Joe Davis wrote
>> Some writers swear on Scrivener. It's proprietary and Mac/Win only,
>> though.
>
> Manuskript[1] looks promising as a foss alternative. Haven't attempted
> to build it on OpenBSD. None of the dependencies look to be a major
> problem.
>
> Cheers,
> Joe
>
> [1]: http://www.theo
s still in alpha, but provides a host of tooling that might be of
interest to the list.
I wrote a short review here[0], but sourcehut.org provides a good
introduction.
Regards,
Mark Jamsek
[0]
https://jamsek.dev/posts/2019/Sep/27/sourcehut-open-source-software-development-platform/
--
Sent
done:
$ type nc6
nc6 is an alias for 'netcalc -6'
Regards,
Mark Jamsek
--
Sent from: http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/openbsd-user-misc-f3.html
Hi Martin,
Here you go:
https://jamsek.dev/resources/pub/netcalc/netcalc03.c
No switch needed for IPv4 or IPv6.
Regards,
Mark Jamsek
--
Sent from: http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/openbsd-user-misc-f3.html
a man page.
Regards,
Mark Jamsek
--
Sent from: http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/openbsd-user-misc-f3.html
Ingo Schwarze wrote
> Avstin Kim wrote:
>
>> My question is, how is the OpenBSD Project governance structured;
>
> There is no formal structure and no "governance".
>
> ...
>
> If your choice of operating system depends on any kind of formalities
> rather than on technical quality, OpenBSD is n
6 matches
Mail list logo
