? Will it be documented in the man page ?
Thanks,
Matthias Bertschy
in both isakmpd and
racoon; but I haven't found a fix yet.
Matthias Bertschy
Bob Beck wrote:
* Matthias Bertschy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 11:26]:
I think this would only make sense if authpf could stand multiple
connections from same host...
Unfortunately, it is not possible: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/msg08318.html
pf.conf
3. ??? magic spell ???
I am sure some PF wizards already have the solution for me... thanks in
advance.
Matthias Bertschy
PS: here are my PF rules...
(If stands for interface)
(Gw stands for gateway)
pass out on $ISP1If route-to ($ISP2If $ISP2Gw) from $ISP2If keep state
pass out
I think this would only make sense if authpf could stand multiple
connections from same host...
Unfortunately, it is not possible:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg08318.html
So, I still wonder why such a feature exists...
Matthias Bertschy
Matthias Bertschy wrote:
Ted
Ted Unangst wrote:
2. Is anybody using it successfully?
honestly, about the only thing i can think of is that instead of
having per user authpf rules, you could create tables named by user,
and reference them by $user_id. i don't know if this works.
I think you have a point here.
Well, in fact, I was wondering:
1. What is the purpose of the $user_id macro in authpf rules?
2. Is anybody using it successfully?
3. Is it possible to use it to track per user traffic?
Thanks if you read this and help me :-)
Matthias Bertschy
Matthias Bertschy wrote:
Hello
for that...
Hmm, I would really like to have this wonderfull tool with pfflowd on my
network routers :-)
Matthias Bertschy
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Ok, I assume you no longer have the core file you generated early. If
there's a bug i pax, I really like to fix it... I'll see if I can
reproduce the problem on a file system with lots of links and while
giving pax little memory.
-Otto
Unfortunately not :-(
But
because I really don't know what to do next.
Matthias Bertschy
Echo Technologies SA
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 06:22:05PM +0200, Matthias Bertschy wrote:
Would it be possible to implement such a tool that works for tun, gif,
gre, pppoe, ...
The features would be load balancing and fail over with virtual interfaces.
I see no need
isn't implemented yet with gif(4)
driver...
Would it be possible to implement it?
I know pf(4) can also do load balancing, but I find this way less
intuitive as the resulting interface cannot be monitored as easily as a
trunk(4).
Thanks for your help.
Matthias Bertschy
OpenBSD 3.9 on i386
Jason McIntyre wrote:
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 12:01:20PM +0200, Matthias Bertschy wrote:
I would like to use a round robin aggregation of 2 (or more) gif(4)
interfaces.
trunk.4:
The trunk interface allows aggregation of multiple network
interfaces as one virtual
Hello,
From my previous post, it looks like trunk(4) cannot be used for
software based pseudo-devices.
Would it be possible to implement such a tool that works for tun, gif,
gre, pppoe, ...
The features would be load balancing and fail over with virtual interfaces.
Thanks.
Matthias
not doing anything bad...
Of course, once they have been tested by Kenneth, he will surely add
them to CVS.
I saw several
changes in the sources beyond 3.9-release, but it'd be easier to check
with the diffs around.
For sure :-)
Cheers,
Rogier
Matthias Bertschy
I have encountered this problem, and Kenneth helped me with some diffs.
I have tested them and they work, but I don't know if they are already
in CVS...
The main problem comes from ifconfig, but dhclient needs a patch too.
Good luck!
Matthias Bertschy
Rogier Krieger wrote:
When using
Personaly I use: http://ipcheck.sourceforge.net/
riwanlky wrote:
Hi,
I will like to know if OpenBSD have the capability to update my
dynamic ip to www.dyndns.org.
I am currently running myDYNIPPRO on Windows to update my dynamic ip.
I want to
move to OpenBSD. I had currently running
:01:31 riri dhclient[26486]: exiting.
Thanks in advance.
Matthias Bertschy
Here is the dmesg output:
$ dmesg
OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 02:26:48 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.90GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 1.92
than 1T.
Ok, well, I am not a system programmer, but would it be difficult to
make an OpenBSD support for 2Tbyte file systems like on Linux? (for
the moment terabyte server runs Linux, but I would prefer OpenBSD)
Thanks for your help!
Matthias Bertschy
19 matches
Mail list logo