Memory leak in openbgpd ?

2005-11-01 Thread Xavier Beaudouin

Hi there...

Seems I have found some memory leak inside bgpd...

When I set route-collector no in bgpd.conf my bgpd processes seems to 
growing and growing (I had some process to grow using more than 1G of 
total memory) when running it several days.


But

When I just comment it :

#route-collector no

The bgpd system is working correctly without any problems...

I have tested that on production system with 2 full view and 2 ibgp view...

If you need some more informations and examples please drop me a email.

(note this bug has been seen on 3.7 Release on sparc64 and on 3.8 beta 
on x86... I think it is on 3.8 release also but I didn't tested yet)..


/xavier



Re: Memory leak in openbgpd ?

2005-11-01 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:23:59AM +0100, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
 Hi there...
 
 Seems I have found some memory leak inside bgpd...
 
 When I set route-collector no in bgpd.conf my bgpd processes seems to 
 growing and growing (I had some process to grow using more than 1G of 
 total memory) when running it several days.
 
 But
 
 When I just comment it :
 
 #route-collector no
 
 The bgpd system is working correctly without any problems...
 

Hmm. That does not make sense.
#route-collector no
and
route-collector no
result in the same action. As route-collector no is the default action.
Will have a look at it.

 I have tested that on production system with 2 full view and 2 ibgp view...
 
 If you need some more informations and examples please drop me a email.
 
 (note this bug has been seen on 3.7 Release on sparc64 and on 3.8 beta 
 on x86... I think it is on 3.8 release also but I didn't tested yet)..
 

Hmm. If possible the full config could be helpful.
Any idea how fast it is leaking memory?

-- 
:wq Claudio