On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 01:11:30PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:51:34AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly.
> >
> > I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a
> >
Hi Walter,
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 11:51:34 +0100 Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> So, in general and based on your experience, do you think using dkim
> (that implies daemon, port redirections, etc.) is really worth?
In terms of delivery to popular free mail providers, it sees to me that
reverse
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:51:34AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly.
>
> I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a
> conclusion. I'd appreciate the opinion of the experienced.
>
> I'm
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, at 11:51 AM, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly.
>
> I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a
> conclusion. I'd appreciate the opinion of the experienced.
>
> I'm noticing
I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly.
I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a
conclusion. I'd appreciate the opinion of the experienced.
I'm noticing messages with no spf or dkim records reach my gmail inbox.
At the same time,
5 matches
Mail list logo