Has anybody been able to run OpenBSD 4.0 or newer under Parallels
Desktop? Booting the 3.9 media works just fine and I am able to
install the OS. Booting 4.0 (or newer snapshots) media results in a
lock-up of the VM at the (I)nstall/(U)pgrade prompt. I'd post a
dmesg(1) but I'm unable to
I replied to Ben privately already, but the lack of powerpc package
snapshots is due to a short term problem with the machine that should
get resolved soon... in case others wonder.
is the new prebinding code in 4.0?
The code is there. It is not being used by anything yet. There
are things which need to be worked out.
and this stuff is documented in the ldconfig(8) manpage, see -P,
if you want to play.
Can I use the bg, and soft options in a /etc/fstab entry
that references a NFS mounted filesystem?
The idea is to allow the machine to boot, even if the machine
NFS server machine is unavailable.
Read mount_nfs(8), there are options that do what you want. Of course
understand that while
I've installed and configured OpenBSD 3.9 on an Asus P5RD1-VM
motherboard (ATI Xpress 200), but was kind of sad when I found out
that the onboard NIC Realtek RTL8201CL wasn't supported by OpenBSD. It
has only two PCIs slots, but I need three working NICs on it...
So I'd just like to know some
Acer Labs M5263 LAN rev 0x50 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 not configured
this definitely does not look like a realtek; some references
seem to suggest a tulip. you could try to see if this does
anything (try both de(4) and dc(4) in your kernel), but no high
hopes. btw is this some ancient
No no not wrong, indeed I didn't talk about being positive. But being
prime is being positive (should have said it I agree) and have EXACTLY
TWO different divisors. And if 1 were prime you wouldn't have only one
unique decomposition in prime numbers ;) (for exemple, is 45 = 3x3x5 or
The Feb 15 X snapshot should have this fixed.
3.9 beta was not fun for me, so I am reinstalling to 3.8 -Stable.
For whatever reason I forgot that securelevel was set to 2, but
'make build' is running alright at the moment.
Did you have a problem with 3.9-beta that you want to report?
Otherwise who knows, you'll probably have the same
Might be a better way in the archives, but...
edit ettercap/patches/patch-src_ec_plugins_c
change the inserted line to always be true, e.g.:
-#if defined(OPENBSD) || defined(MACOSX)
+#if 1
#define SYM_PREFIX _ // for the symbols loaded with dlsym
#else
#define SYM_PREFIX
That's wrong. And you quoted the wrong patch, the actual patch does
this and it's correct as-is:
-#if defined(OPENBSD) || defined(MACOSX)
+#if defined(OPENBSD) !defined(__ELF__) || defined(MACOSX)
except it doesn't work, exactly as the OP described. I tested it before
replying and it
if ((status (RL_ISR_TIMEOUT_EXPIRED|RL_ISR_RX_OK)) ==
^^
(RL_ISR_TIMEOUT_EXPIRED|RL_ISR_RX_OK))
^
It appears that the loop will always
This year, OpenCON hosted a mini hackathon with focus on ports. It
consisted of 4 days right before the conference, and a dozen
OpenBSD developers were present, most of them arriving on October 31st
to spend the next 4-5 days working together on improving the system.
Some of us had never met
I have a simple c++ program that throws an exception and tries to catch it.
But when I run it, it crashes with segmentation faul. Looking and the stack
trace, looks like the exception is thrown but no one catches it. Is this a
bug? There's a workaround?
Not sure when, but this has been fixed
To clarify, if you limit someone's ram use to a certain point, or
CPU use to a certain point, it will slow down compiling due to
having less resources :) As I said though - I may be wrong on
this one.
Yes, that would be the idea of limiting resources. If I am given the ability
to use
get /usr/local, /usr/ports, and /usr/src remotely mounted from my nearby
FreeBSD system. I can get the mount done, but I can't affect any files
... for example, if I tryi to touch (as root on the Zaurus)
/usr/local/garbage, I get Permission denied. i don't have any cklear
idea if this
I've been testing 3.8 on a couple of i386 systems (soon sparc also),
including installing more of the 3.8 beta packages than I would use
normally. So far I am impressed by UP/MP performance, and have
only found a couple of X applications (xtacy, xlock) failing on signal 11.
the ports@
I noticed that file can identify OGG-Files but if I try to use file
for e.g. an MP3 it reports just data even it reports a lot informations
for OGGs.
Is there any reason (exclude things like nobody provided a patch...) why
file can't identify MP3s?
I thought mp3-headers are unique
18 matches
Mail list logo
