On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Ryan McBride wrote:
SNIP
In my opinion if you're talking about NATing 750 Windows boxes doing
regular Windows-type things, you're going to want to at least at crank
the limits on states and turn on adaptive timeouts; I wouldn't go any
further than that unless you run into
Hi,
I'm setting up a gateway (1.7 Ghz machine with 1 Gig of ram) for 700+
users using pf with NAT and BINAT's (90% NAT).I would like to know
if anyone has any recommendations on tweaking the runtime options in
PF. This box will pretty much just be handling the natting with a bare
On 2/23/06, Steve D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm setting up a gateway (1.7 Ghz machine with 1 Gig of ram) for 700+
users using pf with NAT and BINAT's (90% NAT).I would like to know
if anyone has any recommendations on tweaking the runtime options in
PF. This box will pretty much just be
Steve D. wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up a gateway (1.7 Ghz machine with 1 Gig of ram) for 700+
users using pf with NAT and BINAT's (90% NAT).I would like to know
if anyone has any recommendations on tweaking the runtime options in
PF. This box will pretty much just be handling the natting
Nick Holland wrote:
Steve D. wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up a gateway (1.7 Ghz machine with 1 Gig of ram) for 700+
users using pf with NAT and BINAT's (90% NAT).I would like to
know if anyone has any recommendations on tweaking the runtime
options in PF. This box will pretty much just be
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 08:39:36PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
Steve D. wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up a gateway (1.7 Ghz machine with 1 Gig of ram) for 700+
users using pf with NAT and BINAT's (90% NAT).I would like to know
if anyone has any recommendations on tweaking the runtime options
6 matches
Mail list logo
