Re: Bitmask for 224.0.0.0 in Martians PF table entry

2018-01-11 Thread Aham Brahmasmi
Thank you Kapetanakis Giannis and Mike Coddington for your helpful replies. I will now use /3, since I do not think that I will use multicast. Regards, ab

Re: Bitmask for 224.0.0.0 in Martians PF table entry

2018-01-11 Thread Kapetanakis Giannis
On 10/01/18 20:55, Aham Brahmasmi wrote: > Hi, > > What is the correct bitmask for the 224.0.0.0 Martian table entry in > pf.conf? > > There are two bitmasks in two links on this page - > http://www.team-cymru.org/bogon-reference-http.html. /3 in the The Text > Bogon List, Aggregated and /4 in

Re: Bitmask for 224.0.0.0 in Martians PF table entry

2018-01-10 Thread Mike Coddington
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 07:55:53PM +0100, Aham Brahmasmi wrote: > Hi, > > What is the correct bitmask for the 224.0.0.0 Martian table entry in > pf.conf? > > There are two bitmasks in two links on this page - > http://www.team-cymru.org/bogon-reference-http.html. /3 in the The Text > Bogon List,

Bitmask for 224.0.0.0 in Martians PF table entry

2018-01-10 Thread Aham Brahmasmi
Hi, What is the correct bitmask for the 224.0.0.0 Martian table entry in pf.conf? There are two bitmasks in two links on this page - http://www.team-cymru.org/bogon-reference-http.html. /3 in the The Text Bogon List, Aggregated and /4 in IPv4 Fullbogons. /3 is also present in