 4 not configured > "Intel X58 QuickData" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 22 function 5 not configured > "Intel X58 QuickData" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 22 function 6 not configured > "Intel X58 QuickData" rev 0x22 at pci7 dev 22 function 7 not configured > vmm0 at mainbus0: VMX/EPT > dt: 445 probes > vscsi0 at root > scsibus4 at vscsi0: 256 targets > softraid0 at root > scsibus5 at softraid0: 256 targets > sd1 at scsibus5 targ 1 lun 0: > sd1: 418458MB, 512 bytes/sector, 857002898 sectors > sd2 at scsibus1 targ 5 lun 0: > naa.5001173100147bc4 > sd2: 95367MB, 512 bytes/sector, 195312501 sectors > sd3 at scsibus1 targ 6 lun 0: > naa.5001173100146d54 > sd3: 95367MB, 512 bytes/sector, 195312501 sectors > sd4 at scsibus1 targ 7 lun 0: > naa.50011731001432cc > sd4: 95367MB, 512 bytes/sector, 195312501 sectors > sd5 at scsibus1 targ 8 lun 0: > naa.500117310014346c > sd5: 95367MB, 512 bytes/sector, 195312501 sectors > disklabels not read: > root on sd1a (7f4c2a49b672064f.a) swap on sd1b dump on sd1b > radeondrm0: CAICOS > radeondrm0: 1920x1080, 32bpp > wsdisplay0 at radeondrm0 mux 1: console (std, vt100 emulation), using > wskbd0 > wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (std, vt100 emulation) > > On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 4:22 AM Crystal Kolipe > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 12:01:28AM -0600, Luke Small wrote: > > > The lights on my server which shows that the disks are busy were on and > > not > > > just flashing and I looked at top and usually it???s because security > is > > > running, but this time NOTHING! I even killed Firefox and by far the > > > busiest thing on there was top! pftop didn???t seem especially busy > > either! > > > > From the extremely limited information you've given, it's hard to > diagnose > > the problem. > > > > In future, please include the output of dmesg and the output of relevant > > commands in problem reports. This answers questions such as: how many > > disks are in this server? Are they part of an array? > > > > Did the output from top show a process with low or zero cpu usage, but > > stuck in the biowait state? > > > > This can happen, for example, if you have a bad or failing data cable > from > > the disk to the motherboard. It can also happen with some SSDs, likely > due > > to the firmware doing some kind of internal management of the flash > memory. > > > -- > -Luke >
Re: Syntax error in pf rules
Per http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/macros.html
It looks like your list should look like:
vpnip = "{ 77.90.247.88, 112.119.192.26, 85.95.253.145, 31.210.111.78,
66.85.14.205, 54.201.110.154 }"
Taru
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Adam Smith wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I have a syntax error in my pf rules. I hope you can help me fix it.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> -snippet of my pf rules-
>
> #This is where I change or add different IP addresses of VPN gateways
>
> vpnip="77.90.247.88, 112.119.192.26, 85.95.253.145, 31.210.111.78,
> 66.85.14.205, 54.201.110.154"
>
>
>
> #Below is the rule that OpenBSD tells me there's a syntax error
>
> pass out quick on $wan proto tcp from any to $vpnip port 443 keep state
>
> -end of snippet-
> http://www.DCpages.com
Re: Sorry OpenBSD people, been a bit busy
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:57 PM, noah pugsley noah.pugs...@gmail.com wrote: Slander aside, pretty cool news. I do have one stupid question though, what does the 'yy' in yycix stand for? On 10/6/13, dera...@cvs.openbsd.org dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote: Hi, yeah, it is really me. I find it strange posting to misc, starting an email thread. Normally I finish the threads here. Most OpenBSD developers have known for a while, but I think it is important to tell the greater community that I've been a bit busy for about the last year. I have not been paying as much attention to OpenBSD development as I'm expected to. Luckily, other developers have done a great job keeping it on track. Why? With a group of others, I started setting up an Internet Exchange in Calgary, and this has taken much time because it is highly politicized and has encountered some resistance. http://yycix.ca https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YYCIX_Internet_Exchange_Community_Ltd Now, why do I mention this in relation to OpenBSD? Well, at the end of 2007 someone decided to open an impersonation account on twitter in my name, and start sending a mix of things I have said (see wikiquote for instance), with things that I would never say. That account is http://twitter.com/theoderaadt A few notes: The account has now changed to declare that it is a parody account and renamed to Not Theo de Raadt, as of a few days ago. If you read back into the past, you will see true character of the account and the individual. People in the local community were directed to the account, to give a negative, if not slanderous, view of my character. The ones directing them have high-profile roles in the community, so people would take what they say as true. Since I am the network manager for the exchange equipment, this by extension was meant to hurt YYCIX. Why would stewards of important infrastructure projects deliberately spread such false stories? I will not mention names. I don't need to; many can dig a little and figure out who those actors are. As a hint, search a little bit higher. Finally, one thing that particularily bothers me in the old postings is the mention of my old friend Itojun, a very dedicated developer of IPv6. As many of you know, he and John Postel are the only two internet architects currently honoured on an annual basis by the Internet Society in the form of an award. http://www.internetsociety.org/what-we-do/grants-and-awards/awards/itojun-service-award Layers of hurt being thrown around. Why? YYC is the IATA code for Calgary airport. Taru
Re: Selecting new motherboards in the era of uefi
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@osvaldobarrera.com.ar wrote: On 2013-08-30 17:32, STeve Andre' wrote: I'm shopping around for new server hardware. Unless someone has a reason to think of something else, I'm planing on a i7-4770K. The more interesting question is what motherboard to get. I have my eye on the Asus Sabertooth Z87, but I see that it talks of uefi. What I do not yet see, is whether the system can boot in a non- uefi mode or not. Given that the motherboard is at least a little OS agnostic, I have some hope that it will work. But I don't know, and in general I think it might be worth talking of strategies for motherboard selection given the size of the marketplace. I wonder if this might make a new section Thoughts? --STeve Andre' Hint: The specs [1] say it supports Windows 7. Windows 7 is BIOS-only (non-UEFI), so that means the mobo supports booting legacy BIOS. [1] http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/SABERTOOTH_Z87/#specifications -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] The ASUS support page shows all systems that support linux operating systems, including the Z87. http://www.asus.com/websites/global/aboutASUS/OS/Linux1308.pdf Taru
