a == Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl writes:
a On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 01:57:55PM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
I've recently noticed reduced performance when building ports for
amd64 and i386 platforms on multiprocessor boxes. I found the problem
was associated with running a 'nice'd dnetc
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 07:07:13AM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
a == Ariane van der Steldt ari...@stack.nl writes:
a On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 01:57:55PM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
[...]
The problem can be reproduced by busying each core w/ a 'nice'd
I've recently noticed reduced performance when building ports for
amd64 and i386 platforms on multiprocessor boxes. I found the problem
was associated with running a 'nice'd dnetc [1] process on each
processor. Without the 'nice'd processes, performance improves
dramatically.
In a test case,
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 01:57:55PM -0400, RD Thrush wrote:
I've recently noticed reduced performance when building ports for
amd64 and i386 platforms on multiprocessor boxes. I found the problem
was associated with running a 'nice'd dnetc [1] process on each
processor. Without the 'nice'd
4 matches
Mail list logo
