Hiya folks,
As a learning project to teach myself how to use the ksh shell I wrote a
helper script to set ansi colors and decorations that I'm calling
*kshcolor*.
The script is available here for anyone who is intrigued:
https://github.com/tbullock/kshcolor
The project includes a makefile to
On 2022-01-10 3:53 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:17:25PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:24:05AM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2022-01-10 2:18 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jan 08, 2022
On 2022-01-10 3:53 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:17:25PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 02:24:05AM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2022-01-10 2:18 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jan 08, 2022
On 2022-01-10 2:18 a.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 01:43:32PM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
The manpage incorrectly describes the behaviour and usage of
pci_mapreg_probe(9). This function does not return 0 for success and !0
for failure as described in the manual, see the diff
is found or one if it finds a
+register at the BAR referenced by
+.Fa reg .
.Pp
.Nm pci_mapreg_type
returns either
--
Ted Bullock
far here. Please
send help I'm in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
--
Ted Bullock
On 2021-12-29 10:18 p.m., Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 09:27:34PM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
>> This is around documenting peculiar behaviour around power of 2 math in
>> the kernel.
>>
>> I'm wondering if it's worth documenting the peculiarities he
is_power_of_2_u64
powerof2
probably others too.
And manual checks like
sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c:804
powerof2 = ((x - 1) & x) == 0;
--
Ted Bullock
this instead
of malloc. Then argue your point, and lose...
Thanks, more or less sums it up. I'll stick to using malloc and friends;
it's got a reliable idiom for checking errors, and I have a lot of
appreciation for the rigor that's gone into the implementation.
--
Ted Bullock
of
the above?
--
Ted Bullock
On 2014-05-28 6:39 AM, pae3 wrote:
Hi!
Don't miss RTP protocol :
pass proto tcp to port 20001
ah, no RTP will be moving over UDP.
--
Ted Bullock tbull...@northernartifex.com
Real actual bob becks giving real actual ssl video chat
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GnBbhXBDmwU
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Fido network.
Original Message
From: ropers
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 7:05 PM
To: staticsafe
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: LibreSSL @ BSDCan
as the backup.
I'd prefer to not run yet another service locally if at all possible though.
I'm wondering what other folks do in this situation.
--
Ted Bullock tbull...@northernartifex.com
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Mauro Rezzonico l...@ch23.org wrote:
Ted Bullock wrote:
I am trying to install OpenBSD 4.6 on an older DL380 G3, and am unable
to get an address from DHCP using the onboard network adapter.
OpenBSD 4.6 has been released with broken support for bge, you must
:1e
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex,rxpause,txpause)
status: active
inet6 fe80::20b:cdff:fe03:c11e%bge1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
--
Ted Bullock tbull...@comlore.com
to get it at the moment.
--
Ted Bullock tbull...@comlore.com
Dave Harrison wrote:
However I'm not aware of any tools that handle that kind of
distributed benchmark.. anyone ?
httperf can be run in an array of clients (--client option), although
there is currently no way to automatically aggregate the results.
--
Theodore Bullock, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:44:10PM +1000, Damien Miller wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Open Phugu wrote:
On 5/31/07, qw er [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It really sucks. it is slow.
What you say does not apply to OpenBSD. What you said describes you.
I find it amazing that,
Steve Shockley wrote:
qw er wrote:
It really sucks. it is slow.
Not any more: http://marc.info/?m=118046279204104
.
That is too bad since I am one of those rare people sniff
-Ted
--
Theodore Bullock, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
B.Sc Software Engineering
Bike Across
Ted Unangst wrote:
you should have sent in your dmesg then. hardware that doesn't get
reported doesn't exist.
This is not really that big a deal to me. I certainly don't want to
stand in the way of progress just because I maintain an old 386 as a hobby.
I will send in the dmesg though,
I had the same problem until I updated the firmware to 4.17.1
-Ted
Landry Breuil wrote:
Hello,
i'm trying to install OpenBSD/Sparc64 on a Blade 100, tried various
methods/versions (all described in INSTALL.sparc64), they all fail after
'Trying bsd' and stall. Where can i have a start
I really like the new pkg-config tool in 4.1 and want to use it more in
my own software. My only problem with it is that there is no pkg-config
.pc files for the default libraries (eg openssl) in the default install.
For example, with openssl libcrypto and libssl go hand in hand.
pkg-config
Theo de Raadt wrote:
One very important part of the hackathon sub-project will be to
improve 10Gb support. Some of us believe that measuring the
performance of 10Gb networking later will help us spot some
performance problems that can improve 1Gb ethernet speed.
As a side note, we recently
23 matches
Mail list logo
