On Jul 05 03:36:30, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> >On 2012-06-27 19:25, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Peter Laufenberg
> >>> wrote:
> I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a professional
> >> graphic
> >>> designer to redo parts of OpenBSD's visual
>On 2012-06-27 19:25, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Peter Laufenberg
>>> wrote:
I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a professional
>> graphic
>>> designer to redo parts of OpenBSD's visual design. His portfolio:
>>>
>>> that would be cool to pr
On 2012-06-27 19:25, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Peter Laufenberg
>> wrote:
>>> I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a professional
> graphic
>> designer to redo parts of OpenBSD's visual design. His portfolio:
>>
>> that would be cool to presence a
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> Other than "boring", no one has actually STATED a problem of the OpenBSD
> website.
That's because there is no problem with it. Sure, it doesn't look like
the latest
whizz-bang sites (I have nothing against such sites, btw) but neither does i
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Eric Furman wrote:
> I beg all true @misc followers
> Search the archives for this shit eating moron's posts.
Funny, the only ones showing up when I search for useless posts are yours.
Cheers,
Lars
On 2012-06-28, Tim Howe wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:09:37 -0700
> patrick keshishian wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Tim Howe wrote:
>> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:26:52 +0200
>> > Marc Espie wrote:
>> >
>> >> If you guys are serious about anything, go look at ports-readmes.
>> >
oi, fur-for-brains-man
you said you will never see an email from me ever
because i go directly to /dev/null.
your mama's so fat you cannot even set up procmail.
hmm, on Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 07:20:29AM -0400, Eric Furman said that
> frantisek holop is a shit eating moron who should
> be ignore
On Wed 27/06/12 08:32, "Theo de Raadt" dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
> > > I'd prefer the (small) team of developers
> to work on the code.
> >
> > > Well, that's a false dichotomy: not all OpenBSD
> committers work on the
> > code. A handful work pri
what kind of shit are we talking about here? Scheisster baby eat my caviar
turds or sinewy shrimp intestines you have to swallow wholesale lest being
called a fag?
Don't leave this up for interpretation or commentators unaware of Tourette
syndrome tax deductions will /again/ quote out of contex
frantisek holop is a shit eating moron who should
be ignored by anyone who is not a shit eating moron...
FUCK YOU holop.
FUCK YOU holop.
Please SHUT THE FUCK UP you stupid moron, frantisek holop.
I beg all true @misc followers
Search the archives for this shit eating moron's posts.
He is nothing bu
hmm, on Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 01:19:47PM +1000, Sunnz Yiu said that
> On Jun 29, 2012 6:56 AM, "frantisek holop" wrote:
> >
> > hmm, on Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:15:56PM -0400, Dave Anderson said that
> > > For dynamic content it's even simpler -- the program producing the
> > > content should also p
On Jun 29, 2012 6:56 AM, "frantisek holop" wrote:
>
> hmm, on Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:15:56PM -0400, Dave Anderson said that
> > For dynamic content it's even simpler -- the program producing the
> > content should also provide the corresponding header information.
>
> and it does so inside the o
frantisek holop writes:
> > For dynamic content it's even simpler -- the program producing the
> > content should also provide the corresponding header information.
>
> and it does so inside the of the page.
> a perfectly normal and accepted practice.
> btw. a content-type meta tag is _mandatory_
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:46:12PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> >> IIRC, Theo did the current design himself after everyone else failed to
> > come up with something good.
> >
> > Well, Theo had some rather fun constraints, like making a web site that
> > works
> > with antiquated brow
> Other than "boring", no one has actually STATED a problem of the OpenBSD
> website.
It's not PINK enough. I want PINK everywhere. PINK PINK PINK. PINK text
on a PINK background.
Oh and BROWN. BROWN BROWN BROWN.
Thinking about it, PINK text on a PINK background won't work will it.
Grey, grey
hmm, on Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 04:15:56PM -0400, Dave Anderson said that
> >because AddDefaultCharset is a braindead concept.
>
> No, just one that needs to be applied only when appropriate. The truly
> braindead idea is that of partially parsing a file in order to find out
> what charset you shoul
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, frantisek holop wrote:
>
>>hmm, on Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:47:00AM -0400, Dave Anderson said that
>>> Using META is _ugly_, especially for specifying a charset (since the
>>> page will be read up through the META element
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:53:04AM -0700, Tim Howe wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:26:52 +0200
> Marc Espie wrote:
>
> > If you guys are serious about anything, go look at ports-readmes.
> >
> > It does extract information from the ports tree, and creates readmes for
> > all ports.
> >
> > Curr
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, frantisek holop wrote:
>hmm, on Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:47:00AM -0400, Dave Anderson said that
>> Using META is _ugly_, especially for specifying a charset (since the
>> page will be read up through the META element using the charset
>> specified in the real header or assumed
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:09:37 -0700
patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Tim Howe wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:26:52 +0200
> > Marc Espie wrote:
> >
> >> If you guys are serious about anything, go look at ports-readmes.
> >>
> >> It does extract information from the
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Tim Howe wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:26:52 +0200
> Marc Espie wrote:
>
>> If you guys are serious about anything, go look at ports-readmes.
>>
>> It does extract information from the ports tree, and creates readmes for
>> all ports.
>>
>> Currently, it's a st
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:26:52 +0200
Marc Espie wrote:
> If you guys are serious about anything, go look at ports-readmes.
>
> It does extract information from the ports tree, and creates readmes for
> all ports.
>
> Currently, it's a static port. It could very well be a dynamic application.
>
>
>If you guys are serious about anything, go look at ports-readmes.
>
>It does extract information from the ports tree, and creates readmes for
>all ports.
>
>Currently, it's a static port. It could very well be a dynamic application.
>
>You can experiment with css, you can experiment with nginx.
>
hmm, on Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:47:00AM -0400, Dave Anderson said that
> Using META is _ugly_, especially for specifying a charset (since the
> page will be read up through the META element using the charset
> specified in the real header or assumed by the browser -- and that
> charset could be inc
All the stuff under papers comes from wherever. It's not really part of the
website proper. Consolidating all that content into a consistent style, any
style, would be great.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:00, Andres Perera wrote:
> imo the issue has more to do with one page using a completely
> dif
imo the issue has more to do with one page using a completely
different scheme than all the others. that happens when you copy-paste
massive tags at the beginning of every doc instead of using your
preferred flavor of "#include". you could of course go another route
and try to justify it by saying
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2012-06-28, ropers wrote:
>> On 28 June 2012 01:17, Andres Perera wrote:
A http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan11-mandoc-openbsd.html
>>>
>>>
>>> that page is encoded iso 8859-1, doesn't state so anywhere, breaks
>>> with browsers configured
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:31, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:46:12PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>> IIRC, Theo did the current design himself after everyone else failed to
> come up with something good.
>
> Well, Theo had some rather fun constraints, like making a web site that
On 2012-06-28, ropers wrote:
> On 28 June 2012 01:17, Andres Perera wrote:
>>> http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan11-mandoc-openbsd.html
>>
>>
>> that page is encoded iso 8859-1, doesn't state so anywhere, breaks
>> with browsers configured to default to utf8 in the absence of encoding
>> quali
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 02:55:53AM -0700, Timmy L Steve wrote:
> On 06/28/2012 01:26 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> >If you guys are serious about anything, go look at ports-readmes.
> >
> >It does extract information from the ports tree, and creates readmes for
> >all ports.
> >
> >Currently, it's a stat
On 06/28/2012 01:26 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
If you guys are serious about anything, go look at ports-readmes.
It does extract information from the ports tree, and creates readmes for
all ports.
Currently, it's a static port. It could very well be a dynamic application.
You can experiment with cs
Talk ajax to me, baby.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:46:12PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>> IIRC, Theo did the current design himself after everyone else failed to come
>> up with something good.
>
> Well, Theo had some rather fun constraints,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:46:12PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> IIRC, Theo did the current design himself after everyone else failed to come
> up with something good.
Well, Theo had some rather fun constraints, like making a web site that works
with antiquated browsers, like "no css".
If tha
If you guys are serious about anything, go look at ports-readmes.
It does extract information from the ports tree, and creates readmes for
all ports.
Currently, it's a static port. It could very well be a dynamic application.
You can experiment with css, you can experiment with nginx.
Preferabl
that patch is not a solution
a good solution is use m4 or another macro language (maybe cpp since
apparently line-based macro languages are liked by mandoc freaks) to
add an "include" to all pages in the www/* repository
also, a commit hook that ensures that newly added or modified pages
meet a s
On 28 June 2012 01:17, Andres Perera wrote:
>> http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bsdcan11-mandoc-openbsd.html
>
>
> that page is encoded iso 8859-1, doesn't state so anywhere, breaks
> with browsers configured to default to utf8 in the absence of encoding
> qualifiers
$ telnet www.openbsd.org 80
Try
On Jun 27, 2012 8:41 PM, "Andres Perera" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Philip Guenther
wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Andres Perera
wrote:
> > ...
> >> that page is encoded iso 8859-1, doesn't state so anywhere, breaks
> >> with browsers configured to default to utf8 i
On 27/06/2012 22:53, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
Here's something I think would be a *major* improvement. Fix
magicpoint to export slides in a format better than jpg.
Or extend mandoc to support Comic Sans so it can be used for
presentation slid
>Peter Laufenberg [open...@laufenberg.ch] wrote:
>>
>> I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a professional graphic
>> designer to redo parts of OpenBSD's visual design. His portfolio:
>>
>> www.flexstudio.ch
>>
>> Richard is a very good friend but still your typical starving
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> ...
>> that page is encoded iso 8859-1, doesn't state so anywhere, breaks
>> with browsers configured to default to utf8 in the absence of encoding
>> qualifiers
>
> Those browsers ar
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
...
> that page is encoded iso 8859-1, doesn't state so anywhere, breaks
> with browsers configured to default to utf8 in the absence of encoding
> qualifiers
Those browsers are violating the HTTP/1.1 standard. RFC 2616, section
3.7.1, paragr
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Matthew Dempsky wrote on Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:53:09PM -0700:
>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
>>> Here's something I think would be a *major* improvement.
>>> Fix magicpoint to export slides in a format bet
I agree 100%; the 1st question an artist would ask is "what are you trying to
accomplish?"
If you don't want more OpenBSD users/contributors and really the message is
"piss off, nothing to see here, we're fine as is, leave us alone", then the
current web site as well as references to floppies a
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
>
> Other than "boring", no one has actually STATED a problem of the OpenBSD
> website. What message are we not getting across? If there is a PROBLEM
> you see that makes getting its information to you difficult, please
> state it and indicate
Hi,
Matthew Dempsky wrote on Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:53:09PM -0700:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> Here's something I think would be a *major* improvement.
>> Fix magicpoint to export slides in a format better than jpg.
That's not the only thing that could be fixed abo
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:55 PM, john slee wrote:
> Do you think that if the reader finds reading to be optimal at a
> particular column width, that said reader may well adjust their
> browser window to suit?
sorry but that's complete bs. you are essentially expecting users to
re-size the window
>TLDR: It's not your place to tell others what they like.
Am I?
It's not about one individual likes, it's about whether your messages reaches a
majority of your audience. Most of the filtering is subconscious and immune to
fashion btw.
>On 28 June 2012 07:59, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>> It too
Peter Laufenberg [open...@laufenberg.ch] wrote:
>
> I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a professional graphic
> designer to redo parts of OpenBSD's visual design. His portfolio:
>
> www.flexstudio.ch
>
> Richard is a very good friend but still your typical starving artist w
On 06/27/12 17:58, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
>>> Speaking personally, I wouldn't mind if OpenBSD's website were
>>> updated. Just no one has volunteered yet to do the dirty work of
>>> actually coming up with a functional design and then updating the
>>> HTML.
>>>
>>> Talk is cheap.
>
> I'm willi
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Peter Laufenberg
wrote:
>>On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Peter Laufenberg
>>wrote:
>>> I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a professional
> graphic
>>designer to redo parts of OpenBSD's visual design. His portfolio:
>>
>>that would be cool to p
TLDR: It's not your place to tell others what they like.
On 28 June 2012 07:59, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> It took me _years_ to understand and respect that graphic design
> isn't all that subjective, that it's a craft, with harmonic rules similar
> to music
Maybe it does, but your comment sounds
>On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Peter Laufenberg
>wrote:
>> I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a professional
graphic
>designer to redo parts of OpenBSD's visual design. His portfolio:
>
>that would be cool to presence as a bystander
No te entiendo tío!
>pay the dude regardl
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Peter Laufenberg
wrote:
>>> Speaking personally, I wouldn't mind if OpenBSD's website were
>>> updated. Just no one has volunteered yet to do the dirty work of
>>> actually coming up with a functional design and then updating the
>>> HTML.
>>>
>>> Talk is cheap.
>
>> Speaking personally, I wouldn't mind if OpenBSD's website were
>> updated. Just no one has volunteered yet to do the dirty work of
>> actually coming up with a functional design and then updating the
>> HTML.
>>
>> Talk is cheap.
I'm willing to indirectly donate to OpenBSD by paying a profess
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 13:53, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> Here's something I think would be a *major* improvement. Fix
>> magicpoint to export slides in a format better than jpg.
>
> Or extend mandoc to support Comic Sans so it can be used for
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Here's something I think would be a *major* improvement. Fix
> magicpoint to export slides in a format better than jpg.
Or extend mandoc to support Comic Sans so it can be used for
presentation slide decks!
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 15:11, Nick Holland wrote:
> Others in this thread have described what would need to be maintained in
> any "improvement". Let me add (as I don't think it was mentioned),
> static pages, managed by CVS, able to be mirrored by anyone, publicly or
> privately. Multiple rend
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:19, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
> > Really? Can we do that? Seems, by this thread and previous about this
> > subject,
> > that nobody is waiting for any diffs regarding this
>
> There's so much low hanging fruit that could be improved before
> somebody starts d
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:48:46PM +0200, Bret Lambert wrote:
> > PHP is like s early 2000s. ?When's Python gonna go into base?
>
> You're behind the times; python's been replaced by ruby running on top
> of mongodb
I see each day more developers migrating their personal websites from
php/pyt
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:19, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
> Really? Can we do that? Seems, by this thread and previous about this
> subject,
> that nobody is waiting for any diffs regarding this
There's so much low hanging fruit that could be improved before
somebody starts dicking about w
On 06/27/2012 10:19 AM, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Really? Can we do that? Seems, by this thread and previous about this subject,
that nobody is waiting for any diffs regarding this
- Alvaro
Of course, you can do anything you wish.
No one is EXPECTING quality diffs, for our definitio
No hadoop and shards? Blasphemy!
Sent from my iPhone 7 beta
On Jun 27, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez
wrote:
> That is a joke...right? Nothing is better than Django
>
> El 27/06/2012, a las 11:48, Bret Lambert escribi¨®:
>
>>> PHP is like s early 2000s. When's Python gonna
> Speaking personally, I wouldn't mind if OpenBSD's website were
> updated. Just no one has volunteered yet to do the dirty work of
> actually coming up with a functional design and then updating the
> HTML.
>
> Talk is cheap.
Yes, talk is unbelievably cheap.
On the other hand, if whatever anyo
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez
wrote:
> Really? Can we do that?
Yes. There's no filters in place on the mailing list to prevent
people from submitting diffs, but there's also no guarantee that just
because you send in a diff that it'll be committed either.
If someone's
That is a joke...right? Nothing is better than Django
El 27/06/2012, a las 11:48, Bret Lambert escribió:
>> PHP is like s early 2000s. When's Python gonna go into base?
>
> You're behind the times; python's been replaced by ruby running on top
> of mongodb
[demime 1.01d removed an attac
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Bret Lambert
wrote:
>> PHP is like s early 2000s. When's Python gonna go into base?
>
> You're behind the times; python's been replaced by ruby running on top
> of mongodb
ah crap! Off to buy a bunch of O'Reilly books about that.
I guess that means migratin
> PHP is like s early 2000s. When's Python gonna go into base?
You're behind the times; python's been replaced by ruby running on top
of mongodb
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Theo de Raadt
wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
>> > > I'd prefer the (small) team of developers to work on the code.
>> >
>> > Well, that's a false dichotomy: not all OpenBSD committers work on the
>> > code. A handful work primarily on maintain
Really? Can we do that? Seems, by this thread and previous about this subject,
that nobody is waiting for any diffs regarding this
- Alvaro
El 27/06/2012, a las 02:12, Eric Furman escribió:
> We are all anxiously awaiting your diffs...
>
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012, at 07:52 PM, Alvaro Mantilla
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 05:30:18PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote:
>
> banner `wget http://www.openbsd.org/ -O -`
>
That's nice, but it would be nice if someone could take some
responsibility and make banner css-aware. Imagine being able to specify
a cool font face with anti-aliased edges and true tr
Chris Cappuccio writes:
> Duh, this is OpenBSD. We use
>
> banner `ftp -o - http://www.openbsd.org/`
You mean: banner `lynx -dump http://www.openbsd.org/`
--
Manuel Giraud
Op Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:54:11 +0200 schreef Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
:
On 2012-06-26 18:46, Pablo Velasco Fernández wrote:
Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual"
web page. ( Its only my opinion ) Wh
On 2012-06-26 18:46, Pablo Velasco Fernández wrote:
> Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
> page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
>
The FreeBSD website seems optimized for re
ohh, just had a sleep and missed great propagated, essential improvements.
No one cares 'bout design.
No one wants to sell something with eyecandy.
No one wants to do the work
For what? Worldpeace? Annoying, bored L1nux users with limited reading
& selfreflection capabilities?
In fact of telling
We are all anxiously awaiting your diffs...
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012, at 07:52 PM, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
> Why is not possible to apply a new css style to the current site? That
> has
> nothing to do with joomla (and similar) and would keep the site fast and
> compatible with, let's sayly
Ok. I understand. I forgot that the webpage desing allows you to use a
lightweight browsers. Thanks :)
El 27/06/2012 06:17, "Tomas Bodzar" escribió:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Pablo Velasco Fernández
> wrote:
> > Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Pablo Velasco Fernández
wrote:
> Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
> page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
>
Hate overusing of word 'cool'
If the site is OK as it is, why add more fluff? Style sheets certainly
aren't
blotund like Jooma is, but why go there for the site? Guess I'm a
minimalist.
--STeve Andre'
On 06/26/12 21:52, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Why is not possible to apply a new css style to the current site? That
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
> > > I'd prefer the (small) team of developers to work on the code.
> >
> > Well, that's a false dichotomy: not all OpenBSD committers work on the
> > code. A handful work primarily on maintaining the website and/or
> > documentation, because that's an
Why is not possible to apply a new css style to the current site? That has
nothing to do with joomla (and similar) and would keep the site fast and
compatible with, let's saylynx or whatever browser do you want to try with
the site.
I mean, for me the site is ok but a new css style could be a
Chris Bennett wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 06:59:28PM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert
>wrote:
>> If you really wanna improve that, I'd suggest reworking the same
>> webpage, but making it possible for people with vision impairment to
>> use it more effectively, I've been told that there are a s
Duh, this is OpenBSD. We use
banner `ftp -o - http://www.openbsd.org/`
Chris Bennett [ch...@bennettconstruction.us] wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 06:59:28PM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> > If you really wanna improve that, I'd suggest reworking the same
> > webpage, but making it pos
On 06/26/12 17:57, Pablo Velasco Fernández wrote:
I mean.. A modern style.
El 26/06/2012 23:55, "Miod Vallat" escribió:
Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
page. ( Its only my opinion
Quoting Matthew Dempsky :
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
> > I'd prefer the (small) team of developers to work on the code.
>
> Well, that's a false dichotomy: not all OpenBSD committers work on the
> code. A handful work primarily on maintaining the website and/or
> documentation, be
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
> I'd prefer the (small) team of developers to work on the code.
Well, that's a false dichotomy: not all OpenBSD committers work on the
code. A handful work primarily on maintaining the website and/or
documentation, because that's an important job too.
We could add a few facebook 'i like' buttons here and there and have a
m.openbsd.org for iphones and androis (no openbsd smartphone yet). After
that we could kill lynx from the tree because it will be useless.
-luis
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 06:59:28PM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> If you really wanna improve that, I'd suggest reworking the same
> webpage, but making it possible for people with vision impairment to
> use it more effectively, I've been told that there are a some ways to
> improve it.
>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Pablo Velasco Fernández
wrote:
> I mean.. A modern style.
Honestly, because it's just not a high priority. The OpenBSD website
is very information dense and its maintained by people who care a lot
about the information being accurate and useful and not as much ab
>
> From: Pablo Velasco Fernández
> Sent: Tue Jun 26 23:46:36 CEST 2012
> To:
> Subject: OpenBSD's webpage desing
>
>
> Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> desing. Maybe OpenBSD should
Quoting Pablo Velasco Fernández :
> I mean.. A modern style.
> El 26/06/2012 23:55, "Miod Vallat" escribió:
>
> > > Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a
> cool
> > > desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most
> "visual" web
> > > page. ( Its only m
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Pablo Velasco Fernández
wrote:
> Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
> page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
>
I'm on freebsd page with lynx
Miod Vallat wrote on Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:55:41PM MST:
> Last time I checked, you could use eyes to browse the OpenBSD website.
> Why do you consider it non-visual?
It's non-visual because you can easily parse its HTML, without the cumbersome
use of eyes. The best option, of course, it to infuse
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Pablo Velasco Fernández
wrote:
> Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
> page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
The FAQ could definitely use som
I mean.. A modern style.
El 26/06/2012 23:55, "Miod Vallat" escribió:
> > Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> > desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
> > page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
>
> Last time I chec
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:46:36PM +0200, Pablo Velasco Fern?ndez wrote:
> Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
> page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
>
>From FAQ:
8.23 - W
On 26 June 2012 18:46, Pablo Velasco Fernández wrote:
> Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
> page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
>
Yeah, FreeBSD webpage is cool, until you
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Pablo Velasco Fernández
wrote:
> Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
> page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
I like coconut flavored ice-crea
> Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
> page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
Last time I checked, you could use eyes to browse the OpenBSD website.
Why do you consider it non
Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
99 matches
Mail list logo
