On August 28, 2018 3:04 AM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
> On 28 August 2018 at 05:26, Joseph Mayer joseph.ma...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > Joel,
> > Are you saying you gave up on using the PCIe at all?
> > There's a 4-lane PCIe connector on the Rock64 right, aren't those
> > dedicated lanes, and,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 21:48:17 +0200
Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 01:49:47PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
> > Patrick Wildt wrote:
> >
> > > On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> > > EspressoBin we do suppor
Hi Carlos,
Check out this reddit post with similar questions.
https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/966wpe/running_on_a_sbcsoc_rock64_rpi_beaglebone_etc
Hi Aaron - I have a Rangely c2xxx sitting on my desk right now. It's a
lanner rebadged as Nuage NSG-E.
This platform is able to do around 3.6gbit through it without
encryption (and around 1.3gbit total if encryption is turned on
everything). This one has 4 Intel igb 345 cards and 2 i210's - it's
d
On 28 August 2018 at 05:26, Joseph Mayer wrote:
> Joel,
>
> Are you saying you gave up on using the PCIe at all?
>
> There's a 4-lane PCIe connector on the Rock64 right, aren't those
> dedicated lanes, and, if they'd somehow be shared with any other
> hardware, then you should still have supposedl
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 01:49:47PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
> Patrick Wildt wrote:
>
> > On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> > EspressoBin we do support the ethernet controller, but the connected
> > switch is a mess that
On 08/27/18 09:11, Jon Tabor wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 01:33:27PM +0200, Mohamed Fouad wrote:
Hi Carlos, i have a similar requirement and i am considering testing a
banana pi router at this moment.
I'm currently using a Banana Pro as my home router/firewall. I experienced a
bunch of
Joel,
Are you saying you gave up on using the PCIe at all?
There's a 4-lane PCIe connector on the Rock64 right, aren't those
dedicated lanes, and, if they'd somehow be shared with any other
hardware, then you should still have supposedly >90% of the 16gbps
capacity available?
Did you try connect
Have you considered any of intel’s atom c2000 or c3000 series SoC? I have
openbsd running with several services, multiple vlans and a 500 down 20 up
internet connection I can saturate on a c2000 series board
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 26, 2018, at 5:26 AM, Carlos López wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 01:33:27PM +0200, Mohamed Fouad wrote:
> Hi Carlos, i have a similar requirement and i am considering testing a
> banana pi router at this moment.
>
>
I'm currently using a Banana Pro as my home router/firewall. I experienced a
bunch of packet loss on the internal port (
I do actually have an rk3399 (firefly) - like you I also had high hopes for it.
It's still the best out of the Arm boards I've tried, but the lanes
are shared with the GMAC on the SoC so you end up not getting what you
might hope for; you can Sorta get another Gigabit port by using the
USB-C port
Yeah I got excited about the MachiattoBin when I first saw it - it's
possibly the first non-x86 SOHO router that can actually do 14MPPS
needed for 10G in the home.
BUT
The Copper ethernet situation is problematic, the original design
shares the PCI Bus with the SFP Slots to provide copper 10G opt
On August 26, 2018 3:16 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
..
> I have a bunch of various SBC and they all suck pretty bad for network
> tasks. Fine for random server tasks but don't put them in your network
> path unless you like artificial bottlenecks.
Please note that the RK3399 (e.g. Pine64 ROCK6
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> EspressoBin we do support the ethernet controller, but the connected
> switch is a mess that I don't dare to support. Got other stuff to do.
> Though I am working on
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:30:15 -0700
Carlos Cardenas wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 05:50:02PM +0200, David Bern wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
> > Patrick Wildt wrote:
> >
> > > On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> > > EspressoBin we do supp
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 05:50:02PM +0200, David Bern wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
> Patrick Wildt wrote:
>
> > On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> > EspressoBin we do support the ethernet controller, but the connected
> > switch is a mess that I
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> EspressoBin we do support the ethernet controller, but the connected
> switch is a mess that I don't dare to support. Got other stuff to do.
> Though I am working on
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 11:00:26AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018-08-26, Carlos López wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26/08/2018 11:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
> >> netboot works fine. However almost all of the Arm platforms including
> >> the Rpi3 make terrible gateways and in general l3 packe
Hi Carlos, i have a similar requirement and i am considering testing a
banana pi router at this moment.
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 11:30 am Carlos López, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am considering to buy an ARM based device to use it with OpenBSD as
> a personal/portable firewall, IDS and Tor gateway.
>
Still IME best bang for buck is n3160 ATOM based mini-pc's there are
several vendors (Jetway/Qotom) and you can get an AES-NI capable 4
core machine with dual NICs that will do 5Gbit Duplex on the nose for
less than 90$ USD.
I know intel isn't the flavour of the month, but these machines lack
Mana
On 2018-08-26, Carlos López wrote:
>
>
> On 26/08/2018 11:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
>> netboot works fine. However almost all of the Arm platforms including
>> the Rpi3 make terrible gateways and in general l3 packet path
>> machines.
>>
>> I have a bunch of various SBC and they all suck pre
On 26/08/2018 11:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
netboot works fine. However almost all of the Arm platforms including
the Rpi3 make terrible gateways and in general l3 packet path
machines.
I have a bunch of various SBC and they all suck pretty bad for network
tasks. Fine for random server ta
netboot works fine. However almost all of the Arm platforms including
the Rpi3 make terrible gateways and in general l3 packet path
machines.
I have a bunch of various SBC and they all suck pretty bad for network
tasks. Fine for random server tasks but don't put them in your network
path unless yo
Hi hola,
The raspi is fiddly for installing openbsd. One needs a special usb cable to
install obsd because there is no driver for the sdcard booting device!
Regards
Alfredo
On 26 Aug 2018, 10:30 +0100, Carlos López , wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am considering to buy an ARM based device to use it with O
Hi all,
I am considering to buy an ARM based device to use it with OpenBSD as
a personal/portable firewall, IDS and Tor gateway.
My only requirements are:
a/ OpenBSD well hardware's supported
b/ Best network throughput
It seems Raspberry 3 B+ maybe the best option, but I am not pretty s
25 matches
Mail list logo
