On Sun, Apr 05, 2015 at 09:43:55AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >Why don't you craft the attack yourself and report to OpenBSD
> >your results?
>
> Quite obvious why the question was asked, rather than studied.
Yes, it is obvious. Because I'm incompetent, otherwise I would not ask.
(But this tr
>Why don't you craft the attack yourself and report to OpenBSD
>your results?
Quite obvious why the question was asked, rather than studied.
>On Sat, 4 Apr 2015, ? ??? wrote:
>
>> https://github.com/carmaa/inception/blob/master/README.md
>>
>> Is OpenBSD susceptible to this attack? I mea
Why don't you craft the attack yourself and report to OpenBSD
your results?
On Sat, 4 Apr 2015, ? ??? wrote:
https://github.com/carmaa/inception/blob/master/README.md
Is OpenBSD susceptible to this attack? I mean not tool themself,
I mean vector of attack.
And you are correct :)
http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/ieee1394/
removed 10 years ago. Sleep well on attic
2015-04-05 6:45 GMT+00:00 ludovic coues :
>>> INCEPTION
>>> =
>>>
>
>
>>> Once DMA is granted, the tool proceeds to search through available memory
>> pages
>>>
>> INCEPTION
>> =
>>
>> Once DMA is granted, the tool proceeds to search through available memory
> pages
>> for signatures at certain offsets in the operating system’s code. Once
> found,
I only have second hand knowledge of all this stuff.
Following information might be wrong.
Martin
Thank you for taking the trouble.
My thoughts? This is a bit of the kind of code you'd write in an
introduction to device drivers or an OS programming class. As others have
said, really old news, and an indication of the kind of trash an industry
led by Intel and Microsoft has foisted on the world
> All this is true and I totally agree with you. But there are partial
> workarounds against this attack (see Windows/MacOS). All I wanted to
> know whether there were any work in this direction. I'm not a programer.
> It is impossible for me to answer to yourself by studying commits to CVS.
An I
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 11:49:08AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 04/04/15 10:17, Артур Истомин wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 03:27:05PM +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
> >> 2015-04-04 13:08 GMT+02:00 Ðртур ИÑтомин :
> >> > https://github.com/carmaa/inception/blob/master/README.md
On 15-04-04 02:24 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
On Apr 4, 2015 8:50 PM, "�ртур И�томин"
wrote:
https://github.com/carmaa/inception/blob/master/README.md
I am not accessing that because, right now, I don't have a stable device
with which to access arbitrary stuff on the web.
Here's the te
On Apr 4, 2015 8:50 PM, "ÐÑÑÑÑ ÐÑÑомин"
wrote:
>
> https://github.com/carmaa/inception/blob/master/README.md
I am not accessing that because, right now, I don't have a stable device
with which to access arbitrary stuff on the web.
> Is OpenBSD susceptible to this attack? I mean not t
On 04/04/15 10:17, Артур Истомин wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 03:27:05PM +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
>> 2015-04-04 13:08 GMT+02:00 Ðртур ИÑтомин :
>> > https://github.com/carmaa/inception/blob/master/README.md
>> >
>> > Is OpenBSD susceptible to this attack? I mean not tool thems
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 03:27:05PM +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2015-04-04 13:08 GMT+02:00 Артур Истомин :
> > https://github.com/carmaa/inception/blob/master/README.md
> >
> > Is OpenBSD susceptible to this attack? I mean not tool themself,
> > I mean vector of attack.
>
> There is no Firewrir
2015-04-04 13:08 GMT+02:00 Артур Истомин :
> https://github.com/carmaa/inception/blob/master/README.md
>
> Is OpenBSD susceptible to this attack? I mean not tool themself,
> I mean vector of attack.
There is no Firewrire support in OpenBSD, so no.
Btw: This is old news.
https://github.com/carmaa/inception/blob/master/README.md
Is OpenBSD susceptible to this attack? I mean not tool themself,
I mean vector of attack.
14 matches
Mail list logo
