Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:29:22PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about
how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are
Hi All,
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:01:50 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net
wrote:
I was clearly out of place.
Same to you Steph, I shouldn't have reacted so quickly to your email
address
and have wrongly concluded to an
Hi Daniel and Misc@,
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:29:22 +0700, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net
wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer
about
how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net wrote:
I was clearly out of place.
Same to you Steph, I shouldn't have reacted so quickly to your email address
and have wrongly concluded to an other Linux quick miss place question, or
reaction.
What I've learned from this
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:29:22PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about
how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are
just wrong. Sure people
On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:58:08 -0500 Daniel Ouellet dan...@presscom.net
wrote:
Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
Best,
Daniel
With all due respect Daniel, I disagree, and I think you've misread
things a bit. The original poster, Insan Praja, stated he had a panic
with both a GENERIC kernel,
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:58:08PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
And note that there have recently been changes in the way pf
keeps track of icmp, so this may well be a valid report.
Could sure be I give you that. However, still true that snapshot is the
way to go and
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Robert rob...@openbsd.pap.st wrote:
Wrong.
Reporting problems with kernels built from unmodified source is fine.
Appologies, I stant corrected.
Steph
Hi Claudio and Misc@,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:35:30 +0700, Claudio Jeker
cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:58:08PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi,
On Sat,
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Fell free to disagree, that's fair.
Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about
how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are
just wrong. Sure people are encuraged to run snapshot kernels but
selfbuilt kernels are
Hi Misc@,
on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says:
uvm_fault(0xd08079c0, 0x0, 0, 1) - e
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped at pf_icmp_mapping+0x45: movw 0x4(%eax),%ax
ddb trace
pf_icmp_mapping(dc2c5ba0,8,dc2c5b34,dc2c5b38,dc2c5b3c,dc2c5b3e,2) at
pf_icmp_mapping+0x45
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Misc@,
on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says:
Hello,
As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you need to try
out a snapshot instead and see if it works.
Cheers,
Steph
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Misc@,
on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says:
Hello,
As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you
On Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:17:57 +
FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
As far as I know, home built kernel is not supported, you need to try
out a snapshot instead and see if it works.
Cheers,
Steph
Wrong.
Reporting problems with kernels built from unmodified source is fine.
-
Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Misc@,
on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I got panic. It says:
Hello,
As far as I know, home built kernel
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW
insan.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Misc@,
on a i386 kernel recent build (6th march), I
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja SW
insan.pr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Misc@,
on a i386 kernel recent
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:58:08PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:07:00PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Insan Praja SW wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:17:57 +0700, FRLinux frli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Insan Praja
18 matches
Mail list logo
