Re: bridge(4) Problems when running under ESXi ?

2020-11-30 Thread Tom Smyth
Hello Heinrich, as another hack you can setup virtual switches (separate ones for any given link between two VMs ) eg vm1--vswitch2---vm2---vswitch3--vm4 so if you have promiscuous enabled and you only have two vms attached to the vswitch is not so bad... but if you have 100x vms on a port with

Re: bridge(4) Problems when running under ESXi ?

2020-11-30 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
Hello Tom, Thank you very much for your in-depth explanations. Actually enabling mac changes and forged transmits did the trick. A HUGE trick: While A was pinging R, I tried to look at the icmp requests and replies on B’s vmx1 interface. But they did not show. Neither bridge0 or vmx0 showed

bridge(4) Problems when running under ESXi ?

2020-11-29 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
Hi all, I am trying to setup an OpenBSD 6.7 virtual machine under VMware ESXi 6.7 to use as a filtering bridge between two virtual networks. I enabled promiscuous mode for both virtual switches. One network is the VMnet network, which is connected to the “outside world”. “A” ——> “B” ——> “R”

Re: bridge(4) Problems when running under ESXi ?

2020-11-29 Thread Tom Smyth
Hello Heinrich, it is not OpenBSD it is a Vmware issue ... virtualnets / vswitches in ESXI are not proper switches... they forward packets based on static mac- virtual port entries. (they do not do proper mac learning) you can set the vwswitch in the networking configuration section ... there

Re: bridge(4) Problems when running under ESXi ?

2020-11-29 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
Some things I forgot: All interfaces are UP pf(4) ist disabled bridge0 sees a bunch of lladdrs on em0 and one on em1, which is that of “A” -Heinrich > On 29. Nov 2020, at 22:29, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am trying to setup an OpenBSD 6.7 virtual machine under VMware ESXi 6.7

Re: bridge(4) Problems when running under ESXi ?

2020-11-29 Thread Heinrich Rebehn
Unfortunately, switching to vmx(4) did *not* do the trick -Heinrich > On 29. Nov 2020, at 22:38, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > > Some things I forgot: > > All interfaces are UP > pf(4) ist disabled > bridge0 sees a bunch of lladdrs on em0 and one on em1, which is that of “A” > > -Heinrich > >