Damien Miller skrev 2010-10-30 02.14:
Hi,
Can anyone recommend a small, fanless computer that will accept a HD (perhaps
a 2.5 drive) that uses ECC RAM? Needless to say, it must run OpenBSD.
Being 64 bit, having accellerated crypto and/or supporting multiple drives
would be bonus points, but
a bit longer answer: smtpd is interfaced to bsdauth (see
authenticate(3)). so if you want you can implement authentication
method, just like I did to authenticate smtpd client to pop3 server.
authenticate(3) makes my head spin, it would be awesome if you shared
how you did that! Has anybody
On 2009-10-01 14:39, Toni Mueller wrote:
I didn't check whether the stale file gets removed, but thought about
using a different source instead. If spamd(8) could use RBLs in
addition to static tables, that would ease the problem, too.
The concept of RBLs aren't in line with the idea that
Jan Johansson skrev:
Hello.
On my laptop I use trunk(4) failover to switch between wired and
wireless networks. It works great. But I think my solution for
the router is a bit dirty. Is there a better way?
The router has one interface connected to the internet (fxp0)
and two interfaces for the
Jan Johansson skrev:
kami petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, it should work. however, you should set an address on either of
the interfaces that constitutes the bridge, not the bridge itself.
but you don't say exactly where you are unsuccessful...
It works, I just thought there might
It sounds scary,specially for those of us who do not understand too much
about computers, I basically wanted to know if there is any truth in all
this or it just another persorn trying to sell his product well by
undermining others.
say hello to the archives.
...
wd0(pciide0:0:0): timeout
type: ata
c_bcount: 512
c_skip: 0
wd0e: DMA error writing fsbn 2651200 of 2651200-2651211 (wd0 bn 3819472; cn
3789 tn 2 sn 34), retrying
wd0: soft error (corrected)
wd0(pciide0:0:0): timeout
type: ata
c_bcount: 0
Paul Barbeau skrev:
I am trying to move from the base install from the CD/FTP to either
stable or current. I get the same error regardless of what version I
try with and regardless of what machine (different components inside).
Below is the steps I am doing to rebuild the kernel and the error I
J.C. Roberts skrev:
Can anyone confirm or deny if XF4-STABLE is broken? I've updated source
twice and have had two failed builds of X while following FAQ5.
can you confirm that you actually have XF4-STABLE? a *clean* checkout
usually cures a non-compiling tree.
/kami
Dave Feustel wrote:
It looks like there may still be a few security holes to be
dealt with.
no, they are called backdoors, through which all who are sick of you
play their dirty tricks.
I've started running apache webserver. My web address
(until the next power failure) is 71.97.182.5.
Dave Diller skrev:
The main reason RAIDframe is not in GENERIC, I seem to recall, is that
it makes the kernel quite a bit bigger for no gain in the average case.
Yeah, 20% or so, with RAIDframe being the only change:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5281094 Sep 16 21:30 bsd-stock-3.8-install
Spruell, Darren-Perot skrev:
From: Joachim Schipper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our situation is that we have a user account that multiple
people have
access to log into to retrieve files. Each user
authenticates to that
account with their own SSH key. Current log entry shows:
Jan 24
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 1/2/06, Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've made it very clear that CGD won't be imported into OpenBSD, yet
you've never explained why, or why you ported it in the first place.
Care to let us in on why? I expect your reply will be a short no just
like a few of
pci bus around ~1 Gbit/s? so, assuming the system is dedicated
to routing, why would a theoretical maximum of ~0.4 Gbit/s be so hard to
handle, especially as most of it should stay on the internal pci bus of
the nic?
kindly
kami petersen
,
kami petersen
Markus Wernig skrev:
I have a system (obsd3.8/sparc64) with 2 identical scsi drives (4
partitions + 1 swap each). The largest partition (10G) is mirrored over
the 2 drives as a ccd with interleave factor 16.
And 1.2M/s is rather less that what I'd have expected, is this figure
really the
documented.
it seems trivial to set up, but what kind of functionality can be
expected as a disk fails?
will the system continue working?
how is failure reported?
what is the procedure to replace the disk and rebuild a mirrored ccd? - dd?
/kami petersen
frantisek holop skrev:
(what's the deal?)
stop whining and write it yourself ;)
/kami
Uwe Dippel skrev:
For some this might be boring, but for others encouraging:
Box off-shelf as above boots properly with cd37.iso
Broadcom NC7761 Gigabit Server Adapter is recognized
LSI 53c1030 Duplex U320 is recognized
The 146 GB 15k drive is recognized
I'll come back later as usual when the
what are the chances of getting multiple dynamic ip's assigned to one
dhclient interface, as can be done with aliases for static ip's?
there's an alias specification in dhclient.conf(5) but it's not really
clear whether you would be able to use it to get more than one dynamic
ip (assuming
What would be the best way to use OpenBSD on these systems?
obviously you need to get other controllers
(http://openbsd.org/i386.html). then offer to donate the surplus cards
to the developers, and maybe someone will do some work on it, i.e.
porting it from freebsd.
/kami
Did you miss the line If someone has physical access to my OpenBSD
box? With physical access, all of your suggestions are easily bypassed
with a bios reset.
as you are sure you know, that, along with matt's tip, is about as
reasonable advice you can get if you can't physically secure your
Dave Feustel skrev:
On Saturday 27 August 2005 09:08, kami petersen wrote:
Did you miss the line If someone has physical access to my OpenBSD
box? With physical access, all of your suggestions are easily bypassed
with a bios reset.
as you are sure you know, that, along
Antoine Jacoutot skrev:
How can I make sensorsd or syslog to mail me this, without running a
parser every minute on /var/log/messages which looks overkill.
man 5 sensorsd.conf
/kami
Fridtjof Busse skrev:
Hi
Since I didn't get any reply to my initial question, I'll try to be a
bit more specific:
I've got a machine with three interfaces: One is my SDSL-link and the
other two are internal. One of the internal interfaces is wired, the
other one wireless, using OpenVPN (i.e.
null and union mounts have been deleted.
cool. why?
Mario Lopez skrev:
I'm sorry I didn't mention it earlier, we use NetQMAIL + VPOPMAIL +
mysql centralized auth.
with this kind of setup you should be able to get insane availability
figures using standard tricks like ups, quality hardware (no ata),
conservative time-proven settings, raid... (i
but when it comes to the mail
repository, as far as i know maildir storage is *not* the choice for
replication.
Why?
Or are you implying that mbox storage is?
no
Or that neither is?
neither, it's not a problem with maildir, it's a general problem of
maintaining files synchronized.
Basis for
28 matches
Mail list logo
