-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:17:11PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>>Even if you use the bash-static package, bash gets installed into
>>/usr/local/bin (IIRC) and you may not have /usr while being in single
>
Tobias Ulmer wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:50:14AM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Paul de Weerd wrote:
Don't change root's shell.
It's set to a static shell (/bin/ksh these days) for a reason.
Changing the root shell doesn't hurt. But you have to install your shell
static. I use th
the shell, but might break. Further more, all my upgrades are done
locally. I do not have the luxury of having a remote serial console with
those nasty pci cards that can put even the BIOS to go through the
serial. I can live with it. Will not recommend people anymore to change
Who said you need
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> As good example to help understand this in practice is just like this.
> You install your package bash-static, you think you are clever, fine.
> Then time pass, you work with someone else, a new release come out, you
> need to upgrade that box, but it happen to be remote. Yo
Greg Thomas wrote:
On 5/10/06, Giancarlo Razzolini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Don't change root's shell.
>
>
> It's set to a static shell (/bin/ksh these days) for a reason.
>
>
Changing the root shell doesn't hurt. But you have to install your shell
static. I use the bas
On 5/10/06, Giancarlo Razzolini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Don't change root's shell.
>
>
> It's set to a static shell (/bin/ksh these days) for a reason.
>
>
Changing the root shell doesn't hurt. But you have to install your shell
static. I use the bash-static from packag
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:50:14AM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Paul de Weerd wrote:
>
> > Don't change root's shell.
> >
> >
> > It's set to a static shell (/bin/ksh these days) for a reason.
> >
> >
> Changing the root shell doesn't hurt. But you have to install your shell
> static. I use
Hi!
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 04:17:11PM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>[...]
>> Changing the root shell doesn't hurt. But you have to install your shell
>There is absolutely no reason to change root's shell.
>There is even no reason at all to work as root.
>Use sudo, or even su -m, or execute bash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> Paul de Weerd wrote:
>
>
>>Don't change root's shell.
>>
>>
>>It's set to a static shell (/bin/ksh these days) for a reason.
>>
>>
>
> Changing the root shell doesn't hurt. But you have to install your shell
T
Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Don't change root's shell.
>
>
> It's set to a static shell (/bin/ksh these days) for a reason.
>
>
Changing the root shell doesn't hurt. But you have to install your shell
static. I use the bash-static from packages, and hadn't any problems. I
think that booting in single a
reboot in single mode (boot -s)
manually mount your partitions and delete unneeded trash :)
Tito Mari Francis Escaqo wrote:
I got me a 3.8 box as gateway with bash as root's default shell. The
pf logs filled up the /var partition and bash complained about not
being able to load libiconv which I
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:40:28PM +0700, Tito Mari Francis Esca?o wrote:
| I got me a 3.8 box as gateway with bash as root's default shell. The
| pf logs filled up the /var partition and bash complained about not
| being able to load libiconv which I believe is a dependency of bash.
| With the fai
I got me a 3.8 box as gateway with bash as root's default shell. The
pf logs filled up the /var partition and bash complained about not
being able to load libiconv which I believe is a dependency of bash.
With the failure of loading libiconv, I can't login on the gateway box
and I can't login remo
13 matches
Mail list logo
