GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread Jeffrey Walton
Hi All, After installing GCC 4.2.4, I still have version 4.2.1. I've learned a little about pkg_add, so I went hunting for the README. $ find / -name gcc 2/dev/null /usr/local/lib/gcc /usr/local/libexec/gcc /usr/local/include/boost/mpl/aux_/preprocessed/gcc /usr/bin/gcc $ find /usr/local/lib

Re: GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread Amit Kulkarni
Hi All, After installing GCC 4.2.4, I still have version 4.2.1. I've learned a little about pkg_add, so I went hunting for the README. $ find / -name gcc 2/dev/null /usr/local/lib/gcc /usr/local/libexec/gcc /usr/local/include/boost/mpl/aux_/preprocessed/gcc /usr/bin/gcc $ find /usr

Re: GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread Nicholas Marriott
Ports gcc4 is called egcc so it doesn't conflict with base gcc4 which'll stay as 4.2.1 On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:40:46PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Hi All, After installing GCC 4.2.4, I still have version 4.2.1. I've learned a little about pkg_add, so I went hunting for the README

Re: GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, LeviaComm Networks n...@leviacomm.net wrote: On 15-Sep-11 11:40, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Hi All, After installing GCC 4.2.4, I still have version 4.2.1. I've learned a little about pkg_add, so I went hunting for the README. $ find / -name gcc 2/dev/null /usr

Re: GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread LeviaComm Networks
On 15-Sep-11 11:40, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Hi All, After installing GCC 4.2.4, I still have version 4.2.1. I've learned a little about pkg_add, so I went hunting for the README. $ find / -name gcc 2/dev/null /usr/local/lib/gcc /usr/local/libexec/gcc /usr/local/include/boost/mpl/aux_

Re: GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread Marc Espie
out of the box). lol. 4.2.1 *in OpenBSD* is hardened more, and has been tested as an hardened compiler for more time than gcc 4.2.4. (unless you want to get f*d harder by the GPLv3, that is)

Re: GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread Jeffrey Walton
) the compiler/linker is using hardened settings (I know 4.2.1 is not hardened out of the box). lol. 4.2.1 *in OpenBSD* is hardened more, and has been tested as an hardened compiler for more time than gcc 4.2.4. I believe -z relro -z now are fairly standard for GOT and PLT attack remediations. I know some

Re: GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread J Sisson
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote: I sometimes wonder about the whole free software, free beer thing. Its kind of like trying to figure out how US politicians claim to balance a budget, yet the US is trillions in debt. Here's a hint: Someone is

Re: GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread Theo de Raadt
: cah8yc8mnmn7d8l_gomapmztwzqoqurfxtqlktnl1ukpcg10...@mail.gmail.com 4e724b95.7000...@leviacomm.net CAH8yC8=iqkWU-G4Woeuhm6asx_cABCaXJ=yXwFcuypf=sp6...@mail.gmail.com 20110915212336.ga19...@lain.home Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:59:03 -0400 Subject: Re: GCC 4.2.4? From: Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com To: es...@nerim.net

Re: GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread Theo de Raadt
I sometimes wonder about the whole free software, free beer thing. Its kind of like trying to figure out how US politicians claim to balance a budget, yet the US is trillions in debt. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Tre It became necessary to encumber the software to free it.

Re: GCC 4.2.4?

2011-09-15 Thread Tomas Bodzar
problem (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21656); and (2) the compiler/linker is using hardened settings (I know 4.2.1 is not hardened out of the box). lol. 4.2.1 *in OpenBSD* is hardened more, and has been tested as an hardened compiler for more time than gcc 4.2.4. I believe -z