On 2014/10/24 11:00, Rod Whitworth wrote:
None of the STUN etc that have arrived, since I last looked, any good?
STUN can help with weak forms of NAT as used on some simpler routers
but won't help with a symmetric NAT (i.e. one that checks both the
port numbers and addresses, like PF - if you're
Years ago I bought a Minitar VoIP ATA and it was great.
Then SWMBO wanted one too and I set up siproxd which mostly worked.
Then I go two global IPs and put one ATA/Phone on each. Perfect! No Siproxd!
Now I am about to need those 2 IPs.
Neither phone needs to recieve incoming calls.
Anybody
On 2014-10-23, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
Years ago I bought a Minitar VoIP ATA and it was great.
Then SWMBO wanted one too and I set up siproxd which mostly worked.
Then I go two global IPs and put one ATA/Phone on each. Perfect! No Siproxd!
Now I am about to need those 2
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:24:56 + (UTC), Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014-10-23, Rod Whitworth glis...@witworx.com wrote:
Years ago I bought a Minitar VoIP ATA and it was great.
Then SWMBO wanted one too and I set up siproxd which mostly worked.
Then I go two global IPs and put one ATA/Phone
4 matches
Mail list logo