Re: Bandwidth loss

2005-05-14 Thread N. Raghavendra
At 2005-05-13T11:13:00+01:00, Ken wrote:

 Is it a leased line? Normally lines which aren't directly leased are 
 contended which means it's shared between other people. If this is the case 
 it's likely that someone else is also using most of the bandwidth on that 
 connection.
 
 Ask your ISP if it's contended.

The connection not shared.

I will upgrade the OS as suggested by Stuart, and will get back to the
list.

Raghavendra.

-- 
N. Raghavendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] | See mail headers for contact
Harish-Chandra Research Institute   | and OpenPGP details.



Re: Bandwidth loss

2005-05-14 Thread N. Raghavendra
At 2005-05-13T11:00:34+01:00, Stuart Henderson wrote:

 1. The OpenBSD version is nearly two years old. Update to recent 
 software, and see if the problem still exists. ...
 
 
 2. You provide no information about the hardware.

I will upgrade to OpenBSD 3.6, and will get back to the list with full
details if the problem persists.

Thank you.

Raghavendra.

-- 
N. Raghavendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] | See mail headers for contact
Harish-Chandra Research Institute   | and OpenPGP details.



Re: Bandwidth loss

2005-05-14 Thread Abraham Al-Saleh
I had a similar problem a month or so back, I have a 4 Mb/s cable
connection, and I could only get about 200 Kb/s. I switched my nics out,
changed the tcp receive window size, etc, but nothing worked. I was running
3.6, so I installed a fresh 3.7 snapshot, and haven't had a problem since.
So, if 3.6 doesn't work, wait until 3.7-release hits the mirrors, or grab a
snapshot (which is technically the next release) and see if it improves.

On 5/14/05, N. Raghavendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 At 2005-05-13T11:00:34+01:00, Stuart Henderson wrote:

  1. The OpenBSD version is nearly two years old. Update to recent
  software, and see if the problem still exists. ...
 
 
  2. You provide no information about the hardware.

 I will upgrade to OpenBSD 3.6, and will get back to the list with full
 details if the problem persists.

 Thank you.

 Raghavendra.

 --
 N. Raghavendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] | See mail headers for contact
 Harish-Chandra Research Institute | and OpenPGP details.




--
Abe Al-Saleh
And then came the Apocolypse. It actually wasn't that
bad, everyone got the day off and there were barbeques
all around.



Re: Bandwidth loss

2005-05-14 Thread Steve Shockley
Abraham Al-Saleh wrote:
So, if 3.6 doesn't work, wait until 3.7-release hits the mirrors, or grab a
snapshot (which is technically the next release) and see if it improves.
The snapshots are already well past 3.7-release, so you can't upgrade 
from a current snapshot to 3.7-release without problems.



Re: Bandwidth loss

2005-05-13 Thread Tony
Further, since the switch is manageable, it has some ability to report port
status.
Odds-on that there is a disagreement on FULL/HALF-DUPLEX between the switch
and the network card.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Stuart Henderson
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 5:01 AM
To: N. Raghavendra; OpenBSD Miscellaneous
Subject: Re: Bandwidth loss


--On 13 May 2005 15:01 +0530, N. Raghavendra wrote:

 We are running an OpenBSD 3.4 host, which is connected to a 1 Mbps,
 (=128 KBps) link to the Internet through a manageable switch.

There are two problems with this report:

1. The OpenBSD version is nearly two years old. Update to recent
software, and see if the problem still exists. Nobody wants to spend
time diagnosing a fault which may have been fixed long ago...

2. You provide no information about the hardware. If the problem still
exists after upgrading, send a complete dmesg, output of 'ifconfig -a',
output of 'netstat -in' after the box has carried some traffic, and
information about what media type the switch is using for the port
(full/half-duplex etc).