Recently on some apache reverse proxy servers we have encountered the dreaded
/bsd: uvm_mapent_alloc: out of static map entries in the logs. To the point
where the system has become unresponsive and died.
This has occurred on OpenBSD 3.9 i386 and OpenBSD 4.0 amd64. I am unsure
exactly what is
information would be helpful. Thought I might have
to assign a metric to each interface but I don't think that will do
anything as each interface is for a route to a separate network.
Cheers
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:53:58AM +0100, Paul Civati wrote:
Linden Varley
Bringing up an old-topic here, but just letting everyone know I have the
exact same problem. It occurs quite often.
One of my links goes down, the routes change, but when the link comes
back up the routes don't go back to the default lower-cost one and I
have to restart ospfd in order to
Hi all
Is there any way to force ospfd to use routes with a lower-cost metric?
ospfctl reload doesn't work, it still sends packets via a route with a
higher cost metric than what is possible with another route. Only
restarting the ospfd daemon will make it use the proper routes again.
Any
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could offer any solution to this OSPFD error
when it starts up:
ospfd[11601]: send_packet: error sending packet on interface em0: No
route to host
It says there is no route to host for every interface defined in ospfd.conf
This is using the default config on
Not sure what you were originally after but I came across this the other day
http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html
- Linden.
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Tuesday 17 July 2007, Edd Barrett wrote:
HI,
On 17/07/07, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Edd,
I was curious if you ever
Hi all,
I can't for the life of me get any route-to rules working with packet
filter.
i.e
pass in on fxp1 route-to (fxp1 $host) inet proto tcp from any to any
port 80
This to me implies that any traffic coming in on fxp1, port 80 should be
routed to $host ?
Am I correct in this
We host our own web-servers so DSR shouldn't be a problem. Will probably
get rid of the co-located balancers and bring them inside our network as
we dont really gain anything from co-locating. Might just use something
simple like lbnamed !
Adam wrote:
Linden Varley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
with BalanceNG for the time-being.
Cheers,
Linden.
Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:42:24AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:54:58 +0800
Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linden Varley wrote:
Anyone know of any load balancing software
on different subnets and I need the load-balancers
to have a common-ip to which they could then proxy to one of the two sites.
- Linden
Adam wrote:
Linden Varley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only reason we need DSR is our load-balancers are co-located and we
have a limit on data usage so
Hi,
Anyone know of any load balancing software for OpenBSD that can do
direct-server return? (our load balancers (openbsd boxes) are co-located
and we pay for all data bandwidth).
Something like BalanceNG (which unfortunately doesnt run on OpenBSD)
woudl be ideal.
It is generally for http
Hi all,
We are experiencing the exact same problem as described here
http://www.nabble.com/Re:-kernel-5437-t3504800.html
Dell 1950, bnx chipset, OpenBSD 4.1 using packet filter with redirect rules.
Packets seem to get redirected fine, but the return packets dont get
through due to a bad
Hi all,
I've seen this problem crop up before with other people, but can someone
please explain to me why compiling apache with the mpm=worker
directive (i.e threads) does not work as expected on OpenBSD ? (3.6, 3.9
4.0)
Initital connections to the server seem to hang and get no response
I've re-compiled the kernel with option procfs and I still get the
error mount_procfs: /proc: Filesystem not supported by kernel when
mounting.
What else could I be missing ?
Cheers,
Linden.
14 matches
Mail list logo
