Re: Requested upstream patch to use OpenBSD's malloc
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:09:09PM -0700, Andrew Fresh wrote: > I opened a ticket with upstream to use OpenBSD's malloc by default. > > https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=122000 You will be happy to know this was merged to bleed today. http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/9be9e8a734382a4f2852efc22debe8e98e91eee9 Many thanks to Tony Cook and all the people who put in a good word. l8rZ, -- andrew - http://afresh1.com Instructions are just another man's opinion of how to do something. -- Weldboy #DPWisdom
Re: Requested upstream patch to use OpenBSD's malloc
Done and done. Just a heads-up if you try to comment on the issue and encounter a page with no content, it’s because you’re not logged in. - Eric On May 31, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Andrew Fresh wrote: > I opened a ticket with upstream to use OpenBSD's malloc by default. > > https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=122000 > > Perl was setup to use perl's malloc on OpenBSD by default in 2010. > > https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=75742 > > > The perl in OpenBSD base has always used OpenBSD's malloc, and I believe > that is what OpenBSD users will expect, even building perl themselves. > > If you have opinions that may sway the perl5-porters, please chime in on > the above ticket #122000. > > l8rZ, > -- > andrew - http://afresh1.com > > People who invent random theories which only defend the vendor must have > been beaten as children. Beaten with sticks. > At least, that's my theory. > -- Theo De Raadt
Re: Requested upstream patch to use OpenBSD's malloc
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 07:11:37PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:09:09PM -0700, Andrew Fresh wrote: > > > I opened a ticket with upstream to use OpenBSD's malloc by default. > > > > https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=122000 > > > > Perl was setup to use perl's malloc on OpenBSD by default in 2010. > > > > https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=75742 > > > > > > The perl in OpenBSD base has always used OpenBSD's malloc, and I believe > > that is what OpenBSD users will expect, even building perl themselves. > > > > If you have opinions that may sway the perl5-porters, please chime in on > > the above ticket #122000. > > It's a bit say they never reacted to my comments in bug 75742. > Good you are taking action, Actually, the code of perl is slightly annoying, because it doesn't have any emergency memory reserve unless you're using their own malloc... This is something I've wanted to look at, but haven't had the time to do. It means having a bit of leeway when you run out of memory... Might come in handy in order to let pkg_add clean up a wee little bit before crashing...
Re: Requested upstream patch to use OpenBSD's malloc
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:09:09PM -0700, Andrew Fresh wrote: > I opened a ticket with upstream to use OpenBSD's malloc by default. > > https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=122000 > > Perl was setup to use perl's malloc on OpenBSD by default in 2010. > > https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=75742 > > > The perl in OpenBSD base has always used OpenBSD's malloc, and I believe > that is what OpenBSD users will expect, even building perl themselves. > > If you have opinions that may sway the perl5-porters, please chime in on > the above ticket #122000. It's a bit say they never reacted to my comments in bug 75742. Good you are taking action, -Otto