* Mats Erik Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-13 02:28]:
having spent most of the evening to understand why
my kernel build suddenly aborted compilation with
a pointer to a missing call rt_mpath_next, I found
that the option SMALL_KERNEL clashes with
pseudo-device pf 1, and that this was
Hello,
having spent most of the evening to understand why
my kernel build suddenly aborted compilation with
a pointer to a missing call rt_mpath_next, I found
that the option SMALL_KERNEL clashes with
pseudo-device pf 1, and that this was the sole
cause for my failure. My original reason for
On 12/12/07, Mats Erik Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I am curious, are there any available documentation
as to what features the compilation option SMALL_KERNEL
definitely prevents? I did not succeed so far in
locating such a text. Of course, the man-page mentions
no. SMALL_KERNEL
Now I am curious, are there any available documentation
as to what features the compilation option SMALL_KERNEL
definitely prevents?
SMALL_KERNEL is an unfortunate (but small) hack that we
introduced into the source tree to allow us to continue
building very small kernels, for installation
4 matches
Mail list logo