We host our own web-servers so DSR shouldn't be a problem. Will probably
get rid of the co-located balancers and bring them inside our network as
we dont really gain anything from co-locating. Might just use something
simple like lbnamed !
Adam wrote:
Linden Varley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No argument there on the pragmatics.
But it does work, and a lot of places use it.
~BAS
FYI I wasn't advocating implementing it; just providing background. If
you want it, shell the $500k for the hardware L.B.
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 00:07 +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:40:36 +1000
Darren Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to to this the way the IBM eNetwork dispatchers
used to do this? Put all of the machines on the same broadcast
domain, then:
1. add a static published arp entry for the cluster address on the
Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:40:36 +1000
Darren Tucker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
1. add a static published arp entry for the cluster address on the
balancer with its own mac address so packets aimed at the cluster
address will go to the balancer.
2. configure all
pass in on $ext_if route-to { $webh1, $webh2 } round-robin proto
tcp \ from any to $virt_ip port http no state
pass out on $int_if from any to $virt_ip port http no state
Wouldn't you need some kind of state here? Otherwise there's no
guarantee of the packets for a given connection
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:42:24AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:54:58 +0800
Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linden Varley wrote:
Anyone know of any load balancing software for OpenBSD that can do
direct-server return? (our load balancers (openbsd
This is like Local Triangulation in Radware-speak? (Don't know what
F5) calls it. Basically you bring up an alias on lo0 or lo1 primary as
the inet4 of your HAL4 address and as long as everything is in the same
subnet...
~BAS
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 12:25 +1000, Linden Varley wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:05:44 +0200
Reyk Floeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i don't like the idea about DSR, it sounds like an evil hack to get
some performance at the wrong place. it is better to focus on
improving the pf/network stack performance itself and to be able to do
traffic filtering
Such as Distributed computing environments where you have your HAL4
service VIP on the same segment/subnet as your distributed server farm.
Or HA databses
~BAS
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:49 +0200, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
best pf network stack cannot solve.
--
Brian A. Seklecki [EMAIL
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 12:36:33PM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
Such as Distributed computing environments where you have your HAL4
service VIP on the same segment/subnet as your distributed server farm.
so they should redesign their network instead of inventing crazy
features. this DSR
The only reason we need DSR is our load-balancers are co-located and we
have a limit on data usage so the connection needs to be offloaded to
the server/client and not proxied as this would get quite expensive with
the traffic flowing through our co-location pipe.
Might have to move to Linux
Linden Varley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only reason we need DSR is our load-balancers are co-located and we
have a limit on data usage so the connection needs to be offloaded to
the server/client and not proxied as this would get quite expensive with
the traffic flowing through our
Load-balancers were co-located for redundancy reasons I believe. Its
just a shame traffic in/out is paid-for so even if web-servers were also
co-located then traffic will still be metered.
We could bring the load-balancers into our network to stop this problem
but we have two-sites on
Linden Varley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Load-balancers were co-located for redundancy reasons I believe. Its
just a shame traffic in/out is paid-for so even if web-servers were also
co-located then traffic will still be metered.
If your web servers and load balancers aren't on the same
Hi,
Anyone know of any load balancing software for OpenBSD that can do
direct-server return? (our load balancers (openbsd boxes) are co-located
and we pay for all data bandwidth).
Something like BalanceNG (which unfortunately doesnt run on OpenBSD)
woudl be ideal.
It is generally for http
On 6/12/07, Linden Varley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is generally for http layer requests but I don't think apache
re-directs will suffice.
You may want to look at pound. A lot of people seem to like it.
--
This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity.
-- Sandhurst
Linden Varley wrote:
Anyone know of any load balancing software for OpenBSD that can do
direct-server return? (our load balancers (openbsd boxes) are co-located
and we pay for all data bandwidth).
hoststated?
---
Lars Hansson
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:54:58 +0800
Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linden Varley wrote:
Anyone know of any load balancing software for OpenBSD that can do
direct-server return? (our load balancers (openbsd boxes) are
co-located and we pay for all data bandwidth).
hoststated?
18 matches
Mail list logo
