The universe didn't start in 1970
On Monday, October 5, 2020, Roderick wrote:
>
> The result of time() has type time_t and we know what kind of number
> goes there: seconds since 0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds, January 1,
> 1970, Coordinated Universal Time.
>
> In my FreeBSD running on a 64 bit
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 07:47:16AM -0700, Артур Истомин wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:01:17AM -0700, tekk wrote:
I'm having a bit of trouble with audio on my 5.7 box (Thinkpad T430.) Audio
is just a bit too quiet to be comfortable even when I have everything maxed
out. I had a similar
On 07/11/2015 08:23 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
I've tried playing with inputs.dac-0:1 and other values since and
the inputs.dac-* actually *do* max out at 174 for me.
So e.g. mixerctl -v inputs.dac-0:1=255 sets it to 174,174?
Exactly. inputs.dac-{0:1,2:3}=$value_above_174 simply sets it to 174.
On 07/11/2015 08:24 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jul 10 19:15:31, h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Jul 10 06:01:17, t...@parlementum.net wrote:
I'm having a bit of trouble with audio on my 5.7 box (Thinkpad T430.) Audio
is just a bit too quiet to be comfortable even when I have everything maxed
out. I had a
On 07/11/2015 12:24 PM, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said tekk on Sat, 11 Jul 2015 08:30:00 -0700:
So e.g. mixerctl -v inputs.dac-0:1=255 sets it to 174,174?
Exactly. inputs.dac-{0:1,2:3}=$value_above_174 simply sets it to 174.
It would be more helpful if instead of describing the problem
On 07/11/15 15:49, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jul 11 08:30:37, t...@parlementum.net wrote:
On 07/11/2015 08:24 AM, Jan Stary wrote:
On Jul 10 19:15:31, h...@stare.cz wrote:
On Jul 10 06:01:17, t...@parlementum.net wrote:
I'm having a bit of trouble with audio on my 5.7 box (Thinkpad T430.) Audio
is
I'm having a bit of trouble with audio on my 5.7 box (Thinkpad T430.)
Audio is just a bit too quiet to be comfortable even when I have
everything maxed out. I had a similar problem on Linux and I was able to
create a boost device to feed audio through before it went to the
speakers, could I do
On 07/10/15 13:15, Jan Stary wrote:
Please show the output of mixerctl -av
This is hardly 'maxed out'.
Same for the other settings.
Sorry about that, I'd asked in IRC about it and was given a few devices
to try, and they didn't work. I know for sure that a couple got reset at
least (I
It's worse than that: OpenBSD doesn't even support GPT, so there sre
dependencies in the way before UEFI can start. Last year there was a GSoC which
added kernel support but there's nothing in the userland.
On Tue Mar 31 15:14:18 2015 Joe Crivello josephcrive...@gmail.com wrote:
To prevent
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 05:09:44PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Unlike many OSs OpenBSD amd64 is true 64 bit operating system so even
running native i386 binaries on amd64
is not possible. IIRC there was extensive discussion many years ago
Predrag
This isn't actually what I'm interested
I know that at least in 2004 it was considered to be unreasonable to try to get
i386 linux applications working on amd64 openbsd through emul.linux, but how
much work would be involved to get amd64 linux apps working? Presumably it
wouldn't quite be as easy as just using 64 bit packages instead
Kevin Chadwick wrote:
previously on this list Nick Holland contributed:
ftp://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dmr/licenses/pricelist84.pdf
UNIX System V, Release 2.0, Source Code (1) .. $43,000.00
Each Additional CPU .. $16,000.00
And so on.. :-)
When this history comes up I
Is OpenBSD capable of booting from pure UEFI yet? This basically translates to
Is there a UEFI capable bootloader since I don't have secure boot or anything
turned on. I'm rather happy not having to deal with the bios at the moment so
having to turn legacy boot back on would be really annoying.
I've got an ext3 /home partition which I use under linux, how likely is
it that files will get clobbered if I use the same /home under a dual
boot with openbsd?
No, amd64 will only run on 64 bit x86 processors, so any 64 bit intel or
amd will work(amd made the architecture, so it's called amd64 or x86_64.)
No 32 bit processor will be able to run it
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, sc...@web.de wrote:
Hallo!
I took the subjectline from INSTALL.amd64.
I hope
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Michael H Lambert wrote:
On 12 Dec 2011, at 12:50, Tekk wrote:
No, amd64 will only run on 64 bit x86 processors, so any 64 bit intel or amd
will work(amd made the architecture, so it's called amd64 or x86_64.)
No 32 bit processor will be able to run it
For completeness
iirc the binary packages are audited, ports are not
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Neoklis Kyriazis wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Adam tho...@xteddy.org
To: Neoklis
Kyriazis n5b...@yahoo.com
Cc: OpenBSD misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Thursday,
December 8, 2011 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: Failed to
I think method I learned in irc would be better, wget just bsd.rd, boot
from that, choose upgrade and have it download via ftp/http, then upgrade
pkg_add
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Sime Ramov wrote:
I just wrote this document outlining the steps I do to keep up
with -current:
ouch, even if you don't snapshot that often it's a lot of money wasted :/
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011, Richard Toohey wrote:
On 4/12/2011, at 8:36 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 08:01:43PM +0100, Sime Ramov wrote:
I just wrote this document outlining the steps I do to keep up
with
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:09 PM, David Riley fraveyd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 1, 2011, at 2:39 PM, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:25 PM, John Tate j...@johntate.org wrote:
I'm 24 years old. I was a Linux hacker since I was 13.
So still no C++, good to know
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Tekk t...@parlementum.net wrote:
I don't think linux actually contained C++ at that point(though it does now,
much to Linus' annoyance, from the bits of the mailing list I've seen
still no C++, good to know
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Tekk t...@parlementum.net wrote:
I don't think linux actually contained C++ at that point(though it does now,
much to Linus' annoyance, from the bits of the mailing list I've seen.)
http
It's that way in the US too, afaict(C is 'deprecated')
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Dmitrij Czarkoff wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:11 PM, David Riley fraveyd...@gmail.com wrote:
one has to know C before knowing C++
Well, I don't know how it happens in US or Canada, but in Russia
ordinarily people
23 matches
Mail list logo
