On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 03:04:09AM +0200, Robert Urban wrote:
> if you want to be taken seriously,
Who is going to pay any attention to a top poster
> maybe you should change your
> e-mail address to something that isn't offensive to everyone who
> receives your e-mails, in this case, sev
Hi bofh,
You about Chris:
> Then I profess I do not understand why you get so pissed off when Adam
> pointed out that phpbb is not good, since apparently you don't consider
> it to be good by your own standards.
I think what Chris was getting all worked up about, was the fact that
Adam chose to s
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> bofh wrote:
> > On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I never said it was secure. In fact, I distinctly recall saying
> >> "hell no" to whether or not I considered phpBB secure. What I
> >> *did* say was that it fit my nee
Anybody considering using any application written in PHP should
consider Marc Espie's option about the PHP language (
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=114664070319490&w=2 )
- quote -
I'm not the maintainer of php itself, but still I have an opinion.
I don't like php, fr
bofh wrote:
> On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I never said it was secure. In fact, I distinctly recall saying
>> "hell no" to whether or not I considered phpBB secure. What I
>> *did* say was that it fit my needs, as I laid them out.
>
> Which is "good" to you, but probably
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> bofh wrote:
> > Bad comparison. MSFT's patches are across an entire product line. You
> are
> > talking about one specific product here. In order to get a valid
> > comparison, you will have to count patches for a product of similar size
>
Robert Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you want to be taken seriously, maybe you should change your
> e-mail address to something that isn't offensive to everyone who
> receives your e-mails, in this case, several thousand people.
I am glad to offend the people who find it offensive.
> You
if you want to be taken seriously, maybe you should change your
e-mail address to something that isn't offensive to everyone who
receives your e-mails, in this case, several thousand people.
You're just asking to be misunderstood. People misunderstand, and you
wonder why.
why don't you grow up? <
Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam wrote:
> > Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> He said "good and secure". Phpbb is neither.
> >>>
> >> Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
> >>
> > Nope.
> >
> Then you are a useless troll.
Or maybe I just
bofh wrote:
> Why is that a troll? He offered an opinion on Phpbb. It is neither good
> nor secure. [see below] Just because he cannot offer an alternative (there
> may not be a secure alternative even!)
>
Because that sentiment had already been echoed by others. No sense
beating dead horse
Original message
>Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:43:19 -0500
>From: bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [spam] Re: Forum-Software, good and secure, on OpenBSD systems?
>To: "Open BSD"
>
>On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 9/13/06, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Adam wrote:
> > Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>> He said "good and secure". Phpbb is neither.
> >>>
> >> Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
> >>
> > Nope.
>
>
> Then you are a useless troll. This will be my last
Adam wrote:
> Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> He said "good and secure". Phpbb is neither.
>>>
>> Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative
>>
> Nope.
>
Then you are a useless troll. This will be my last reply to your filth.
>> instead of just dissing the phpB
13 matches
Mail list logo
