On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:12:14PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us wrote:
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
would such large capacities actually be possible to ue with
openbsd for amd64
On 2014-10-28 13:27, Артур Истомин wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:12:14PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us
wrote:
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
would such large capacities actually be
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
would such large capacities actually be possible to ue with
openbsd for amd64 architecture?
use-case: working with large in-memory storage for financial applications.
thanks.
2014-10-26 20:02 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us:
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
Current hardware supports only 2^48...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Physical_address_space_details
Best
Martin
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us wrote:
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
would such large capacities actually be possible to ue with
openbsd for amd64 architecture?
use-case: working with large in-memory storage for financial
-Google-Sender-Auth: IKmvhqt48rk7l4iDtc9vhUAcBew
Subject: Re: 64-bit amd64 : actual memory limitations?
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Schr=C3=B6der?= mar...@oneiros.de
To: Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
14:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
References: 20141026190245.b09d21b5...@wolfman.devio.us
Subject: Re: 64-bit amd64 : actual memory limitations?
From: Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com
To: Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us
Cc: OpenBSD misc misc@openbsd.org
Content
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us wrote:
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
would such large capacities actually be possible to ue with
openbsd for amd64 architecture?
use-case: working with large in-memory storage for financial
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us wrote:
...
thanks for the details, but, since i am nowhere close to being a
systems programmer, would like to know if there's any chance such
support might be added in, in the near future?
You're asking whether in the near
/0qNdiRg785BETz5W7sXlccxMejJX wRZA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.136.169 with SMTP id
s41mr8262068ioi.36.1414375526232; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
References: 20141027005944.b2fb81b5...@wolfman.devio.us
Subject: Re: 64-bit amd64 : actual memory limitations?
From
2014-10-27 1:56 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us:
if the intended application actually requires larger memory to be
accessible, would it be better to go for a non-x86-64 64-bit hardware?
256TB (2^48) should be good enough till 2020.
-Google-Sender-Auth: _qqD-ym4zFJb3ZiF5l9BkvwN5DM
Subject: Re: 64-bit amd64 : actual memory limitations?
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Schr=C3=B6der?= mar...@oneiros.de
To: OpenBSD general usage list misc@openbsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
List-Help
2014-10-27 3:37 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us:
From owner-misc+m143...@openbsd.org Sun Oct 26 22:22:57 2014
Fix your mail client, please.
256TB (2^48) should be good enough till 2020.
it is for a lot of records (data-sets) to held in memory instead
of
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Martin Schröder wrote:
2014-10-27 1:56 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us:
if the intended application actually requires larger memory to be
accessible, would it be better to go for a non-x86-64 64-bit hardware?
256TB (2^48) should be good enough
14 matches
Mail list logo
