On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, Stuart Longland wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 07:26:54 +0100
Caspar Schutijser wrote:
I find that, even with Firefox configured to separate the two, I'll
start keying in an address like `http://some.internal.site/` and
Firefox "thinks" I want to do a Google search for
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 03:18:36PM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 15:38:11 + (UTC)
> Roderick wrote:
>
> > With chrome I have a problem, because it does not separate URL
> > entry from search entry.
>
> I find that, even with Firefox configured to separate the two, I'll
On 2022-01-20, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Crystal Kolipe wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 03:38:11PM +, Roderick wrote:
>>> I just updated OpenBSD to 7.0. After pkg_add -u, it seems
>>> firefox was not updated:
>> Firefox no longer builds on i386, since shortly after the release of
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 04:28:45PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 15:38:11 + (UTC)
> > Roderick wrote:
> >
> > > With chrome I have a problem, because it does not separate URL
> > > entry from search entry.
>
> Why is that a problem?
Presumably because if you make a typo
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 15:38:11 + (UTC)
> Roderick wrote:
>
> > With chrome I have a problem, because it does not separate URL
> > entry from search entry.
Why is that a problem?
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 01:46:11AM +0100, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 03:38:11PM +, Roderick wrote:
> >> I just updated OpenBSD to 7.0. After pkg_add -u, it seems
> >> firefox was not updated:
> > Firefox no longer builds on i386, since shortly
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022, Roderick wrote:
It seems there is a way to disable the search in chrome "omnibox",
but it is still not clear to me how to do it.
I added a "search engine" in settings with URL "http://localhost?q=%s;,
set it as default and deleted all other search engines.
Do you know a
Surf is actually excellent BUT it has no ad blocker and some sites don’t
load properly, ala YouTube.
On Friday, January 7, 2022, Crystal Kolipe
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 04:36:36PM +, Roderick wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> >
> > >>But you might encounter
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 11:39:43AM -0500, Daniel Wilkins wrote:
> Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> >>* https://sourceforge.net/projects/midori-browser/ (as on Raspbian)
> >Midori might be worth looking at as a light-weight browser replacement for
> >Firefox, although I haven't used it for a number of
I do internet banking with epiphany.
On 1/7/22, Raymond, David wrote:
> I use epiphany quite a bit, and like it a lot, though there are
> websites on which it crashes. It uses the same toolkit as midori and
> in my opinion has a somewhat better user interface. Don't know
> whether it works on
I use epiphany quite a bit, and like it a lot, though there are
websites on which it crashes. It uses the same toolkit as midori and
in my opinion has a somewhat better user interface. Don't know
whether it works on i386 at this point.
Dave Raymond
On 1/7/22, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> On Fri,
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 04:36:36PM +, Roderick wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
>
> >>But you might encounter increasingly more websites that do not work
> >>with them, as the web grows in complexity.
> >
> >Agreed.
>
> And this is the main point. I need the web browser
Crystal Kolipe wrote:
* https://sourceforge.net/projects/midori-browser/ (as on Raspbian)
Midori might be worth looking at as a light-weight browser replacement for
Firefox, although I haven't used it for a number of years.
Worth nothing that this version of Midori has been abandoned for the
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
But you might encounter increasingly more websites that do not work
with them, as the web grows in complexity.
Agreed.
And this is the main point. I need the web browser for example for
internetbanking, not just "surfing". The web developers
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 05:06:24PM +0100, Josuah Demangeon wrote:
> * https://surf.suckless.org/ (webkit/gtk+)
Surf would work well on his hardware, but it's minimal interface is somewhat
different to a traditional web browser, and probably not what he is expecting.
It also has some fairly
Roderick wrote:
> I just updated OpenBSD to 7.0. After pkg_add -u, it seems
> firefox was not updated:
I did not have this problem with firefox installed before my 6.9
-> 7.0 upgrade, but I'm on amd64 :
lap1$ uname -a
OpenBSD lap1.josuah.net 7.0 GENERIC.MP#3 amd64
lap1$
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
Are you actually running on hardware that doesn't support amd64?
That is the case. A light and small samsumg nc10 nettop. No amd64,
only 2 GB RAM.
The problem is that important Web-Sites are done for chrome and firefox.
I do not see much choice.
I
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 03:38:11PM +, Roderick wrote:
> I just updated OpenBSD to 7.0. After pkg_add -u, it seems
> firefox was not updated:
Firefox no longer builds on i386, since shortly after the release of OpenBSD
6.9.
> Any hint?
Are you actually running on hardware that doesn't
I just updated OpenBSD to 7.0. After pkg_add -u, it seems
firefox was not updated:
firefox core dumped, I deleted it, but I cannot reinstall it
(cannot find that package).
With chrome I have a problem, because it does not separate URL
entry from search entry. And I do not know an alternative
19 matches
Mail list logo
