* Christer Solskogen christer.solsko...@gmail.com [2011-10-18 21:47]:
Random is pretty fast on OpenBSD then. I have a 2010 Macbook Pro with
OSX (Lion) which does about 13MB/s. An a much older machine (with a
much slower cpu) with OpenBSD which does 65MB/s.
stop spreading lies, everybody knows
On 2011-10-18, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
I heard that since 4.9, there has been some changes to the
/dev/randoms in OpenBSD. I'm unsure of what the changes exactly
are, but for confidentiality in terms of entire hard drives (talking
terabytes of SATAII hard drives), would
From: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
Subject: Re: /dev/srandom
vs. /dev/arandom
To: James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com
Cc:
misc@openbsd.org
Date: Tuesday, October 18, 2011, 12:53 AM
I heard that
since 4.9, there
has been some changes to the
/dev/randoms in OpenBSD.
I'm unsure
In any case, I'm
getting just under 600KB/s on average with /dev/random. This is on a rather
old machine, so I guess it's not too bad.
I am getting 9MB/sec on a zaurus (416 MHz xscale arm).
If my math is right, you would see 600KB/sec on a 10 MHz Xeon.
Yes, I said MHz.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
In any case, I'm
getting just under 600KB/s on average with /dev/random. This is on a rather
old machine, so I guess it's not too bad.
I am getting 9MB/sec on a zaurus (416 MHz xscale arm).
Just so everyone is on
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
In any case, I'm
getting just under 600KB/s on average with /dev/random. This is on a rather
old machine, so I guess it's not too bad.
I am getting 9MB/sec on a zaurus (416 MHz xscale arm).
Just so
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 14:12, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.orgwrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
In any case, I'm
getting just under 600KB/s on average with /dev/random. This is on a
rather
old machine, so I guess it's not too
2011/10/18 vovka net.v...@gmail.com:
I am getting on average a weighted speed of approximately 80MB/sec
I got 116MB/sec on a HP DL360 G7 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5335 @ 2.00GHz,
2000.37 MHz with 4.9 amd64 if that's interesting for someone for some
kind of reference.
-- Johan
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
In any case, I'm
getting just under 600KB/s on average with /dev/random. This is on a
rather
old machine, so I guess it's not too bad.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 15:46, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Theo de Raadt
dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
In any case, I'm
getting just under
From: Paul D. Ouderkirk p...@ouderkirk.ca
Subject: Re: /dev/srandom vs.
/dev/arandom
To: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
Cc: James
Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com, misc@openbsd.org
Date: Tuesday, October 18,
2011, 5:41 PM
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM,
Theo de Raadt
dera
From: Paul D. Ouderkirk p...@ouderkirk.ca
Subject: Re: /dev/srandom vs.
/dev/arandom
To: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
Cc: James
Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com, misc@openbsd.org
Date: Tuesday, October 18,
2011, 5:41 PM
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM,
Theo de Raadt
dera
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:55 PM, James Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Paul D. Ouderkirk p...@ouderkirk.ca
Subject: Re: /dev/srandom vs.
/dev/arandom
To: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
Cc: James
Hozier guitars...@yahoo.com, misc@openbsd.org
Date: Tuesday, October 18,
2011
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
In any case, I'm
getting just under 600KB/s on average with /dev/random. This is on a
rather
old machine, so I guess it's not too
On 10/18/11 16:47, James Hozier wrote:
I'm doing dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/wd0c
and your bottleneck was anything but uh...(/dev/)random. :)
Doing it that way, you can't even push zeros out rapidly.
Add a block size flag. Long ago, someone who should know assured me (or
maybe the mail list?)
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:47:59PM -0700, James Hozier wrote:
I'm doing dd
if=/dev/random of=/dev/wd0c
Never use the block device for anything other than mounting.
Also, specify a block size. Something like
dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/rwd0c bs=64k
The r is really important. Play with the
I heard that since 4.9, there has been some changes to the /dev/randoms in
OpenBSD. I'm unsure of what the changes exactly are, but for confidentiality in
terms of entire hard drives (talking terabytes of SATAII hard drives), would
/dev/srandom still be the best suitable for this task? Last I
I heard that since 4.9, there has been some changes to the
/dev/randoms in OpenBSD. I'm unsure of what the changes exactly are,
but for confidentiality in terms of entire hard drives (talking
terabytes of SATAII hard drives), would /dev/srandom still be the best
suitable for this task?
There
18 matches
Mail list logo
