Re: Patch 009 fails on BASE-5.6 amd64
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 08:33:07PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > Andrew Lester wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I’ve just performed a fresh install of OpenBSD 5.6-BASE (not an upgrade) > > using the purchased disc set, and have been applying the patches in order, > > and all have been successful. However, the httpd patch (#009) has failed, > > and I ended up with several “rej” files. This system could not be more > > vanilla, no additional software was installed. The X packages and games > > were not installed. I have taken the output of the signify command which > > provides information about the specific failures, as well as the four rej > > files that were generated and put them into a tar archive if anybody would > > like to see the specifics of the failure. Here is a shared link from > > Dropbox: > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/yk9olnqdeeru7m6/009_httpd_failures.tar?dl=0 > > > > Has anybody else encountered this issue? I am holding off on applying the > > additional patches in the mean time. Please let me know if there is any > > additional information I can provide. > > The CDs shipped with a slightly different source tree, that missed a few > changes to the httpd directory. You can use cvs to update the httpd, either to > OPENBSD_5_6_BASE and apply the patch, or to OPENSD_5_6 which is simpler. Or use a downloaded source tree and apply the patch.. > > I should add a note to the web page; we didn't discover this until some time > after the patch. Thanks for reminding me. -- / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
Re: Patch 009 fails on BASE-5.6 amd64
Andrew Lester wrote: > Hi All, > > I’ve just performed a fresh install of OpenBSD 5.6-BASE (not an upgrade) > using the purchased disc set, and have been applying the patches in order, > and all have been successful. However, the httpd patch (#009) has failed, and > I ended up with several “rej” files. This system could not be more vanilla, > no additional software was installed. The X packages and games were not > installed. I have taken the output of the signify command which provides > information about the specific failures, as well as the four rej files that > were generated and put them into a tar archive if anybody would like to see > the specifics of the failure. Here is a shared link from Dropbox: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/yk9olnqdeeru7m6/009_httpd_failures.tar?dl=0 > > Has anybody else encountered this issue? I am holding off on applying the > additional patches in the mean time. Please let me know if there is any > additional information I can provide. The CDs shipped with a slightly different source tree, that missed a few changes to the httpd directory. You can use cvs to update the httpd, either to OPENBSD_5_6_BASE and apply the patch, or to OPENSD_5_6 which is simpler. I should add a note to the web page; we didn't discover this until some time after the patch. Thanks for reminding me.
Patch 009 fails on BASE-5.6 amd64
Hi All, I’ve just performed a fresh install of OpenBSD 5.6-BASE (not an upgrade) using the purchased disc set, and have been applying the patches in order, and all have been successful. However, the httpd patch (#009) has failed, and I ended up with several “rej” files. This system could not be more vanilla, no additional software was installed. The X packages and games were not installed. I have taken the output of the signify command which provides information about the specific failures, as well as the four rej files that were generated and put them into a tar archive if anybody would like to see the specifics of the failure. Here is a shared link from Dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/s/yk9olnqdeeru7m6/009_httpd_failures.tar?dl=0 Has anybody else encountered this issue? I am holding off on applying the additional patches in the mean time. Please let me know if there is any additional information I can provide. Kind regards, Andrew Lester
