syslogd is duplicating the hostname field

2015-08-17 Thread dan (ddp)
I just noticed that syslogd is adding a hostname to the syslog
messages it receives, whether there is one present or not. I'm
probably missing the option, but is there a way to turn this off?

Example:
Aug 13 19:17:01 dhcp.1.158.example.com beaglebone CRON[5529]:
pam_unix(cron:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)

I'm fine with either dhcp.1.158.example.com or beaglebone being
written to the log, but not both. I can probably configure some
clients to not send a hostname when forwarding events, but not all of
my clients are configurable.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

rc.conf.local:
syslogd_flags=${syslogd_flags} -u -a /var/unbound/dev/log



OpenBSD 5.8 (GENERIC.MP) #1235: Mon Aug 10 06:54:34 MDT 2015
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 2120847360 (2022MB)
avail mem = 2052739072 (1957MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.6 @ 0x7f79c000 (62 entries)
bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version 1.2.1 date 01/28/2010
bios0: Dell Inc. PowerEdge T110
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
acpi0: sleep states S0 S4 S5
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC SPCR HPET DM__ MCFG WD__ SLIC ERST HEST
BERT EINJ TCPA SSDT
acpi0: wakeup devices PCI0(S5) USBA(S0) USBB(S0)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1101 @ 2.27GHz, 2261.26 MHz
cpu0: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,POPCNT,NXE,LONG,LAHF,PERF,ITSC,SENSOR,ARAT
cpu0: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0
mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 8 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges
cpu0: apic clock running at 132MHz
cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, C-substates=0.2.1.1, IBE
cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 4 (application processor)
cpu1: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1101 @ 2.27GHz, 2260.99 MHz
cpu1: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,POPCNT,NXE,LONG,LAHF,PERF,ITSC,SENSOR,ARAT
cpu1: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache
cpu1: smt 0, core 2, package 0
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 0 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (LYD0)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus -1 (LYD2)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (HVD0)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (HVD2)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 2 (PEX0)
acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 3 (PEX4)
acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 4 (PEX5)
acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus 5 (COMP)
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3(350@96 mwait.1@0x20), C2(500@64 mwait.1@0x10),
C1(1000@1 mwait.1)
acpicpu1 at acpi0: C3(350@96 mwait.1@0x20), C2(500@64 mwait.1@0x10),
C1(1000@1 mwait.1)
ipmi at mainbus0 not configured
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel Core Host rev 0x12
ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel 3400 USB rev 0x05: apic 0 int 22
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 3400 PCIE rev 0x05: msi
pci1 at ppb0 bus 2
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 4 Intel 3400 PCIE rev 0x05
pci2 at ppb1 bus 3
bge0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM5722 rev 0x00, BCM5755 C0
(0xa200): msi, address b8:ac:6f:7d:d2:e0
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5722 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 Intel 3400 PCIE rev 0x05: msi
pci3 at ppb2 bus 4
ehci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 3400 USB rev 0x05: apic 0 int 22
usb1 at ehci1: USB revision 2.0
uhub1 at usb1 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI rev 0xa5
pci4 at ppb3 bus 5
vga1 at pci4 dev 3 function 0 Matrox MGA G200eW rev 0x0a
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
pcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 3420 LPC rev 0x05
ahci0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 3400 AHCI rev 0x05: msi, AHCI 1.3
ahci0: port 0: 3.0Gb/s
ahci0: port 1: 3.0Gb/s
ahci0: port 4: 1.5Gb/s
scsibus1 at ahci0: 32 targets
sd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: ATA, WDC WD10EADS-00L, 01.0 SCSI3
0/direct fixed naa.50014ee1ac95dac9
sd0: 953869MB, 512 bytes/sector, 1953525168 sectors
sd1 at scsibus1 targ 1 lun 0: ATA, SAMSUNG HD103SJ, 1AJ1 SCSI3
0/direct fixed naa.50024e900404611c
sd1: 953869MB, 512 bytes/sector, 1953525168 sectors
cd0 at scsibus1 targ 4 lun 0: PLDS, DVD-ROM DH-16D5S, VD15 ATAPI
5/cdrom removable
isa0 at pcib0
isadma0 at isa0
com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
ahci0 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 3400 AHCI rev 0x05: msi, AHCI 1.3
ahci0: port 0: 3.0Gb/s
ahci0: port 1: 3.0Gb/s
ahci0: port 4: 1.5Gb/s
scsibus1 at ahci0: 32 targets
sd0 at scsibus1 targ 0 lun 0: ATA, WDC WD10EADS-00L, 01.0 SCSI3

smtpd rejecting users

2009-10-26 Thread ddp
I'm feeling stupid at the moment, and I'm sure someone will show my why shortly.
This is using the latest source in cvs for smtpd (updated today).
I've setup smtpd by the man page, and configured the following config:

listen on lo0
listen on re0
map aliases { source db /etc/mail/aliases.db }
map virtual { source db /etc/mail/vmap.db }
accept for local deliver to mbox
accept from 192.168.1.0/24 for domain example.com  deliver to mbox
accept from 192.168.1.0/24 for virtual virtual deliver to mbox

Mail going to u...@ix.example.com (the mailserver) works just fine, but
mail going to u...@example.com gets rejected with a 530:

smtp_dispatch_mfa: mfa handled return path
session error: IPv6:::1: 530 Recipient rejected
session_destroy: killing client: 0x204cdf000

Here is the virtual file:
# more vmap
@example.comix.example.com
u...@example.com user

I have tried it without the virtual file (removing the appropriate
lines from the conf)
and setting the hostname to just example.com.

Any hints? Thanks in advance.

dmesg:
OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #231: Mon Oct 19 21:50:55 MDT 2009
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 2135113728 (2036MB)
avail mem = 2073899008 (1977MB)
RTC BIOS diagnostic error 80clock_battery
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xe3590 (23 entries)
bios0: vendor Intel Corp. version LF94510J.86A.0171.2009.0403.0118
date 04/03/2009
bios0: Intel Corporation D945GCLF2D
acpi0 at bios0: rev 0
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC WDDT MCFG ASF! HPET
acpi0: wakeup devices SLPB(S4) P32_(S4) UAR1(S4) UAR2(S4) PEX0(S4)
PEX1(S4) PEX2(S4) PEX3(S4) PEX4(S4) PEX5(S4) UHC1(S3) UHC2(S3)
UHC3(S3) UHC4(S3) EHCI(S3) AC9M(S4) AZAL(S4)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz, 1596.25 MHz
cpu0: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,TM2,CX16,xTPR,NXE,LONG
cpu0: 512KB 64b/line 16-way L2 cache
cpu0: apic clock running at 133MHz
cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
cpu1: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz, 1596.01 MHz
cpu1: 
FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,TM2,CX16,xTPR,NXE,LONG
cpu1: 512KB 64b/line 16-way L2 cache
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 2
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 4 (P32_)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 1 (PEX0)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEX1)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 2 (PEX2)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 3 (PEX3)
acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEX4)
acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEX5)
acpicpu0 at acpi0
acpicpu1 at acpi0
acpibtn0 at acpi0: SLPB
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82945G Host rev 0x02
vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel 82945G Video rev 0x02
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
intagp0 at vga1
agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0x8000, size 0x1000
inteldrm0 at vga1: apic 2 int 16 (irq 11)
drm0 at inteldrm0
azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 Intel 82801GB HD Audio rev 0x01:
apic 2 int 22 (irq 9)
azalia0: codecs: Realtek ALC662
audio0 at azalia0
ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01: apic 2
int 17 (irq 255)
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
re0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Realtek 8168 rev 0x02: RTL8168C/8111C
(0x3c00), apic 2 int 16 (irq 11), address 00:1c:c0:d5:c7:f1
rgephy0 at re0 phy 7: RTL8169S/8110S PHY, rev. 2
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 2 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01: apic 2
int 18 (irq 255)
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 3 Intel 82801GB PCIE rev 0x01: apic 2
int 19 (irq 255)
pci3 at ppb2 bus 3
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: apic 2
int 23 (irq 10)
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: apic 2
int 19 (irq 11)
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: apic 2
int 18 (irq 9)
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: apic 2
int 16 (irq 11)
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801GB USB rev 0x01: apic 2
int 23 (irq 10)
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI rev 0xe1
pci4 at ppb3 bus 4
ohci0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 NEC USB rev 0x43: apic 2 int 21 (irq
10), version 1.0
ohci1 at pci4 dev 0 function 1 NEC USB rev 0x43: apic 2 int 22 (irq
9), version 1.0
ehci1 at pci4 dev 0 function 2 NEC USB rev 0x04: apic 2 int 23 (irq 10)
usb1 at ehci1: USB revision 2.0
uhub1 at usb1 NEC EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
pciide0 at pci4 dev 0 function 3 CMD Technology SiI3512 SATA rev 0x01: DMA
pciide0: using apic 2 int 21 (irq 10) for native-PCI interrupt
usb2 at ohci0: 

Re: smtpd rejecting users

2009-10-26 Thread ddp
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Robert info...@die-optimisten.net wrote:
 I don't have an answer to this, but I would like to add that I have the same
 problem with aliases (no vmap in use):

 If i have an entry like aliasuser: realuser in the aliases file, then any
 email to aliasuser will be rejected with 530; only real users are
 accepted as recipients.

 It seems to me that SMTPD is not resolving the usernames.

 regards,
 Robert


I managed to get it to work, but I haven't had a chance to figure out
exactly how.
If you're interested, I can try to figure it out and post back later.
dan



Re: smtpd rejecting users

2009-10-26 Thread ddp
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Gilles Chehade gil...@openbsd.org wrote:

 It looks like you are initiating the session from localhost, but your
 ruleset only allows deliveries to example.com and your virtual domains
 if they are initiated from 192.168.1.0/24 , you may want to add the
 following:

accept for domain example.com deliver to mbox
accept for virtual virtual deliver to mbox

 also, you should really have:

accept for all relay

 otherwise local users will not be able to send outgoing mails (and
 this includes smtpd trying to send an outgoing bounce)

 Let me know if it fixes your issue

 Gilles


 --
 Gilles Chehade
 freelance developer/sysadmin/consultant

   http://www.poolp.org



Thanks for the response. I'll modify the ruleset to take into account the
localhost, and put the relay rule back in.
dan



Re: supported Ethernet alternatives on the EEE PC?

2008-01-30 Thread ddp
On Jan 30, 2008 11:31 AM, James Hartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Discussion found in the archives indicated that the Ethernet port
 found on the EEE PC was not supported in OpenBSD yet.  Has anyone had
 luck with any USB NIC?

 Thanks.



I just tried a new Linksys USB200M (axe(4)) adapter and it worked fine.



Re: my harddrive or latest snapshots problem?

2006-10-19 Thread ddp
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=116079153502388w=2

On 10/19/06, Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,
 I've installed the latest snapshots from the 18.10.2006.
 I updated my rather old sources via cvs and had lots of the following
 output:
 bdwrite: force async write on the buffer 0xd8003f20
 bdwrite: force async write on the buffer 0xd8003f20
 bdwrite: force async write on the buffer 0xd801f0a4
 bdwrite: force async write on the buffer 0xd801f218
 bdwrite: force async write on the buffer 0xd8003f20
 bdwrite: force async write on the buffer 0xd8003f20
 bdwrite: force async write on the buffer 0xd8003f20
 bdwrite: force async write on the buffer 0xd7ff9804

 Does that mean I may have a hd problem and should care about a new one ?
 or
 May this problem be related to the latest snapshot?

 Thank you
 Didier



Re: Setting Up A Wireless and Wired Network

2006-09-20 Thread ddp
On 9/20/06, stupidmail4me [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I want to create a single network, 192.168.1.0/24. I
 want to be able to access it either from a wired
 connection on xl0 or a wireless connection on ral0. I
 am using dhcpd.

 What's the best way to set this up? I want one single
 network. My thoughts:
 xl0 - 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0
 ral0 - 192.168.1.2/255.255.255.0
 dhcpd - listening on both xl0 and ral0

 This would create a problem though, because the
 routing tables would be all screwed up. I would have
 to also create a bridge between the two, correct? So:
 bridgename.bridge0 - add xl0 add ral0 up.

 Is this the best way to do it. I essentially want one
 network available on both cards, so wired or wireless,
 to be transparent.

 TIA.

 -James
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
 http://mail.yahoo.com


Check out trunk(4).  I believe it gives an example pretty darn close to
this.



Re: Bug in egrep?

2006-09-07 Thread ddp
On 9/7/06, Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, AndrC)s wrote:

  egrep shouldn't find anything, you are searching for the string  in
  some text here, clearly, it isn't there.

 Nah, an empty search pattern should match any line, as defined by SU
 and the man page. The only problem is if the -x option takes
 precendence or not. SU does not say a word about that.

 If anybody has access to a Solaris machine, I like to know what the
 test does there.

 -Otto


 The following option is  supported  for  /usr/xpg4/bin/egrep
 only:

 -xConsider only input lines that use all  characters  in
   the  line  to  match an entire fixed string or regular
   expression to be matching lines.

$ alias egrep=/usr/xpg4/bin/egrep
$ echo some text here | egrep -x  ; echo $status

$

SunOS 5.9.

ddp



Re: Some questions related to 4.0

2006-09-05 Thread ddp
On 9/5/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Hello everybody,

 I`ve some questions related to the upcomming 4.0 Release.

 I`ve read that SpeedStep was deactivated for SMP.
 Could somebody explain me why this was done?


http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=115635621902871
According to that message, setperf isn't currently SMP safe.



Re: Can't compile X11R6.9.0 on OpenBSD 4.0 (sparc64)

2006-08-29 Thread ddp
On 8/29/06, Gary B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It seems the install of X11R6.9.0 on OpenBSD 4.0 doesn't include the
 sunffb driver, which I'm
 trying to use to get the Creator 3D card working with X.  I pulled
 down the source from xorg,
 but I'm running into a problem getting the error message
 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lresolv

 I see that the libresolv library has been removed from OBSD3.9, so I'm
 not really sure how I
 can get X11R6.9.0 to compile.  Also, maybe I'm just blind, but I don't
 see X11R6 in the ports
 either, so I'm at a loss of what to do for the sunffb driver.

 Any ideas / suggestions would be appreciated.  Also note that the
 on-board ATI graphics card
 isn't an option (it's a Sun Ultra 10, btw), as it doesn't support a
 high enough graphics
 resolution.

 You could try installing the x*.tgz install sets.  It's not in ports.
Unfortunately this may apply (from http://www.openbsd.org/sparc64.html):

It is possible to use X in frame buffer mode with all supported SBus cards,


as well as the on-board ATI graphics or the UPA Creator, Creator 3D or Elite


3D at the boot resolution/depth using the wsfb(4) driver.


ddp



Re: compiling problems `-Wstack-larger-than-2047'

2006-08-21 Thread ddp
On 8/21/06, Marcos Marconcini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 cc1: error: unrecognized option `-Wstack-larger-than-2047'

 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC (line 715 of Makefile).


 You didn't follow the guide:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20060727



Re: suspended zaurus doesn't wake up (-CURRENT)

2006-06-14 Thread ddp
On 6/13/06, Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,

 when suspending the zaurus using a -CURRENT kernel or the latest
 snapshot (from june, 8th), it isn't possible to wake up the system.

 This happens both with power supply connected and with battery only,
 as well as with pressing the on/off button or invoking zzz(8).

 With a kernel from may, 19th still works.

 Could anyone please test and confirm this problem using a snapshot?

 Ciao,
 Kili



It works most of the time for me using a 3000 and the June 8th snapshot.  I
am running apmd -H with a setperf of 50.  Running apmd in cool running
mode seemed to be worse, it wouldn't wake up as often.



Re: suspended zaurus doesn't wake up (-CURRENT)

2006-06-14 Thread ddp
Just a quick update:  The newest shapshot (June 13) seems to work better.
zzz doesn't work properly, but using the power button to suspend has worked
fine for me so far.



Re: more 1 than client can use same port from router (for bittorrent)

2005-08-06 Thread ddp
On 8/6/05, Vivek Ayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi guys,
 
 I was wondering if it was possible to port forward the same port to
 more than one client behind a router. Currently, my client is the only
 one using bittorrent behind the router. I have this in /etc/pf.conf:
 
 rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp to port 6881:6889 - 192.168.0.3 port 6881:6889
 
 What do I do if other people on the subnet wanted to use the same
 ports (6881:6889) to use bittorrent (clients other than 192.168.0.3)?
 Thanks.
 
 Vivek
 
 

I think some better bittorrent applications allow you to configure the
ports you want to use.  Have them use a different range.

ddp



Re: syslogd udp port

2005-08-05 Thread ddp
On 8/5/05, poncenby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 if you think about what you said...
 
 in the long run it's usually faster to do research
 
 just doesn't make sense. i wanted an answer within a day, didn't have
 time to read the man pages so posted a question to misc and got an
 answer (within a day). f*%k the long run, what exactly is the long run
 anyway.
 

It doesn't take a day to read the man pages, usualy just a couple of
minutes.  It's easier, and nicer to the people reading the list. :)

ddp



Re: amd64 4gb memory won't boot

2005-05-19 Thread ddp
On 5/19/05, Need Coffee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've been searching but can't find anything concrete... amd64.html
 and the FAQ's amd64 section do not mention any problems, so I'm
 asking here.  (I found little bits here and there about this problem
 affecting a lot of freenixes but nothing tangible.  Apologies if I've
 missed something major...)
 
 Trying to boot a sun v40z with 4GB RAM fails with OpenBSD/amd64
 3.6 and 3.7-current from yesterday.  i386 3.7-current works.
 
 (begin snippet from amd64 3.7-current from yesterday)
 
  OpenBSD/amd64 PXEBOOT 1.06
 booting tftp:bsd.rd: 1468848+300494+2137464+0+469256 
 [80+156528+90879]=0x8692c8
 entry point at 0x1001e0 [7205c766, 3404, 24448612, 68a0a304]
 WARNING: CAN'T ALLOCATE EXTENDED MEMORY FROM IOMEM EXTENT MAP!
 skipping 3824615424 bytes of memory above 4GB
 panic: init_x86_64: can't find end of memory
 
 The operating system has halted.
 Please press any key to reboot.
 
 (end snippet)
 
 Removing all but 4GB of memory allows the system to boot without
 issue.
 
 So, the inevitable question:  is there any workaround or fix in
 development that I may test?  I would happily do so.  Should I
 sendbug(1) this?  My guess is that this is already well known to
 everyone except me...
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 

If I understand and remember things correctly, the boot code is still 32bit.