Virtual machines/emus and canadian cross builds should be able to reduce
the amount of iron, no?
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
Through the history of openbsd there have been architectures in which
more bugs have been found and some in which fewer bugs have appeared.
That is not true.
Then maybe the number of bugs for an architecture can be matched to the
power-on-time for the machines for that architecture.
Maybe. Probably need them on to prove or disprove the point.
For example, if 1% of the total number of bugs in the history of openbsd
have appeared on architecture x, then it's likely that it will continue to
be so, then all the machines for that architecture should be powered on
just 1% of the time.
Another great advantage here is that all the pesky developers who love
those machines will go away, and we'll only need to run on the best
architectures (which of course, are big endian).
Then perform that analysis on all architectures to make a more better use
of energy. And that's it.
It's so simple. Why didn't I think of it.