Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-04 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 01:37:53PM -0700, Bob Beck wrote: * Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 06:19]: No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news. Dunno about no harm done there marco - Saying fox news doesn't do any harm is like saying Joesph Goebels

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-04 Thread new_guy
like, it matters not. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/License-Violation---ksh-tf4932920.html#a14163439 Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-03 Thread Marco Peereboom
No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news. On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:32:56AM -0500, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote: Jacob Meuser wrote: On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:05:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote: There are other sources as well:

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-03 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Marco Peereboom wrote: No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news. I like that one! (; Started my day on a good note. Always thought Fox News was really bad, but felt many disagree.

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-03 Thread Lars Noodén
Daniel Ouellet wrote: ... Always thought Faux News was really bad,... There. Fixed it for you. ;)

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-03 Thread Bob Beck
* Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 06:19]: No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news. Dunno about no harm done there marco - Saying fox news doesn't do any harm is like saying Joesph Goebels didn't to any harm - only perpetuated stupidity..

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-03 Thread Jacob Yocom-Piatt
Bob Beck wrote: * Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-03 06:19]: No harm done just stupidity perpetuated. Kind of like fox news. Dunno about no harm done there marco - Saying fox news doesn't do any harm is like saying Joesph Goebels didn't to any harm - only

License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread Pedro de Oliveira
Hello, Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't this a license violation?

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread Miod Vallat
Hello, Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't this a license violation? See /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL. People can do just about whatever they want with public domain code,

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread Marco S Hyman
Pedro de Oliveira writes: Hello, Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't this a license violation? See /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL. People can do just about whatever they want with

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread Ivo van der Sangen
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:30:02PM -, Pedro de Oliveira wrote: Hello, Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't this a license violation? It seems that this is not a violation

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread Marco S Hyman
Miod Vallat writes: But some parts of OpenBSD's ksh are BSD-licensed files, which did not come from pdksh initially. That's not what /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL states, but I didn't look further. OK, looking I see that alloc.c and mknod.c have copyrights. Relicensing these files under GPLv3 is

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread ropers
Pedro de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Someone on IRC just posted this link http://www.delilinux.de/oksh/ , seems like someone ported OpenBSD ksh to Linux and licensed it under GPLv3. Isn't this a license violation? Marco S Hyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread Ivo van der Sangen
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 06:14:09PM -0300, Andr?s wrote: On Dec 2, 2007 5:42 PM, Marco S Hyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Miod Vallat writes: But some parts of OpenBSD's ksh are BSD-licensed files, which did not come from pdksh initially. That's not what /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL states,

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread Matthew Weigel
Marco S Hyman wrote: Miod Vallat writes: But some parts of OpenBSD's ksh are BSD-licensed files, which did not come from pdksh initially. That's not what /usr/src/bin/ksh/LEGAL states, but I didn't look further. OK, looking I see that alloc.c and mknod.c have copyrights.

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread Marco Peereboom
There are other sources as well: http://www.peereboom.us/ksh_linux.html http://www.wormhole.hu/~ice/ksh/ Don't know why that dude went through the trouble of putting gplv3 shit on it. On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 07:30:02PM -, Pedro de Oliveira wrote: Hello, Someone on IRC just posted this link

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:05:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote: There are other sources as well: http://www.peereboom.us/ksh_linux.html http://www.wormhole.hu/~ice/ksh/ Don't know why that dude went through the trouble of putting gplv3 shit on it. fear, misunderstanding, and confusion

Re: License Violation - ksh

2007-12-02 Thread David H. Lynch Jr.
Jacob Meuser wrote: On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:05:10PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote: There are other sources as well: http://www.peereboom.us/ksh_linux.html http://www.wormhole.hu/~ice/ksh/ Don't know why that dude went through the trouble of putting gplv3 shit on it. fear,