Re: amd64/SHA256.sig: 404 Not Found

2021-10-11 Thread jpeg bild
On Sat Oct 9, 2021 at 11:43 AM CST, franci...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> just trying to sysupgrade as usual, but I get the 404 on amd/SHA256.sig
> test with url from https://man.openbsd.org/installurl.5 doesn't improve
> the situation.
>
> # sysupgrade
> Fetching from https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.1/amd64/
> sysupgrade: Error retrieving
> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.1/amd64/SHA256.sig: 404 Not Found
>
> Any help is appreciated, Thanks in advance!
> francis

we are in pre-release, so the upgrade mechanism thinks you are using a
release and want to upgrade to the next release (7.0 -> 7.1), which 
does not exist so you get a 404. use sysupgrade -s or wait for 7.0
to come out



Re: Love OpenBSD Humor

2021-09-20 Thread jpeg bild
On Sun Sep 19, 2021 at 5:59 PM CST, flint pyrite wrote:
> that those who have a voice
>
> typically speak.
>
> What they speak is a mystery:
>
> binary means 0 or 1
> 0 = truth
> 1= lie
>
> 
>
> this is binary choose a state of 0 or 1
> Yesterday I posted in OpenBSD my fav OS:
> 0 means mindlessness
>
> 1 means mindfulness
>
> My entire post was deleted. Sorry for the hints
>
> So much for humor today
>
> ---
> I do not speak much. I tried to post this on Reddit and it got deleted.
> I thought it was funny so I reposted. Finally, I posted on here.
>
> Coding is great: 0 : or





Re: Can I do 4-26 snapshot to 6.9-stable safely?

2021-05-02 Thread jpeg bild
I mean use the usb stick for the files mormozoid. boot using bsd.rd and
at the "upgrade" prompt instead of selecting http mount your drive and
select "disk" and type in the location of the mount
On Sun May 2, 2021 at 12:34 PM CST, Luke Small wrote:
> There has to be a valid partition to install it to. When I have an
> encrypted drive, that doesn’t exist using usb…chudazoid.
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 1:31 PM jpeg bild  wrote:
>
> > No you don't chudazoid, you just select your usb disk with the file sets
> > after selecting "disk" as your file location
> >
> > On Sat May 1, 2021 at 7:37 PM CST, Luke Small wrote:
> > > I would do that, but I’ll have to figure out how to manually mount my
> > > encrypted partition, which sysupgrade and bsd.rd takes care if for me
> > > automatically.
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 8:07 PM jpeg bild  wrote:
> > >
> > > > Use the fastly mirror, or download the files to a usb stick and select
> > > > "disk" at the prompt. once you go current you can't go back, and its
> > > > very clearly said in the FAQ as ashton said
> > > >
> > > > On Sat May 1, 2021 at 6:25 PM CST, Luke Small wrote:
> > > > > I tried that by the way. I even mv’ed my pf.conf to nullify it and
> > > > > tried
> > > > > and it couldn’t download from the gigenet mirror which absolutely has
> > > > > the
> > > > > 6.9 files. It didn’t work at all. Sysupgrade really needs to be able
> > > > > to be
> > > > > working on versions as well as -r and -s! The program isn’t
> > > > > intelligent
> > > > > enough.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 5:26 PM jpeg bild 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > If you want to move back to stable, you would have to boot bsd.rd
> > and
> > > > > > select "Upgrade" in the prompt, then install from http with the
> > correct
> > > > > > path for 6.9-stable
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri Apr 30, 2021 at 9:49 PM CST, Luke Small wrote:
> > > > > > > We’re there major irreversible changes made to the following
> > > > snapshot:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > kern.version=OpenBSD 6.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #479: Mon Apr 26
> > > > 02:26:53
> > > > > > > MDT
> > > > > > > 2021
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > which would render in incapable of a downgrade?
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > -Luke
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > -Luke
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > -Luke
> >
> > --
> -Luke



Re: Can I do 4-26 snapshot to 6.9-stable safely?

2021-05-02 Thread jpeg bild
No you don't chudazoid, you just select your usb disk with the file sets
after selecting "disk" as your file location

On Sat May 1, 2021 at 7:37 PM CST, Luke Small wrote:
> I would do that, but I’ll have to figure out how to manually mount my
> encrypted partition, which sysupgrade and bsd.rd takes care if for me
> automatically.
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 8:07 PM jpeg bild  wrote:
>
> > Use the fastly mirror, or download the files to a usb stick and select
> > "disk" at the prompt. once you go current you can't go back, and its
> > very clearly said in the FAQ as ashton said
> >
> > On Sat May 1, 2021 at 6:25 PM CST, Luke Small wrote:
> > > I tried that by the way. I even mv’ed my pf.conf to nullify it and
> > > tried
> > > and it couldn’t download from the gigenet mirror which absolutely has
> > > the
> > > 6.9 files. It didn’t work at all. Sysupgrade really needs to be able
> > > to be
> > > working on versions as well as -r and -s! The program isn’t
> > > intelligent
> > > enough.
> > >
> > > On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 5:26 PM jpeg bild  wrote:
> > >
> > > > If you want to move back to stable, you would have to boot bsd.rd and
> > > > select "Upgrade" in the prompt, then install from http with the correct
> > > > path for 6.9-stable
> > > >
> > > > On Fri Apr 30, 2021 at 9:49 PM CST, Luke Small wrote:
> > > > > We’re there major irreversible changes made to the following
> > snapshot:
> > > > >
> > > > > kern.version=OpenBSD 6.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #479: Mon Apr 26
> > 02:26:53
> > > > > MDT
> > > > > 2021
> > > > >
> > > > > which would render in incapable of a downgrade?
> > > > > --
> > > > > -Luke
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > -Luke
> >
> > --
> -Luke



Re: Can I do 4-26 snapshot to 6.9-stable safely?

2021-05-01 Thread jpeg bild
Use the fastly mirror, or download the files to a usb stick and select
"disk" at the prompt. once you go current you can't go back, and its
very clearly said in the FAQ as ashton said

On Sat May 1, 2021 at 6:25 PM CST, Luke Small wrote:
> I tried that by the way. I even mv’ed my pf.conf to nullify it and
> tried
> and it couldn’t download from the gigenet mirror which absolutely has
> the
> 6.9 files. It didn’t work at all. Sysupgrade really needs to be able
> to be
> working on versions as well as -r and -s! The program isn’t
> intelligent
> enough.
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 5:26 PM jpeg bild  wrote:
>
> > If you want to move back to stable, you would have to boot bsd.rd and
> > select "Upgrade" in the prompt, then install from http with the correct
> > path for 6.9-stable
> >
> > On Fri Apr 30, 2021 at 9:49 PM CST, Luke Small wrote:
> > > We’re there major irreversible changes made to the following snapshot:
> > >
> > > kern.version=OpenBSD 6.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #479: Mon Apr 26 02:26:53
> > > MDT
> > > 2021
> > >
> > > which would render in incapable of a downgrade?
> > > --
> > > -Luke
> >
> > --
> -Luke



Re: Can I do 4-26 snapshot to 6.9-stable safely?

2021-05-01 Thread jpeg bild
worked fine for me, its basically just reinstalling but with the same 
configuration as your last install
On Sat May 1, 2021 at 6:42 PM CST, Ashton Fagg wrote:
>
> > On May 1, 2021, at 18:38, jpeg bild  wrote:
> > 
> > If you want to move back to stable, you would have to boot bsd.rd and
> > select "Upgrade" in the prompt, then install from http with the correct
> > path for 6.9-stable
>
> …except that’s not supported.
>
> Again, per the very first sentence:
>
> https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade69.html



Re: Can I do 4-26 snapshot to 6.9-stable safely?

2021-05-01 Thread jpeg bild
If you want to move back to stable, you would have to boot bsd.rd and
select "Upgrade" in the prompt, then install from http with the correct
path for 6.9-stable

On Fri Apr 30, 2021 at 9:49 PM CST, Luke Small wrote:
> We’re there major irreversible changes made to the following snapshot:
>
> kern.version=OpenBSD 6.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #479: Mon Apr 26 02:26:53
> MDT
> 2021
>
> which would render in incapable of a downgrade?
> --
> -Luke



Re: Cultural underground legende Seymour Cray and his legacy

2021-04-22 Thread jpeg bild
On Thu Apr 22, 2021 at 12:00 PM CST, Balder Oddson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 12:28:28AM +0200, Balder Oddson wrote:
> > Whereof everyone is interested,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > A few things about his architecture is extraordinary special.
> > 
> > #1 ideal properties, can never be done better for some things.
> > #1.1 analogue, you need ground and good drain, to do work during weak force 
> > pull.
> > #1.2 physical, independent IC's, relying on physics for syncronization.
> > #1.2.1 allowing digital global sync between die slots, async, but local
> > sync with global clock.
> > #1.3 as a turing machine, everything is virtually represented with
> > arrays of addresesses in cintinous memory.
> > #1.3.1 You get scalar operations on your vectors with SIMD insutrctions.
> > #1.3.2 Remotely scatter data in remote memory, that is gathered into
> > another continous area of memory with addresses to data.
> > 
> > 
> > On the one hand, where this gives 8x the performance at a high price, it
> > likely caused as much awe, inspiration and anxiety in the finance sector
> > where Cray got the funding to research, build and sell these beasts.
> > 
> > The Cult of the Holy Cow, and The Cult of the Dead Cow are oxymorons if
> > the contexts abd historic circumstances are to be considered.
> > 
> > Using hex numbers, would ideally imply an understanding of the Cray
> > architecture, and why it perhaps now can be be software defined.
> > 
>
> The puns where uninviting, and didn't inspire snide remarks and comments
> that weren't drivel without content and context.
>
> Thereof interests in logic has invited investigations of tautologies as
> a concept in logic, whereof one cannt speak and merely add drivel.
>
> Not sure if it's true entirely, but for the orginal Cray's, first an
> engineer came to try and get it to work, if not, Seymour gave it a try
> before shipping a replacement. Likely because he tortured the
> electromechanical properties around the central part so much that it was
> touchy feely.
>
> Anyone intelligeble around this topic likely have passing interest for
> having a gray beard and being sick and tiered of "what did cray do",
> "what if he set a more reasonable goal than 10x the closest competitor".
>
>
> Ciao,
> Balder
you're just schizoposting now



Re: Cultural underground legende Seymour Cray and his legacy

2021-04-22 Thread jpeg bild
On Thu Apr 22, 2021 at 11:32 AM CST,  wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:26:00AM -0600, jpeg bild wrote:
> >> Your postings are the result of recent secret MKULTRA experiments.
> >good to know the cia runs pysops in mailinglists too
> >gangstalking is confirmed real
>
> According to recently declassified CIA documents, most gangstalking
> perpetrators don't know they're doing it because they're being
> mind-controlled by the MKULTRA satellites. Now that you know, please
> stop gangstalking us.
look behind you pal



Re: Cultural underground legende Seymour Cray and his legacy

2021-04-22 Thread jpeg bild
On Thu Apr 22, 2021 at 8:27 AM CST, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Balder Oddson [ola...@gmail.com] wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:24:32AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > Is this a new UMF experiment ?
> > 
> > Does it involve integrating this on a chip? Not sure if past successes
> > are that great.
> > 
>
> Your postings are the result of recent secret MKULTRA experiments.
good to know the cia runs pysops in mailinglists too
gangstalking is confirmed real