On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 07:56:10PM +0200, Tomasz Rola wrote:
[...]
> machine, two of which killed more than six hundred people, before
> someone turned the switch. As for now, there was a way to stop it.
I have rechecked and the number of fatalities was 189 and 157,
totaling 346 people. Please
On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 09:49:02PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Stuart Longland wrote:
[...]
>
> > Basically your best bet: don't rely on a single vendor. It's harder for
> > them to hide their espionage then as one vendor won't know how to hide
> > another vendor's dirty deeds.
>
>
On 06/07/2019, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Precisely. Most of the risks are in the bugs, and if you hit a problem
> you'll be Dennis Muilenburg saying you didn't know (that phrase works
> one way today, but if in the next few days he leaves his position, it
> will work a different way). The unknown
> On Jul 5, 2019, at 10:49 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> So this is misc, which is full of lots of talk about nothing, by people
> who can't change the ecosystem. Having worried vocally about this
> before, I know I can't change it. Pretty sad to see people who are even
> less capable find
Stuart Longland wrote:
> On 2/7/19 5:43 pm, John Long wrote:
> >> What do you think and do when using OpenBSD on this kind of hardware?
> > Lemote boxes are kinda neat but they're not the fastest in the world.
> > It beats the hell out of the alternatives if you can live with the
> >
On 2/7/19 5:43 pm, John Long wrote:
>> What do you think and do when using OpenBSD on this kind of hardware?
> Lemote boxes are kinda neat but they're not the fastest in the world.
> It beats the hell out of the alternatives if you can live with the
> limitations.
Gentoo was donated two Lemote
On 04/07/2019, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> ropers writes:
>> ::I put on my robe and tinfoil hat.::
>
>> ... Wow. The things you guys come up with ...
>
> I mean yeah, I guess, in theory maybe?
>
> Of course in order to achieve this level of evil you need highly competent
> governments and
ropers writes:
> ::I put on my robe and tinfoil hat.::
> ... Wow. The things you guys come up with ...
I mean yeah, I guess, in theory maybe?
Of course in order to achieve this level of evil you need highly competent
governments and corporations but that's no problem right?
Matthew
::I put on my robe and tinfoil hat.::
What keeps me awake at night is the thought of code running on things
we traditionally don't even think of as having CPUs, like on SSDs, on
the integrated device electronics of SATA disks for example.
Or on the CPU inside your CPU, like the Minix computer
Mihai,
Do you want to protest companies by not buying their equipment? That is the
only feasible outcome from this conversation.
The other outcome would be you want advice on what models will work on OpenBSD.
-Brian
> On Jul 3, 2019, at 12:11 PM, Zack Lofgren wrote:
>
> Mihai,
>
> It
Mihai,
It depends on your threat model. You can’t absolutely trust any hardware
because of low level firmware. However, that doesn’t matter if your threat
model is low enough then that doesn’t matter. Are you an enemy of the state? If
so, you probably shouldn’t trust any technology. If you’re
...
I asked for an answer more like "avoid using nVidia chipsets", not for theories.
So, again, do you consider brands when choosing hardware, like Dell
vs. Lenovo, etc. ?
Thank you.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from noise,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon%E2%80%93Hartley_theorem
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:30 PM Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
> Oh and if the implant is smart, it’ll detect you’re trying to find it and go
>
I’m fine with hardware implants snooping on me. But if I was a CISO for a huge
company, I might go the extra mile to care about said implants.
I’ll continue living carefree.
> On Jul 2, 2019, at 1:42 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:28 PM Brian Brombacher
> wrote:
>
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 1:28 PM Brian Brombacher
wrote:
> Oh and if the implant is smart, it’ll detect you’re trying to find it and
> go dormant.
>
> Even more good luck!
Well then the solution is obvious.
Design your own hardware.
Or learn to live off the land.
Oh and if the implant is smart, it’ll detect you’re trying to find it and go
dormant.
Even more good luck!
> On Jul 2, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
> Hardware implants go beyond just sending packets out your network card. They
> have transceivers that let agents control or
Hardware implants go beyond just sending packets out your network card. They
have transceivers that let agents control or snoop the device from a distance
using RF.
You need to scan the hardware with RF equipment to be sure.
Good luck!
> On Jul 2, 2019, at 12:27 PM, Misc User wrote:
>
>>
On 7/2/2019 12:43 AM, John Long wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 10:07:59 +0300
Mihai Popescu wrote:
Hello,
I keep finding articles about some government bans against some
hardware manufacturers related to some backdoor for espionage. I know
this is an old talk. Most China manufacturers are under
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 10:07:59 +0300
Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I keep finding articles about some government bans against some
> hardware manufacturers related to some backdoor for espionage. I know
> this is an old talk. Most China manufacturers are under the search:
> Huawei, ZTE,
Hello,
I keep finding articles about some government bans against some
hardware manufacturers related to some backdoor for espionage. I know
this is an old talk. Most China manufacturers are under the search:
Huawei, ZTE, Lenovo, etc.
What do you think and do when using OpenBSD on this kind of
20 matches
Mail list logo
