Re: New alternative identd port question

2007-10-12 Thread Edd Barrett
On 11/10/2007, Strykar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >sscanf(buff,"%d,%d",&u1,&u2); hmmm. yes -- Best Regards Edd --- http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett

Re: Port Question

2006-01-29 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 08:19:34PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > PF works GREAT! > > Here is a list of ports that have had data sent to them today. > The 2nd number is the number of packets dropped. > Is there anything in the list that I should pay particular attention to? No, what a firewall bloc

Re: Port Question

2006-01-29 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Dave Feustel wrote: PF works GREAT! Here is a list of ports that have had data sent to them today. The 2nd number is the number of packets dropped. Is there anything in the list that I should pay particular attention to? Thanks, Dave Feustel 23 104 telnet 23/udp Telnet 31 3 msg-auth 31/udp MSG

Re: Port Question

2006-01-29 Thread David Higgs
Why not use netstat(1) and figure out for yourself if you'd otherwise be accepting traffic on any of those ports? Also, if this is non-essential traffic being dropped (and you aren't being DoS'd) there's no reason to care about it. --david On 1/29/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PF

Port Question

2006-01-29 Thread Dave Feustel
PF works GREAT! Here is a list of ports that have had data sent to them today. The 2nd number is the number of packets dropped. Is there anything in the list that I should pay particular attention to? Thanks, Dave Feustel 23 104 telnet 23/udp Telnet 31 3 msg-auth 31/udp MSG Authentication 34 4 #